> You are, of course, right. > That doesn't change, however, that this image is not illegal to view, it's > merely in a greyer legal area of "might be illegal". Which does nothing to > change the IWF's shameful overreach in blocking the article as well as the > image — and in doing such a cack-handed job of either. :o)
If hasn't been proven in a court of law not to be illegal to view. However, it is not illegal to view simply because the image is not sexual as is plain to any reasonable person. So, as you say, the IWF has gone overboard in blocking it. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_UK http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
