Has anyone implemented the DHCP Option 82 on their networks? From what I have
read, this would be great for forcing network addressable bridges to handout a
specified IP address and/or range of IPs.
_
Make distant family not so
Gang,
I'm FINALLY entering shake-down mode here and
now I've thinking more about stuff that I've not considered.
Have many of you mounted your CPE gear to customers
roof-top vent pipes?
If so are there any down-sides to doing so?
It seems like a pretty stable mount to me
but if there's a good
Depends what kind of vent pipe, I would not recommend mounting to PVC
pipes with any type of extension of additional pipe. We tried once and
customer complained when it got windy it would make noise through the
entire home. However, we successfully mount to Cast Iron vent pipes
often with no
There are a number of WiMAX 3.5 GHz solutions that will tune to 3.65
just fine. I doubt that we would need to force the forum to issue a new
profile for a frequency band that existing profiles already cover. As
far as I am concerned WiMAX in 3.65 GHz is here in all respects and is
not just
Tom,
I'd agree. I'm in no way advocating marketing that is deceptive in terms of
deliverables.
My main point is more that communications in marketing often involves using
buzzwords that coopt something someone knows for describing your product.
Even if that is, on a technical level, incorrect,
First, two thumbs up for Matt. 1) He's leading the way to expand with new
technologies. 2) He's clever enough to use maximize how he uses of Press
Releases.
With that said, in response to Clint, I had mixed feelings regarding the
release.
I didn't see a problem listing Wimax in the press
We do it all the time with rootennas.
Even extend the pipe up with a coupling and glue.
Dave Brenton wrote:
Gang,
I'm FINALLY entering shake-down mode here and
now I've thinking more about stuff that I've not considered.
Have many of you mounted your CPE gear to customers
roof-top vent
I guess I am a bit perplexed by this premise. Why would people in urban
areas pay for low bandwidth wireless broadband options? What problem
does this platform solve under that scenario?
Scriv
Mike Hammett wrote:
I would like to note that Redline echoed my thoughts on 3.65 GHz. It is not
We purchased a NetEqualizer last year, and we weren't impressed. It did not
perform well compared to the Emerging Technologies box we use. The rate limits
were not effectively enforced.
-Jake
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:16:46 -0600
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject:
Preferred vendor for vent pipe mounts?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: George Rogato [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 3:26 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Vent pipe
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 8:53 AM
Subject: Re: [SPAM] [WISPA] One Ring Networks To Rollout New WiMAX
I would like to note that Redline echoed my thoughts on 3.65 GHz. It is not
for rural providers and is not for high bandwidth providers. It's only
practical implementation is a dense urban environment with low throughput
clients.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
I too would say the same. Initially they did a good job, but soon after
they began to be in effective and variable. We contacted them and got very
little satisfaction. so, we are now trying mikrotiks at every tower. like
a 333... details will follow with our success or failure. We have
Part-15 has decided to charge for their mailing lists. I have
created a Mikrotik mailing list (information below). I will be
willing to create any other lists (even for gear I don't use) if
people will simply ask for it. You can email me directly if you
wish to have a list created.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 8:50 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Akamai
NetFlows will tell you exactly who you
Exactly.
What good is an AP that can only do 15 megs throughput in the city?
What good is an AP that can only do 2 - 5 miles in the country?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: John Scrivner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA
Hi,
Where is everyone buying their J-mounts for doing installs? I use
about 100 per month and my previous source no longer carries them.
thanks,
Travis
Microserv
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
Mike Hammett wrote:
Preferred vendor for vent pipe mounts?
Plumbing supply store. Buy a coupling the right size and type.
I should say, not all vent pipe mounts need the vent extended. And
sometimes, we can slip the cat 5 cable under the roof jack and into the
attic.
I wouldn't be adding
What is a J mount?
got a picture by chance?
Travis Johnson wrote:
Hi,
Where is everyone buying their J-mounts for doing installs? I use
about 100 per month and my previous source no longer carries them.
thanks,
Travis
Microserv
Ok, I was thinking maybe someone had a mount shaped like a j that got
you around the eve or something.
I buy the ones you just posted myself. usually the long ones.
Travis Johnson wrote:
The universal mounts that are often used with satellite TV installs.
It has a flat foot with a pipe
It's only practical implementation is a dense urban environment with low
throughput
I have a very hard time accepting that comment.
3.650 is more power than other unlicenced.
3.650 has better RF characteristics than 5.8G for NLOS and Distance.
Possibly even better than 2.4G (up for debate,
Wimax APs can go much fartehr than 2-5 miles.
You are spec'ing the distance limits of their advanced NLOS features.
In LOS, they can go just as far as any other unlicened gear.
I think its important to define country. If you are talking about Idaho
with houses 20 miles apart, yes, you'd be
I found that Tessco has the size (pipe width) that are the same as Trango
Dish Arms. We prefer that size.
To summarize, we prefer the smaller base with the thicker pole, but most
only sell the thicker pole with the huge thicker base, and the smaller width
pole with the smaller base.
So when we
I'm sure you don't want to turn this into a why you should use X thread,
but I am curious what you are having problems limiting with the other
devices you have tried?
Sam Tetherow
Sandhills Wireless
John Scrivner wrote:
I have been considering the Net Equalizer as a possible platform for
I find myself referring to WiMAX when describing our service.
We use the term broadband to describe our service. When asked to
explain the difference between our broadband and the others, it's
getting easy to say you have heard of WiMAX right? well this is what
we do we use microwave to reach
I guess as long as your over the air protocol conforms to 802.16 you can say
you are WiMax.
- Original Message -
From: George Rogato [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 8:25 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] One Ring Networks To Rollout New
I ran across this study a few weeks back:
http://www.bsu.edu/owrm/article/0,,47997--,00.html
Reading the executive summary, in their real world tests, NLOS/indoor
radios only worked about one mile. Outdoor mounted radios worked
maybe five miles. (I wasn't too impressed, in comparison
Yes Chuck the behives are loud and clear
Chuck McCown - 2 wrote:
From: Chuck McCown - 2
To: wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 7:44 PM
Subject: test
I think I subscribed but have never monitored WISPA before today. Is ?this
list alive? Is there a [EMAIL
The only benefit of 3.65 is, additional spectrum. And that will get
used up fairly quickly I'm sure.
We need more.
John Valenti wrote:
I ran across this study a few weeks back:
http://www.bsu.edu/owrm/article/0,,47997--,00.html
Reading the executive summary, in their real world
WiMax is sure getting lots of press. Especially at CES. Funny, they are
talking up the Sprint roll out but Sprint has bailed. Still smoke and
mirrors compared to Canopy but I guess we might as well capitalize on the
buzz.
While blathering on here, a business mentor told me long ago to
Hi,
I don't seem to be able to log in to reset the listserv to send me a digest
daily. Can you advise what to do?
Thank you Don
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David E. Smith
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 1:14 AM
DFcco.com
Mike Bushard, Jr
Wireless Network Engineer
320-256-WISP (9477)
320-256-9478 Fax
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 5:45 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] sources
Hi,
Where
I'm wondering the same thing, Chuck. It is such a good list, so many answers
can be had. I am going to try and talk the boss man into paying for it, but
I don't know if he will. It's really amazing what he will/wont spend money
on...
WISPA should create Vendor specific lists
Mike Bushard, Jr
If the 'other' list is the part-15 list. I think you will see the
private lists drop down to the core part-15 members. Michael was talking
about having one general list open to everyone and you will probably see
more people there. But for the experienced operators (the people that
answer the
Question, since I have not previously been monitoring wispa, how tolerant is
the wispa group to folks like me dropping hints about new products or AF or
things like that? I read all the rules and mission statements etc of wispa
and don't want to go against convention. Is there a list blast
I totally agree. I have known about Michael's plan to go pay for about a
week now. He was going to make the announcement in Salt Lake City on
Thursday. But I guess he wanted to break it today so there wouldn't be so
much shock at the show.
I truly wish him the best too. I have used his
Personally, all I have seen are last generation. What I'd like to know is
which have evolved to tackle the trends of newer network designs.
How many support multiple outbound paths correctly? Are any multi-layer
yet, from the perspective of doing bandwdith management per sector attached
to it,
Does any one have any recent experience with squid cashing server software
http://www.squid-cache.org/
One of our customers set it up across their network and thought it was
super easy to set up and doing a bang up job for about 300 users.
Is there any real world experience out there?
Will it
38 matches
Mail list logo