Re: [WISPA] 4.9 use

2007-07-10 Thread Steve Stroh
Butch: From what I understand, frequency coordination for 4.9 GHz is local, though all transmitters in licensed spectrum are eventually registered with the FCC. I imagine 4.9 GHz is in various areas are coordinated through one of the longstanding public safety frequency coordination groups suc

[WISPA] RUS grant applications.

2007-07-10 Thread D. Ryan Spott
Has anyone here received a RUS grant? If so, would you be comfortable sharing a copy of your grant with me or the group? thanks! ryan Would you like to see your advertisement here? Let the WISPA Board know your

RE: [WISPA] 4.9 use

2007-07-10 Thread Butch Evans
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Patrick Leary wrote: Yes Chris, you are correct in your recollection; 4.9 GHz cannot be used for any commercial traffic, even in such a partnership. While on this subject, I have a possible project where 4.9GHz would be perfect. It is a single PD (municipal) with 3 build

Re: [WISPA] Trango Atlas 5010 PtP for sale?

2007-07-10 Thread Matt Liotta
Sure, we always have a stock of both connectorized and intergrated. -Matt Mark Nash wrote: I'm needing a CONNECTORIZED Trango Atlas 5010 PtP link. Anyone got one with or without antennas that you'd be willing to sell? Mark Nash UnwiredOnline.Net 350 Holly Street Junction City, OR 97448 http:/

[WISPA] Trango Atlas 5010 PtP for sale?

2007-07-10 Thread Mark Nash
I'm needing a CONNECTORIZED Trango Atlas 5010 PtP link. Anyone got one with or without antennas that you'd be willing to sell? Mark Nash UnwiredOnline.Net 350 Holly Street Junction City, OR 97448 http://www.uwol.net 541-998- 541-998-5599 fax -

RE: [WISPA] 4.9 use

2007-07-10 Thread Patrick Leary
Yes Chris, you are correct in your recollection; 4.9 GHz cannot be used for any commercial traffic, even in such a partnership. Patrick Leary AVP WISP Markets Alvarion, Inc. o: 650.314.2628 c: 760.580.0080 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT

[WISPA] 4.9 use

2007-07-10 Thread chris cooper
Can somebody refresh my memory It is illegal to use 4.9 Ghz for any commercial traffic, even in instance of public/private partnership and joint use of network - Yes? Thanks Chris Would you like to see your ad

Re: [WISPA] Tower Accident

2007-07-10 Thread Mike Hammett
A full body hazmat setup is always cheap insurance when you're around JohnnyO! - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: "Tim Wolfe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 10:17 AM Subject:

Re: [WISPA] Tower Accident

2007-07-10 Thread Tim Wolfe
JohnnyO, That suit was just to keep the bugs off. :-) When you have no place to sleep but a cot and the great wide open, the last thing I want to be is a snack for all of the Mississippi bugs and critters. I came down there to do Katrina relief, NOT to be a buffet for other insects, LOL!. (Tha

Re: [WISPA] 700 MHz - The Other View

2007-07-10 Thread Tom DeReggi
Steve, I actually read your arcticle this time, and have a further response. I agree with a large part of what you wrote. Although it may be unpopular or discouraging with many WISPs, it brings up some fair valid arguements and likely outcomes. My response is... Life is hard, and chances are

Re: [WISPA] Tower Accident

2007-07-10 Thread JohnnyO
I've seen Tim Wolfe dressed in what looked like a space suit :) Shoud have gotten him to go up a tower dressed like that and taken pictures ! CampWTF Founding Member :) JohnnyO - Original Message - From: "Justin S. Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'WISPA General List'" Sent: Tuesday,

RE: [WISPA] Tower Accident

2007-07-10 Thread Justin S. Wilson
I did read the post. But as my post said: "I could not imagine what would happen if it hit him on the head." "Could not imagine...if" Were the key words. Nothing can protect from all scenarios. If so tower climbers would be going up in full body suits with Kevlar. Would look like space men on t

Re: [WISPA] Tower Accident

2007-07-10 Thread Travis Johnson
If you read the post, the wrench hit the ladder and then bounced into his face. Even if he had a hard hat on (which I am guessing he did), it does not protect your face. Travis Microserv Justin S. Wilson wrote: One of the reasons climbers need to wear hard hats and be 100 percent tied off. I

RE: [WISPA] Tower Accident

2007-07-10 Thread Justin S. Wilson
One of the reasons climbers need to wear hard hats and be 100 percent tied off. I could not imagine what would happen if it hit him on the head. I have other opinions but OSHA might not like them so I will leave it at that. Glad your guy is okay. Justin

[WISPA] Tower for sale

2007-07-10 Thread Mike Hammett
I saw this tower for sale. http://tinyurl.com/ywev93 - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Would you like to see your advertisement here? Let the WISPA Board know your feelings

[WISPA] Tower Accident

2007-07-10 Thread Zak Wolfinger
Hi Folks,  We had what turned out to be a minor tower accident involving one of our tower climbers. It appears that he had attached a wrench to the wrong carabiner on another climbers harness.  When climber #2 detached the carabiner, the wrench fell without his knowledge.  Climber #2  was up