> I think a better analogy would be paintings in galleries which depict under > 18s, many of which could be considered "Images depicting erotic posing with > no sexual activity". I am thinking of some of the paintings of Caravaggio, > almost any depiction of Ganymede etc.
An under 18 naked in an erotic pose, even without sexual activity, would qualify as "indecent" by my understanding of how that word is usually interpreted. The key thing with the Virgin Killer cover is that the pose isn't erotic. It's clearly designed to show off her nudity, but that's all. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_UK http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
