A software watchdog timer is not the same thing as a hardware watchdog timer.
And SNMP has nothing to do with either.
Tom S.
- Original Message -
From: jai...@budget.net
To: Tom Sharples ; WISPA General List
Sent: Saturday, December 19, 2009 9:03 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiq
Ya, and further proof it should work is that it works at my office on the
same tower. I cant blame their cisco because I bypassed it with my laptop.
No proxy server. Everything goes through the RB450G. So, the only
differences are the WRAP on the tower and the CPE. I'll try the CPE next.
Will advis
To be fair, the only issues I've had is with NIB units. Once the unit is
installed and working, they've been very stable. -RickG
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 8:40 PM, Mike wrote:
> Thanks Bob, Rick and Tom for your thoughts.
>
> My hands itch when I'm uncertain about something. It might just be
> th
lol! I'd say "you know what I meant" but then that would defeat the purpose
:)
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Robert West wrote:
> As in bigger than a Pico? :)
>
> Or is that a Bullico? Hmm...
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun.
Anything is possible...who though we'd land on a moon or communicate via
invisible waves of energy?
Having said that - I'll believe it when I see it =)
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
"The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide
Unless there is a rouge NAT statement someplace, I do not see anything
specific that would be causing this (as described)
What about a proxy server ? Are all connections heading out the NAT IP
or only HTTP?
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 4:40 AM, RickG wrote:
> The thing is they had a bridge from the o
BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12Well
Please don't take me wrong on this but your statement (b) bothers me.
You are either running a very old version of Air OS or you have no
clue what your talking about. UBNT has support for SNMP which I use
to monitor not only uptime
We use the pcengines Alix board and usually Wistron or Ubiquiti miniPCI
radios. Generally that has been an extremely stable and reliable
combination.
Tom S.
- Original Message -
From: "Mike"
To: "Tom Sharples" ; "WISPA General List"
Sent: Saturday, December 19, 2009 5:40 PM
Subject:
NS2s have been pretty good to me.
I've read about issues with the newer product line, but not tried them myself.
On 12/19/09, Philip Dorr wrote:
> The rocket dish looks identical to a Pac wireless two foot dish
> painted white with a drain hole pre-drilled in the mounting ring and
> RP-SMA conne
The rocket dish looks identical to a Pac wireless two foot dish
painted white with a drain hole pre-drilled in the mounting ring and
RP-SMA connectors on the fed horn; Even the same ray dome fits it.
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Robert West wrote:
> I haven't had issues with reboots on the r
I haven't had issues with reboots on the rockets but the bonus with them is
they have a reset button on the PoE down on the ground for when I try
something stupid from the ground and I screw it up... I was very glad
to see that.
But yeah, you should feel okay about the Rockets and the sectors
As in bigger than a Pico? :)
Or is that a Bullico? Hmm...
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of RickG
Sent: Saturday, December 19, 2009 7:36 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti ready for prime t
Thanks Bob, Rick and Tom for your thoughts.
My hands itch when I'm uncertain about something. It might just be
the dry air.
Are the Ubiquity radios more apt to require reboots than some of the
other mainstream CPE? Seems to be a common thread here.
I am most interested in the rocket stuff, a
Speaking of firmware, has anyone tried DD-WRT on a UBNT?
-RickG
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Robert West wrote:
> Mike,
>
> The Bullets with the loose lan connectors was supposed to be a problem in
> the first few production runs of the new ones so that problem hopefully is
> gone. UBNT is
Same here. For me, I am going to go slowly with a small project. Actually, I
just did a small project with UBNT and it went well. So, the next project
will be a bit bigger and so on. -RickG
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Mike wrote:
> I was almost ready to pull the trigger on some Ubiquiti equ
Absolutely true. They are trained in the art of the "Magic Reboot".
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Tom Sharples
Sent: Saturday, December 19, 2009 3:25 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti ready for
My biggest concern with these units is (a) lack of mechanical robustness -
little plastic bits leak or break off quite easily and (b) lack of a
hardware watchdog timer which personally I think is essential esp. when
you're using "development stage" firmware. We did most of the work to port
our
Saw this on TowerTalk, had me scratching my head.Anyone familiar with
these antennas or is this the next WiFi+ B.S.?
http://www.rfdesignline.com/howto/showArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=F1SQHL23DOWTN
QE1GHPCKHWATMY32JVN?articleID=222001586
Robert West
Just Micro Digital Services In
I'm with ya on all that, Jamie. We've had minor issues but I expected
things to not be perfect, they never are with version 1.0! The trade off is
worth it, for me anyhow.
Bob-
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of jai...@bu
We use all UBNT and I have been very happy with the equipment.
Tower has 2 Rocket M5s With 120 sectors, backhaul is Rocket M5s with
the Rocket Dish. CPEs are Nano M5. Durring testing at 4 Miles with
CPE to AP I was able to sustain symmetrical speeds of 75M to our
test server on the other end o
Mike,
The Bullets with the loose lan connectors was supposed to be a problem in
the first few production runs of the new ones so that problem hopefully is
gone. UBNT is taking care of the ones with the bad solder jobs but it's
still a pain in the butt to ship and wait for the returns. I'd feel s
We have used the "old" nano stations for customer owned ptp links, so
far so good. But we have not use them for our own network
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...
I was almost ready to pull the trigger on some Ubiquiti equipment for
a new project. The scent of low price is alluring. Then I start
reading about connectors pulling out, connectors not soldered on
properly, and the wrong boot code on boards.
Is it too early? Should I wait a bit before I di
And then a mistake can easily be made!
Good product though, I wonder how many were flash wrong by the "new" employee?
:)
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Philip Dorr
Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 9:40 PM
To: WISPA
The thing is they had a bridge from the other tower and it was working. The
only thing thats changed is the tower. RIP is on RB450G and WRAP's. Dont
know about Cisco as it is the customers and I dont have control. They also
have ICMP turned off amongst other things. Should I still see it?
Yes, NAT
25 matches
Mail list logo
