Rick,
Are these supposed to be my comments? I'm not sure who you were
referring
to. I can't find the article you have pasted here, if you thought that I
made those comments it wasn't me ...never been down under :-)
Thank You,
Brian Webster
-Original Message-
From: RickG
No Sir. I was just simply submitting the article to the list for
comment on without reference to anything else discussed in the past.
It appears your email addy was added by accident. At any rate, I
apologize if anything else appeared to be implied. Of course, your
comments are welcome as well.
- Original Message -
From: Scottie Arnett sarn...@info-ed.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2009 12:17 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] More FCC news
Typical, how many can believe that these guys pushing this: The plan
would involve the FCC buying
Typical, how many can believe that these guys pushing this: The plan would
involve the FCC buying spectrum back from TV folk and
then auctioning it off to wireless folk make at least a $100,000 clear a
year? Plus the lobbyist and what they make? We pay their salaries as American
citizens! Most
, October 07, 2008 11:27 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax world news?
Nothing terribly exciting at WiMAX World
WiNOG, on the other hand...
grin
-Charles
Charles Wu
President
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cell: 773-457-0718 * office: 773-667-4585 x2500
16W235 83rd Street, Suite A, Burr
List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax world news?
Well, lets hear it! I was unable to attend, even tough I really wanted!
Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Ehman
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 2:42 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax world news?
WiMAX World was a bunch of mobile pipedream stuff with an emphasis on in the
clouds technology roadmaps, haha.
What most people got out of WiNOG was the ability to speak with other
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jeff Ehman
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 2:52 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax world news?
WiNOG did have the Wu Wu special
2 Parts Technical Jargon
1 Part Credit Card Processing ON DISCOUNT
:)
Some humor for a great Wednesday
for a great Wednesday afternoon
-Jeff
General Manager
CTI
(773) 667-4585 x2509
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jeff Ehman
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 2:42 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax world news?
WiMAX
Nothing terribly exciting at WiMAX World
WiNOG, on the other hand...
grin
-Charles
Charles Wu
President
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cell: 773-457-0718 * office: 773-667-4585 x2500
16W235 83rd Street, Suite A, Burr Ridge, IL 60527 * tel: 773.667.4585 fax:
773.326.4641
-Original Message-
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Larry Yunker
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 6:52 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] More FCC News - Net Neutrality
I got a water bill last month for $210 and wasn't angry. My bill the
month before was only $30 dollars. I
Message -
From: David Hulsebus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 7:21 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] More FCC News - Net Neutrality
If the 10 % didn't know what their usage patterns were I probably
wouldn't implement this cap. I have a many
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Scottie Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 10:38 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] More FCC News - Net Neutrality
More on this...Many of us have not already
Yet anither reason us (WISP) and all Cable and DSL(telcos) will go to a
usage based systemno more all you can eat. I am not sure, but I bet
they (FCC) have no control on us in that circumstance.
I would have to disagree. It would appear that in this case, the FCC would
be treating an
PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Larry Yunker
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 9:09 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] More FCC News - Net Neutrality
Yet anither reason us (WISP) and all Cable and DSL(telcos) will go to a
usage based systemno more all you can eat. I am not sure, but I bet
they (FCC
7:00 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] More FCC News - Net Neutrality
Well, what you have to do is include a number of gigs that cover typical
and
slightly above typical usage. Structure it so only power users or P2P
users
would top that usage.
For some new projects I'm working on, I'm considering
.
insert witty tagline here
- Original Message -
From: Scottie Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 8:31 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] More FCC News - Net Neutrality
From a business standpoint, I do not see why
usage based means tiers of prices... No matter what you tell people or how
you warn them, if your bill this month is $100 and last month it was $25,
they WILL BE ANGRY.
Further, automating systems to bill per gig is kind of a pain.
The answer, then, I guess is... convenience.
We were
I got a water bill last month for $210 and wasn't angry. My bill the
month before was only $30 dollars. I knew what 25,000 gallons of water
to fill my pool was going to cost me.
I have 60 customers that I loose money on every month. I can afford the
implementation for what I will gain in
I got a water bill last month for $210 and wasn't angry. My bill the
month before was only $30 dollars. I knew what 25,000 gallons of water
to fill my pool was going to cost me.
The problem with that analogy is two fold:
(1) you can physically see 25,000 gallons of water that you intentionally
] On
Behalf Of Larry Yunker
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 6:52 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] More FCC News - Net Neutrality
I got a water bill last month for $210 and wasn't angry. My bill the
month before was only $30 dollars. I knew what 25,000 gallons of water
to fill my pool
- Original Message -
From: Larry Yunker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 6:52 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] More FCC News - Net Neutrality
I got a water bill last month for $210 and wasn't angry. My bill the
month before was only $30 dollars
-
From: David Hulsebus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 2:10 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] More FCC News - Net Neutrality
I got a water bill last month for $210 and wasn't angry. My bill the
month before was only $30 dollars. I knew what 25,000
Bow to the east each morning and recite...
Oh great Father in Washington, thou knowest all, divinest all, we are
unworthy to have thy great protection and wisdom...
Or, we could start telling the FCC they're full of it...
insert witty tagline here
-
It's set to be vote on officially next Friday. This is a disturbing
decision if it implies that ISPs will no longer be allowed to control P2P
traffic flow originating from their own customers on their own networks.
I agree. Will this also mean that we will no longer be allowed to
block ports
I have said this over and over in various forums: Throttling/shaping
on a per-application basis is not a good idea. Bandwidth caps and
pay-per-bit are the correct way to handle bandwidth hogs. The FCC
doesn't care how you limit, as long as you apply it equally to all
bandwidth types.
for not
telling folks. I hope that full disclosure allows us to content to do as we
wish.
- Original Message -
From: Forrest W. Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 4:57 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] More FCC News - Net Neutrality
I
This whole thing makes me wounder...
What about when it is spelled out to the user before they sign up?
I inform all users that we reserve the right to limit traffic,
especially peer to peer traffic. I also tell them that we do not
support or recommend VoIP services. They are welcome to try
Yet anither reason us (WISP) and all Cable and DSL(telcos) will go to a
usage based systemno more all you can eat. I am not sure, but I bet they
(FCC) have no control on us in that circumstance.
Just my 1 pence.
Scottie
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Blair Davis
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 6:13 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] More FCC News - Net Neutrality
This whole thing makes me wounder...
What about when it is spelled out to the user before they sign up
penetration. I know I have been waiting for it since 2002. Let the NEW games
begin!
Scott
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Scottie Arnett
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 10:04 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] More FCC News
Can you give more details on the versions that require a license key?
What will they cost? What features will they have specifically? What is
FIPS 197? Could this FIPS 197 service allow for service to medical
facilities also? I would like to be able to approach the hospitals,
doctor's offices,
This is great news. In looking at some info about the bills, I am wondering if want to ask for some of the whitespace to be made quasi-licensed, not unlicensed. I would love to have some channels that I know will not be used by anyone within 50 miles of where I use them. Not sure what it
Title: smartBridges American Road Shows
Thanks, Marlon.
Somebody should tellsmartBridges to put
Ottawa, Silicon Valley NORTH, and the hub of anything wireless, on their travel
list. Heck, I will even help them coordinate it!
Linda
Linda PondPresidentCustomer
Connects"Bridging Technology
Yes, I find that interesting as well.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Dawn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org;
isp-wireless@isp-wireless.com
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 4:33 PM
Subject:
are $300 and the
software for the mini-pci is $700
Dan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of John Scrivner
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 5:36 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] In the News.
Rick doesn't like
36 matches
Mail list logo