2009/2/20 David Gerard :
> 2009/2/20 Thomas Dalton :
>
>> Many of the problems are with that list. The list contains html pages,
>> not images (at least, not exclusively), and not even the right html
>> pages (they never blocked the [[Image:...]] page). If the government
>> ran it, they would be ac
2009/2/20 Thomas Dalton :
> Many of the problems are with that list. The list contains html pages,
> not images (at least, not exclusively), and not even the right html
> pages (they never blocked the [[Image:...]] page). If the government
> ran it, they would be accountable, IWF aren't.
The Tod
2009/2/20 geni :
> 2009/2/20 Brian McNeil :
>> I have not, and would not, actively seek out child pornography. However, I
>> have a clue about how the modern Internet works. Any semi-intelligent
>> publisher of child pornography is going to use things like hidden services
>> on Tor. The IWF has ze
2009/2/20 geni :
> Blaming the wrong people there.
>
> The IWF effectively has two missions.
>
> 1)Contact UK based ISPs and get them to take down illegal content.
> This was their initial mission and by most accounts they are fairly
> good at it.
>
> 2)Provide a list of material that can be fed in
2009/2/20 Brian McNeil :
> David is right, if they haven't a clue about techniques to manage a modern
> website - techniques that are over ten years old - then they are quite
> simply not fit to manage any sort of filtering blacklist.
>
> I have not, and would not, actively seek out child pornograp
ssage-
From: wikimediauk-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org
[mailto:wikimediauk-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of geni
Sent: 20 February 2009 19:47
To: wikimediauk-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimediauk-l] ZDNet: IWF on Wikipedia block
2009/2/20 Thomas Dalton :
> 2009/2/20 geni :
2009/2/20 geni :
> 2009/2/20 Thomas Dalton :
>> 2009/2/20 geni :
>>> They probably do it's just there are rather a lot of ways out there of
>>> organising your website and they didn't immediately pick up on which
>>> one wikipedia uses.
>>
>> You mean they didn't right click on the image and click
2009/2/20 Thomas Dalton :
> 2009/2/20 geni :
>> They probably do it's just there are rather a lot of ways out there of
>> organising your website and they didn't immediately pick up on which
>> one wikipedia uses.
>
> You mean they didn't right click on the image and click "properties"?
> That seem
2009/2/20 geni :
> They probably do it's just there are rather a lot of ways out there of
> organising your website and they didn't immediately pick up on which
> one wikipedia uses.
You mean they didn't right click on the image and click "properties"?
That seems pretty incompetent to me...
_
2009/2/20 David Gerard :
> 2009/2/20 David Gerard :
>> 2009/2/20 Al Tally :
>
>>> Oh dear. Well, mind posting what you wrote here? I read it, but closed the
>>> tab...
>
>> I didn't save it myself! I've left another comment asking WTF happened
>> to the first one and asking if they want to phone me
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 5:43 PM, David Gerard wrote:
> 2009/2/20 David Gerard :
> > 2009/2/20 Al Tally :
>
> >> Oh dear. Well, mind posting what you wrote here? I read it, but closed
> the
> >> tab...
>
> > I didn't save it myself! I've left another comment asking WTF happened
> > to the first on
2009/2/20 David Gerard :
> 2009/2/20 Al Tally :
>> Oh dear. Well, mind posting what you wrote here? I read it, but closed the
>> tab...
> I didn't save it myself! I've left another comment asking WTF happened
> to the first one and asking if they want to phone me for verification.
All straighte
2009/2/20 Al Tally :
> Oh dear. Well, mind posting what you wrote here? I read it, but closed the
> tab...
I didn't save it myself! I've left another comment asking WTF happened
to the first one and asking if they want to phone me for verification.
- d.
___
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 5:20 PM, David Gerard wrote:
> 2009/2/20 Al Tally :
> > 2009/2/20 Mark (Markie)
>
> >> comment seems to have been deleted? doesnt show at the bottom and this
> >> _was_ the link:
> >>
> http://www.zdnet.co.uk/talkback/0,101161,39616171-39001105c-20100584o,00.htm
>
> >
2009/2/20 Al Tally :
> 2009/2/20 Mark (Markie)
>> comment seems to have been deleted? doesnt show at the bottom and this
>> _was_ the link:
>> http://www.zdnet.co.uk/talkback/0,101161,39616171-39001105c-20100584o,00.htm
> Strange. David did you delete it?
No, I certainly didn't. Looks like
2009/2/20 Mark (Markie)
> comment seems to have been deleted? doesnt show at the bottom and this
> _was_ the link:
> http://www.zdnet.co.uk/talkback/0,101161,39616171-39001105c-20100584o,00.htm
>
> regards
>
> mark
>
Strange. David did you delete it?
--
Alex
(User:Majorly)
comment seems to have been deleted? doesnt show at the bottom and this _was_
the link:
http://www.zdnet.co.uk/talkback/0,101161,39616171-39001105c-20100584o,00.htm
regards
mark
2009/2/20 Al Tally
> 2009/2/20 David Gerard
>
>> http://news.zdnet.co.uk/internet/0,100097,39616171,00.htm
>
2009/2/20 David Gerard
> http://news.zdnet.co.uk/internet/0,100097,39616171,00.htm
>
> I added a very pointed comment indeed.
>
>
> - d.
>
Nice.
--
Alex
(User:Majorly)
___
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediau...@wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedi
18 matches
Mail list logo
