What is the general consensus in regards to advertising AS number space
for business/non-profit client that has their own allocation of space
from ARIN? Let's say the customer has service from you as a backup and
wants to transition to you as a primary and continue to use their own IP
space.
It's just a slightly different configuration and usually carriers either
don't charge or charge something minimal like $50/mth or a setup fee.
Regards,
Chuck
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Bobby Burrow brbur...@gmail.com wrote:
What is the general consensus in regards to advertising AS
@wispa.orgmailto:wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Advertising IP space for Business Customers
It's just a slightly different configuration and usually carriers either don't
charge or charge something minimal like $50/mth or a setup fee.
Regards,
Chuck
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Bobby Burrow
brbur
This is the way it looked to me, too. I just asked the guy at
Windstream who is dealing with it. He said...
Windstream has two Tier 1 providers, Level 3 and AT T . This allows
us to have two separate drains to the internet backbone. These two
providers have two separate processes for setting up
of the very few protections BGP has.
Justin
-Original Message-
From: Roger Howard g5inter...@gmail.com
Reply-To: ro...@g5i.net, WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 10:56:34 -0600
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Advertising ARIN IPs via BGP
...@gmail.com
Reply-To: ro...@g5i.net, WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 10:56:34 -0600
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Advertising ARIN IPs via BGP
This is the way it looked to me, too. I just asked the guy at
Windstream who is dealing with it. He said
wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 3:17:26 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Advertising ARIN IPs via BGP
http://fixedorbit.com/AS/7/AS7029.htm
Nope, Level 3 and ATT is all they have. One they complete the migration
of Paetec, they'll have a much more substantial
Two months ago, we received a /21 direct allocation of IPv4 addresses from ARIN.
We have two geographically diverse upstream providers. One is ATT.
The other is Windstream.
The Windstream circuit is considerably cheaper per meg, than the ATT
circuit. We are wanting to do away with ATT.
After
This is the reason that ATT costs more and Windstream (which I have
never heard of until this message) is cheap. You get what you pay for...
a company with real tech support and engineers that know what they are
doing and get it done, and some other company that doesn't. :)
Travis
Microserv
At 1/26/2012 10:22 PM, Travis wrote:
This is the reason that ATT costs more and Windstream (which I have
never heard of until this message) is cheap. You get what you pay for...
a company with real tech support and engineers that know what they are
doing and get it done, and some other company
You don't get out much, do you? :-p
Windstream is a rural ILEC in many parts of the country, but has
recently purchased Paetec, KDL\Norlight and I believe some others as
well. They are one of the more aggressive aggregators in the past couple
years. By some measures, they are one of the top 10
Based on the information on robtex.com [1], windstream us ATT as one of
their upstreams. Windstream need to advise all of their upstream providers
of any new prefixes which are to be advertised through their network, so
there may be some truth to what they are saying although two months is a
This should have nothing to do with ATT. It sounds like Windstream has
incorrectly assumed that you are trying to announce something
owned/controlled by ATT, or did you also ask them to allow your ATT
/24s through as well? If so, you might be able to get them to allow the
ARIN /21 before
We're working on a new ad campign for the new locations that we can now hit
that we couldn't before, thanks to several new tower sites. Does anyone have
any good direct mail material? I hate the stuff we've been using, but I'm
having trouble coming up with anything better.
BTW -- has anyone
Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2007 2:27 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Advertising
Hi,
This issue with ComCast and their p2p connection blocking brings up
another issue I would like to discuss... false advertising.
I have a competitor
I used to have a 192k SDSL connection to the Internet. When the price
went up to $129 per month, I ended up going to a cable modem that was
rated at 6 meg downloads. My wife was very vocal about how much slower
the cable modem was. I don't know what they do, but DNS lookups are
horrible on the
Tom DeReggi wrote:
First off, in true technical theory, it is my opinion, that Latency
=speed, Transfer rate = capacity. Latency is the speed in which one
packet goes from point A to Point B. Transfer rate is the quantity of
packets that can be transfered within a specific time. Therefore
@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2007 2:27 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Advertising
Hi,
This issue with ComCast and their p2p connection blocking brings up
another issue I would like to discuss... false advertising.
I have a competitor that is selling up to 4meg down by 1meg up for
$34.95
21, 2007 4:27 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Advertising
Hi,
This issue with ComCast and their p2p connection blocking brings up
another issue I would like to discuss... false advertising.
I have a competitor that is selling up to 4meg down by 1meg up for
$34.95 with free installation and no contract
over the
telco!
I think I need more coffee...
ryan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Luke Pack
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 7:36 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Advertising
I have seen many advertisements be sneaky
- Original Message - From: Travis Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2007 2:27 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Advertising
Hi,
This issue with ComCast and their p2p connection blocking brings up
another issue I would like to discuss... false
- Original Message - From: Travis Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2007 4:27 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Advertising
Hi,
This issue with ComCast and their p2p connection blocking brings up
another issue I would like to discuss
]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 11:29 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Advertising
Marlon,
We already did that... with CableOne and with the WiMax competitor...
however, a lot of people don't check that before they read the ad in the
newspaper that says 4meg wireless
Tom DeReggi wrote:
[ a nice sales pitch ]
Cust-Is it faster than DSL or Cable?
Sales- The true measure of speed is Latency, and our latency
outperforms both Cable and DSL. Thats why you won't see a latency spec
in our competitor's advertisements
Just out of curiosity, do you have one of
List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Advertising
At 9:36 AM -0500 10/22/07, Luke Pack wrote:
I have seen many advertisements be sneaky. By this I mean they
give real information with the intent to mislead. I take an
approach of honesty in my service. If the customer doesn't
understand, I will take
-
From: David E. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 5:39 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Advertising
Tom DeReggi wrote:
[ a nice sales pitch ]
Cust-Is it faster than DSL or Cable?
Sales- The true measure of speed is Latency, and our
to the home. But we aren't in that
generation today.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message - From: David E. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 5:39 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA
Hi,
This issue with ComCast and their p2p connection blocking brings up
another issue I would like to discuss... false advertising.
I have a competitor that is selling up to 4meg down by 1meg up for
$34.95 with free installation and no contract. Another competitor is
doing up to 2meg for
I know this question will get a lot of
varied response, but I
figured I'd throw it out there.
I'm in the middle of investing / biz
plans, etc... Trying to
come up with a number for what we would
theoretically spend to
reinvent the company so-to-speak and get
the name known.
Looking at radio /
29 matches
Mail list logo
