RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

Also just noticed that the TCP test results as well as not taking into account the TCP acknowledgements it also doesn't include the TCP header and IP header. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Hendry Sent: 20 October 2005 13:11 To:

RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

So you are thinking the asymmetry was a processing problem? Scott Reed Owner NewWays Wireless Networking Network Design, Installation and Administration www.nwwnet.net -- Original Message --- From: Paul Hendry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'WISPA General List'

RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

Paul, Was this turbo mode or standard? Thanks Dan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Hendry Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 8:11 AM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 UPDATE Just

Re: [WISPA] Licensed band radio manufacturers

I'am a radio manufacturer out of Bradenton Florida, We make 2.4 and 5.8 ghz 11 meg spread spectrum radios, plus we have a new generation radio coming out soon that will go up to 54 meg.These radios can either be outdoor mount or indoor mount. The out door are power over ethernet.Point to point,

Re: [WISPA] Licensed band radio manufacturers

Looking for licensed band, 100Mb, full duplex radios.  The reason is I'm looking at 100+ air miles and want to have as few hops as possible, with no interference.Thank you for your reply and I'll have to check out your products.On Oct 20, 2005, at 7:24 AM, robert maier wrote:I'am a radio

Re: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

Paul Hendry wrote: If your asymmetric performance with the RB532's is between 12 and 18mbps I wouldn't say your seeing similar performance as I am seeing 40mbps and 27.7mbps when transmitting and receiving at the same time using random (uncompressible) tcp based data. I just meant similar as

RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532

[EMAIL PROTECTED] with good -65 signal and yes it would seem that the earlier differences in upload/download speeds was CPU related as both up and down look to be very close. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of danlist Sent: 20 October 2005

Fw: [WISPA] Hurricane Wilma

fyi, urgent request from the FCC. At the bottom of this note I've copy and pasted the data from the attachment that Lauren had sent. I know many of the list won't allow the .doc attachment through laters, Marlon (509) 982-2181 Equipment sales (408)

Re: [WISPA] Licensed band radio manufacturers

Well, John I agree, i called the guy and got not available on his cell, and mailbox full on his v-mail, not much on his web site either. he really must be a busy man. Ron Wallace Hahnron, Inc. 220 S. Jackson St. Addison, MI 49220 Phone: (517) 547-8410 Mobile: (517) 605-4542 e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: [WISPA] Hurricane Wilma

Marlon Here is a list I haven't seen your post on yet: wisp mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.tog.net/mailman/listinfo/wisp You might want to send it there as well. George Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote: Hi All, The FCC is starting up their hurricane team again for Wilma.

[WISPA] Looks like the Senate has already figured out how to spend the money

that they will get from auctioning off the tv spectrum: http://tinyurl.com/8qz67 The measure provides $4.8 billion to help with the federal budget and allocates $1 billion for making communications by emergency personnel interoperable. If the auction raises more than $10 billion, the bill