I think the r52hn is ideal for a cheap CPE radio. Cheap and works well. It
does N, too, but that's besides this discussion. Just not quite up there in
terms of a ptp link.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 3:
Actually, in the technical specificationsthe R52HN claims to be better
than a XR5. I have not used any R52HN for comparison.
RX Sensitivity at 54mbit is -80 with R52HN vs -74 for XR5.
Regards,
Chuck
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Josh Luthman
wrote:
> My experience shows the complete o
I hear ya. I know a lot of people swear by them. I just know I have
tried them 4-5 different times and they never work as well as I think
they should. I can pull it out and use a CM9 or R52Hn and get better
receive by a couple of db or more.
On 2/14/2011 2:46 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
My exp
My experience shows the complete opposite and all other reports have agreed
with me. Not arguing, just emerging facts.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Data Technology wrote:
> I have tried those i
I have tried those in the past and not had good luck with them. They
don't seem to be as sensitive as other cards.
I used to use mostly cm9's but have been using the MT R52Hn cards. You
get the power and they seem to receive better than the XR5's.
LaRoy
On 2/14/2011 2:26 PM, Josh Luthman wro
That's the one, but I would DEFINITELY use an XR5 for a ptp link.
Voltage/board depends on your particular link.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Butch Evans wrote:
> On 02/14/2011 01:19 PM, Josh Lu
On 02/14/2011 01:19 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
> For 7 miles? Use the 23dbi ARC things. I get them from Streakwave.
> Jut ask for ARC wireless 23dbi panel/enclosures. Very lightweight
> solution (compared to a two foot dish!)
http://tinyurl.com/4jqqq2h is a complete system (with routerboard,
r
* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Data Technology
> *Sent:* Monday, February 14, 2011 11:50 AM
>
> *To:* WISPA General List
> *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Strange RF disconnect problem
>
>
>
> Looking at these panels, it looks
Technology
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 11:50 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Strange RF disconnect problem
Looking at these panels, it looks like you would not easily change a card or
board on the tower.
Can these panels be swapped out without having to re-align?
LaRoy
On 2/14
h compared to the time lost
>> picking at it.
>>
>>
>>
>> I'd rather test and troubleshoot at the bench.
>>
>>
>>
>> - Jerry
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org
>> [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
>> *On Beha
t:* Monday, February 14, 2011 10:14 AM
*To:* WISPA General List
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Strange RF disconnect problem
If it were me, I would check that LMR and all that other
garbage. Use the ARC 23dbi panel/enclosures. You'll lose 10dbi
(less because of LMR400, connector
> [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
> *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman
> *Sent:* Monday, February 14, 2011 10:14 AM
> *To:* WISPA General List
> *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Strange RF disconnect problem
>
>
>
> If it were me, I would check that LMR and all that other garbage. Use
:* Re: [WISPA] Strange RF disconnect problem
If it were me, I would check that LMR and all that other garbage. Use
the ARC 23dbi panel/enclosures. You'll lose 10dbi (less because of
LMR400, connectors, pigtails, N connectors) but you'll have less to
worry about when ice gets on the an
neral List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Strange RF disconnect problem
If it were me, I would check that LMR and all that other garbage. Use the ARC
23dbi panel/enclosures. You'll lose 10dbi (less because of LMR400, connectors,
pigtails, N connectors) but you'll have less to worry about when i
If it were me, I would check that LMR and all that other garbage. Use the
ARC 23dbi panel/enclosures. You'll lose 10dbi (less because of LMR400,
connectors, pigtails, N connectors) but you'll have less to worry about when
ice gets on the antenna (IME last week - none).
Everything is enclosed and
After posting I recalculated what the signal strength should be and it
turns out to be mid 50's.
So I guess there is defiantly wrong in the rf system some where.
On 2/14/2011 12:00 PM, Data Technology wrote:
> Sorry for the long post but I need some suggestions here guys.
>
> Customer has a 7.3
Sorry for the long post but I need some suggestions here guys.
Customer has a 7.3 mile 5ghz link.
MT 433AH on one end and MT 411AH on the other.
Version 4.16 on both units.
Both units have MT R52Hn cards.
28 db grids on both ends with 6-10ft lmr400 jumper.
Signal strength is -65 to -65 on
17 matches
Mail list logo
