I put up a temporary install of a UBNT rocket / sector combination, and it's
at one of my regular AP spots, it sees quite a bit of noise.
using a nanobridge as a cpe, and with only one other client online... I
was able, at 4 miles, to get an internal speed test of 120mbit.This is
using
What about TCP?
---
Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik WISP Support Services
Office: 314-735-0270 Website: http://www.linktechs.net
LIVE On-Line Mikrotik Training - Author of Learn RouterOS
TCP tests are typically about 60% to 75% of 'air' speed.
By 'internal speed' test MDK is referring to built in radio to radio
iperf test...
Regards
Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet Telecom
On 6/28/2010 1:15 PM, Dennis Burgess wrote:
What about TCP?
With all of our testing... the NanoBridge is good for 4 to 6 miles...
8miles is a bit far for the NBM5
for that you may have better luck with NB-25 or the Powerbridge.
Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet Telecom
On 6/28/2010 12:03 PM, MDK wrote:
I put up a temporary install of a UBNT rocket /
The easy resolve for that problem, if you have to have GFIs, is to add a
small APC UPS after the GFI and use GOOD ones!
_
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Blair Davis
Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 10:23 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re:
Travis,
We not only looked at Vegas, not only did Vegas come in a close 3rd in
the survey where 77 members answered back in October 2009 but we
actually (3 board members) went there and met with people, trust me
Vegas was on our radar. It wasn't first though and an even larger
conflict was
Robert,
Are you on the Promotion Committee? These are all important inputs we
need when we make decisions, it wasn't the board who decided, they
followed the recommendations of the Promotion Committee. We have no
intention of having another summer show, we have learned a lot in this
our
How about a west coast regional 2 or 3 day WISPA cruise like SF to LA ,
or just Long Beach to Catalina
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Forbes Mercy
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 11:44 AM
To: WISPA General List
Chuck,
You wouldn't get any objection from me, are you going on the Wireless
Cruise this fall?
Forbes
On 6/28/2010 1:57 PM, Chuck Profito wrote:
How about a west coast regional 2 or 3 day WISPA cruise like SF to LA ,
or just Long Beach to Catalina
-Original Message-
From:
Isn't the cruise in the Gulf?
...just sayin'...
~V~
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Forbes Mercy
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2010 4:06 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] What are the Challenges?
Chuck,
You
Chuck,
I am guessing the next event after the Oxford Show in Dallas will be a
Regional Event on the West or East Coasts or at least a centralized location
along the coasts. We will probably do another survey to see which coast
wins!
Rick
-Original Message-
From:
Even if it smells really badly at least we won't run out of oil, just
skim a little off...
On 6/28/2010 2:14 PM, St. Louis Broadband wrote:
Isn't the cruise in the Gulf?
...just sayin'...
~V~
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
Thats standard procedure for me. I put in line conditioners too.
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Mike m...@aweiowa.com wrote:
The easy resolve for that problem, if you have to have GFIs, is to add a
small APC UPS after the GFI and use GOOD ones!
_
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
I agree. All of my other towers do NOT have GFCI and do NOT have any issues.
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 9:24 PM, lakel...@gbcx.net wrote:
We have had problems over the years at sites using GFCI's. In all cases we
removed them and hardwired the equipment.
Way too many service interuptions with
I suppose you have to weigh between possibly losing an occational
power supply or outages causing multiple truck rolls.
What I really want to know is using a GFCI outlet standard proceedure
for tower installations?
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Tom Sharples tsharp...@qorvus.com wrote:
They
Ground is good. This is a very simple clean install:
[power]--[UPS]--{POE]--[radio]
My local electrician says no need for GFCI, so out it goes!
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 12:41 AM, Robert West
robert.w...@just-micro.com wrote:
Check the install. GFCI is ground fault. It should always trip if the
No. I can't remember the last time I saw a GFCI at a tower site except for a
service outlet on the outside of a shelter.
My understanding they are only required in wet locations where corded devices
are used.
Hardwire a UPS into the circuit and throw the GFCI out.
NEC does not require GFCI's
So are you going are you gonna stay there with Rikeesha? :)
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 12:41 AM, Robert West
robert.w...@just-micro.com wrote:
We originally picked St. Louis
With total and absolute respect for the board, we had an online discussion
of where and why among all of us and St. Louis
GFCIs do nothing to protect your equipment from surges, spikes, etc. All
they do is interrupt the circuit if the current flowing on the hot
conductor is not equal to the current flowing on the neutral conductor,
which indicates that some current is leaking to ground.
You need a TVSS to arrest
Not only that but the systems tend to work much nicer when they are run
within the design specs
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.com
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 9:12 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Maximum
Right on all counts Charles,
1. I would've put it off longer but with the price going up I wanted
the discount.
2. Yes, easy to forget with so much going on.
3. For me, the compelling stuff is to meet more people in the
industry. The fact that the whole WISPA Board is going to be there
convinced
Hi All,
We're trying to get some newly assigned IP addresses to work right.
199.204.200.x thru 199.204.208.x
My upstream tells me that their upstream is trying to work with ATT on the
issue (that's where a trace route dies).
We can get to most internet sites, but those within ATT's network
Hi Alan,
We're in the process of doing this too.
We're going to run a bridged backbone (mostly) with routing AP's. Mikrotik
in our case.
For IP space we went to ARIN and got our own (two upstreams on opposite
sides of the network).
We were able to get 8 class c's this way. We're also
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Marlon K. Schafer o...@odessaoffice.com
wrote:
Hi Alan,
We're in the process of doing this too.
We're going to run a bridged backbone (mostly) with routing AP's. Mikrotik
in our case.
For IP space we went to ARIN and got our own (two upstreams on opposite
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Marlon K. Schafer o...@odessaoffice.com
wrote:
Hi All,
We're trying to get some newly assigned IP addresses to work right.
199.204.200.x thru 199.204.208.x
My upstream tells me that their upstream is trying to work with ATT on the
issue (that's where a
Keep pushing your upstream(s) to get it fixed. Daily calls.
We had the same issue with our 69.20.128 block about 6 years ago...
apparently the entire 69 block used to be unrouteable IP space until
ARIN opened it up and starting giving it out to poor suckers (like
me)... the problem was most
One way to conserve IP space is to route a subnet to each tower rather
than each AP. Have every AP plugged into a switch at the tower, and then
into a router before it leaves that tower. That way you can use up the
entire subnet before adding another. ;)
Travis
Microserv
Alan Bryant wrote:
The real question is: Is Stuart going to book a tour?
roflol
ciao,
Stuart Pierce
- Original Message -
From: Rick Harnish rharn...@wispa.org
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2010 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] The hitch hikers guide to St. Louis.
I'll be there.
I've not see the speaker's roster yet so I'm not sure I'll get much out of
it or not.
To me, the big draw for a show is being able to hear from my peers and see
my friends.
I can talk to a vendor any time. It's those that are doing what I do,
successfully, that I want to
It is all on the registration page Marlon, has been for about a month. It
changes as we refine the topics and speakers.
http://wispaslrm.eventbrite.com
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
Sent:
gici devices generally suck.
The only thing I've seen that's worse is the new Arcfault units.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: RickG rgunder...@gmail.com
To: wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 3:48 PM
Subject: [WISPA] GFCI outlet trips
Anyone had any issues with a GFCI
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 07:29:16PM -0700, Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
Hi All,
We're trying to get some newly assigned IP addresses to work right.
199.204.200.x thru 199.204.208.x
My upstream tells me that their upstream is trying to work with ATT on the
issue (that's where a trace route
Hiya Alan,
I'm not on any NANOG lists. Don't even know what that is.
I'm NOT the router guy here. I'm the wireless guy. (Butch is the router
guy for my company.)
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Alan Bryant a...@gtekcommunications.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo
Well worth being on if you have issues ...
On Jun 28, 2010, at 11:51 PM, Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
Hiya Alan,
I'm not on any NANOG lists. Don't even know what that is.
I'm NOT the router guy here. I'm the wireless guy. (Butch is the
router
LOL, I'm with you. I didnt even look at the vendor list, just who is
going to be there. Now I see your name :)
I'll make it a point to find you! -RickG
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 11:08 PM, Marlon K. Schafer
o...@odessaoffice.com wrote:
I'll be there.
I've not see the speaker's roster yet so I'm
Would you leave the AP in bridge mode and let the tower router take
care of the routing?
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Travis Johnson t...@ida.net wrote:
One way to conserve IP space is to route a subnet to each tower rather
than each AP. Have every AP plugged into a switch at the tower,
Yes.
Travis
RickG wrote:
Would you leave the AP in bridge mode and let the tower router take
care of the routing?
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Travis Johnson t...@ida.net wrote:
One way to conserve IP space is to route a subnet to each tower rather
than each AP. Have every AP
37 matches
Mail list logo
