On Tuesday, August 19, 2014, Jon Robson jdlrob...@gmail.com wrote:
I was curious to how generic the rating system is. For example would
it be possible to use such a thing on something like BetaFeatures or
was it specifically designed for extension rating?
I'm not sure how related is this,
On 20 August 2014 09:16, Quim Gil q...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I'm not sure how related is this, but Article Feedback allowed user rating
+ comment, and it was deployed in Wikimedia servers. Editors didn't find it
that useful for regular articles (too much extra work processing too little
value
I fully agree with Dan on that. I'd be much more interested in +/- votes on
feedback statements. I think that might be a direction worth exploring. A low
barrier like that might help bring a more complete picture of sentiment on
problems and ideas.
DJ
On 20 aug. 2014, at 19:08, Dan Garry
I believe Flow is going to or could be changed to solve this issue of
upvoting comments.
I was more interested in hypothetically if it was possible, I hadn't
really thought too much about whether it would be useful or not.
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Derk-Jan Hartman
As a MediaWiki tarball user, I'd *love* something to rate extensions -
even to show if anyone actually uses it and cares.
On 20 August 2014 19:14, Derk-Jan Hartman d.j.hartman+wmf...@gmail.com wrote:
I fully agree with Dan on that. I'd be much more interested in +/- votes on
feedback
Quim Gil wrote:
On Tuesday, August 19, 2014, Jon Robson jdlrob...@gmail.com wrote:
I was curious to how generic the rating system is. For example would
it be possible to use such a thing on something like BetaFeatures or
was it specifically designed for extension rating?
I'm not
Derk-Jan Hartman wrote:
I fully agree with Dan on that. I'd be much more interested in +/- votes on
feedback statements.
AFv5 already had this feature IIRC, but I think it lacked some way to
categorise and structurise messages, and to identify users who have a habit of
posting rubbish
