On 8 June, 2011, Google, Facebook, Yahoo!, Akamai and Limelight
Networks will be amongst some of the major organisations that will offer
their content over IPv6 for a 24-hour test drive. The goal of the Test
Drive Day is to motivate organizations across the industry – Internet
service
On the mediawiki side of things:
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/IPv6_support
On the wikimedia side of things:
http://wikitech.wikimedia.org/view/IPv6_deployment
I have no idea on the current stati or is that statues of those pages.
-Peachey
___
The simplest way to add an icon to the main bar of the WikiEditor is
the following:
kCustomMainInsertButton(
'welcome', //imageId
'http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a4/Gnome-face-smile.svg/22px-Gnome-face-smile.svg.png'
, //imageFile
'Welcome',
2011/1/16 Jon Davis w...@konsoletek.com:
I've run MediaWiki on an IPv6 only (and Dual Stack) enviroment and it works
just fine (from my limited testing). So the issues are probably more on the
infrastructure side and trying not to horribly maim the site for a day.
With anonymous editors? And
Mark Bergsma has been testing / gathering statistics on IPv6 at
nl.wikipedia.org:
* http://nl.wikipedia.org/?title=MediaWiki:Common.jsdiff=20163563
* http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki:Common.js/IPv6.js
* http://ipv4.labs.wikimedia.org/
* http://ipv6and4.labs.wikimedia.org/
--
Krinkle
Op
Hello,
We have a couple of bugs requiring shell access. They are mostly about
tweaking namespaces, enabling an extension, configuring mediawiki.
It seems those bugs are mostly handled by RobH, Jeluf and myself. I am
wondering if we could create a working group under bugzilla and assign
the
Adding the stuff to the toolbar works fine. The problem is inserting
things into the article's wikitext. As far as I can tell, I'm doing it
exactly the same way as the other dialogs in the toolbar, and it works
the same in every browser except IE.
--
Alex (wikipedia:en:User:Mr.Z-man)
On
Hello,
I have wgCodeReviewDeferredPaths on mediawiki.org which let us
automatically defers revisions based on a path.
The initial list is currently:
+$wgCodeReviewDeferredPaths['mediawiki'] = array(
+'%^/trunk/extensions/SemanticForms%',
+'%^/trunk/WikiWord%',
+);
The bug
Hey,
Shouldn't that be $eg instead of $wg?
Cheers
--
Jeroen De Dauw
http://www.bn2vs.com
Don't panic. Don't be evil.
--
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
On 16/01/11 20:03, Jeroen De Dauw wrote:
Shouldn't that be $eg instead of $wg?
CodeReview uses global $wgCodeReviewDeferredPaths;
--
Ashar Voultoiz
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Hey,
My point is that code review is an extension, so AFAIK should use $eg, not
$wg.
Cheers
--
Jeroen De Dauw
http://www.bn2vs.com
Don't panic. Don't be evil.
--
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Ashar Voultoiz wrote:
We have a couple of bugs requiring shell access. They are mostly about
tweaking namespaces, enabling an extension, configuring mediawiki.
Well, more than a couple. :-)
It seems those bugs are mostly handled by RobH, Jeluf and myself. I am
wondering if we could create
I wrote the feature and I've never used $eg.
-Chad
On Jan 16, 2011 2:41 PM, Jeroen De Dauw jeroended...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey,
My point is that code review is an extension, so AFAIK should use $eg, not
$wg.
Cheers
--
Jeroen De Dauw
http://www.bn2vs.com
Don't panic. Don't be evil.
--
Jeroen De Dauw wrote:
Hey,
My point is that code review is an extension, so AFAIK should use $eg, not
$wg.
Cheers
[[Coding conventions]] was wrong. See r70755
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Um... I thought since that email discussion took place that sementic
no longer wanted their stuff deferred?
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 6:09 PM, K. Peachey p858sn...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
Um... I thought since that email discussion took place that sementic
no longer wanted their stuff deferred?
That's what I hear too. Then nobody reviews stuff and it ends
up deferred anyway.
-Chad
Maarten Dammers maar...@mdammers.nl wrote in message
news:4d32e0de.8020...@mdammers.nl...
On 8 June, 2011, Google, Facebook, Yahoo!, Akamai and Limelight
Networks will be amongst some of the major organisations that will offer
their content over IPv6 for a 24-hour test drive. The goal of the
A quick update on WYSIFTW, my augmented wikitext editor. (Please see
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WYSIFTW for details.)
Wikitext support is nearing completion. I added bold/italics a few
days ago, and yesterday it got some buttons to apply/remove such
markup from a selection. Just a few minutes
I don't entirely understand the point of this. The plan seems to be get
a large enough fraction of 'the internet' to make a change which breaks for
some people all at the same time, so that those people get angry with the
ISPs that haven't got off their arses to fix said breakage, rather than
In the early days, one could follow Recent changes on
a daily basis, to see if anything had changed. Nowadays
watchlists reduce the amount of information to those
pages one is interested in.
Many articles are soo long, and have been edited so many
times, that the history view is almost useless.
Op 17 jan 2011, om 01:35 heeft MZMcBride het volgende geschreven:
Magnus Manske wrote:
There is the question of what browsers/versions to test for. Should I
invest large amounts of time optimising performance in Firefox 3,
when
FF4 will probably be released before WYSIFTW, and everyone and
Krinkle wrote:
* @MZMcBride: https://jira.toolserver.org/browse/MAGNUS Component:
WYSIFTW
Noted here: http://www.mediawiki.org/w/index.php?diff=376424oldid=376410
MZMcBride
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 7:16 PM, Magnus Manske
magnusman...@googlemail.com wrote:
A quick update on WYSIFTW, my augmented wikitext editor. (Please see
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WYSIFTW for details.)
Shouldn't it be WYSIFWT?
___
Wikitech-l
On 17 January 2011 01:35, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote:
Magnus Manske wrote:
There is the question of what browsers/versions to test for.
It depends what your goal is.
Absolutely. As it stand now it's more of a proof of concept than anything
else. It's incredibly interesting
Op 17 jan 2011, om 02:12 heeft Anthony het volgende geschreven:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 7:16 PM, Magnus Manske
magnusman...@googlemail.com wrote:
A quick update on WYSIFTW, my augmented wikitext editor. (Please
see
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WYSIFTW for details.)
Shouldn't it be
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Lars Aronsson l...@aronsson.se wrote:
I think it would be very useful if I could highlight a
sentence, paragraph or section of an article and get a
reduced history view with only those edits that changed
that part of the page. What sorts of indexes would be
26 matches
Mail list logo
