On 18/05/11 00:44, K. Peachey wrote:
Because we don't like it, If a bug is open and awaiting information it
should be OPEN, not RESOLVED LATER dashed away where no one will ever
look at it again, most people don't like having later enabled either
That is why there is an UNCONFIRMED state.
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 8:44 AM, K. Peachey p858sn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Happy-melon happy-me...@live.com wrote:
The default BZ configuration comes, AFAIK, with a REMIND resolution. This
was briefly reenabled during the BZ4 upgrade, but was subsequently disabled
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 9:45 AM, John Vandenberg jay...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Brion Vibber br...@wikimedia.org wrote:
MZ, if you're aware of *any* specific bugs where this is an issue, please
let me or Mark know and we'll take a look at them.
MZMcBride:
As long as people stop resolving old bugs as wontfix simply because
they're old. I went through and re-opened quite a few bugs that were
improperly marked as resolved over the weekend.
There were *many* bugs closed that weekend. Which included duplicating
to similar bugs and also
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 3:56 AM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Mark A. Hershberger wrote:
There is hope for every bug, no matter how old.
As long as people stop resolving old bugs as wontfix simply because
they're old. I went through and re-opened quite a few bugs that were
Brion Vibber wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 3:56 AM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Mark A. Hershberger wrote:
There is hope for every bug, no matter how old.
As long as people stop resolving old bugs as wontfix simply because
they're old. I went through and re-opened quite a few bugs
Brion Vibber br...@wikimedia.org wrote in message
news:BANLkTi=fayp8ekgw4aoag+j+-lkpz+n...@mail.gmail.com...
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 3:56 AM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
A 'NEEDINFO' resolution would probably be better than 'WONTFIX' for this
case, and we should see if we can enable
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Happy-melon happy-me...@live.com wrote:
The default BZ configuration comes, AFAIK, with a REMIND resolution. This
was briefly reenabled during the BZ4 upgrade, but was subsequently disabled
again and the bugs I had closed with it reclassed as LATER. This
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Brion Vibber br...@wikimedia.org wrote:
MZ, if you're aware of *any* specific bugs where this is an issue, please
let me or Mark know and we'll take a look at them.
http://wikisource.org/wiki/WS:BUGS
--
John Vandenberg
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Happy-melon happy-me...@live.com wrote:
The default BZ configuration comes, AFAIK, with a REMIND resolution. This
was briefly reenabled during the BZ4 upgrade, but was subsequently disabled
again and the bugs I had closed with it reclassed as LATER. This
Luiz Augusto lugu...@gmail.com writes:
Firstly, thank you very much for enabling DPL on all Wikisources! [1] It is
IMO a pity that this request was fulfilled based only in a direct request,
but at least it is now enabled.
Please help us to develop Wikimedia contents in foreign languages
Mark A. Hershberger wrote:
There is hope for every bug, no matter how old.
As long as people stop resolving old bugs as wontfix simply because
they're old. I went through and re-opened quite a few bugs that were
improperly marked as resolved over the weekend.
People take time to register an
Hi all,
Firstly, thank you very much for enabling DPL on all Wikisources! [1] It is
IMO a pity that this request was fulfilled based only in a direct request,
but at least it is now enabled.
I'm no longer involved on Wikimedia projects like in the past years, but I'm
still looking their
I totally aggree that site requests take waaay to long to be closed. I
therefore support Luiz Augusto's request.
Strainu
2011/5/15 Luiz Augusto lugu...@gmail.com:
Hi all,
Firstly, thank you very much for enabling DPL on all Wikisources! [1] It is
IMO a pity that this request was fulfilled
14 matches
Mail list logo
