IWF backs down on Wiki censorship
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7774102.stm
--
Think Feynman/
http://pobox.com/~gordo/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]///
___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_UK
At 22:17 + 9/12/08, Gordon Joly wrote:
IWF backs down on Wiki censorship
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7774102.stm
http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/IWF_reverses_censorship_of_Wikipedia?curid=117966
--
Think Feynman/
http://pobox.com/~gordo/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]///
I think a better analogy would be paintings in galleries which depict under
18s, many of which could be considered Images depicting erotic posing with
no sexual activity. I am thinking of some of the paintings of Caravaggio,
almost any depiction of Ganymede etc.
An under 18 naked in an erotic
You are, of course, right.
That doesn't change, however, that this image is not illegal to view, it's
merely in a greyer legal area of might be illegal. Which does nothing to
change the IWF's shameful overreach in blocking the article as well as the
image — and in doing such a cack-handed job
PROTECTED] To:
wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] UK censorship:
I'm on BBC Radio 4 Today show tomorrow 8:20am You are, of course, right.
That doesn't change, however, that this image is not illegal to view, it's
merely in a greyer legal area of might be illegal
