Few things of info:
- 3.5Ghz is not not license free in the, 50Mhz at 3.65 is
but there are issue with using this with WiMax
- WiMax doesNOT do any more at 2.4Ghz or 5Ghz then
theproducts on the market today in reference to RF not
protocol.
- The WiMax protocol has many cool features but are
Hi all,
I'm going to WCA in Washington DC later this month. Anyone else going?
Matt Larsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Charles Wu wrote:
It is worth noting that you lose the benefits of routing protocols when you
bridge your network
The above is the number one reason against using VLANs for layer 2
transport. A second important issue to consider is management. Every
device from end-to-end where you want
We too have been looking at moving from routed to a switched Mikrotik for
the core network but the unknown quantity seems to be if there are any
latency or speed issues related to the move. A true switched network is
faster than a routed network as the switching is done at a hardware level
but in
Interesting, completely opposite of what is commonly preached
Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Sovereen
Sent: Monday,
Paul Hendry wrote:
We too have been looking at moving from routed to a switched Mikrotik for
the core network but the unknown quantity seems to be if there are any
latency or speed issues related to the move. A true switched network is
faster than a routed network as the switching is done at a
From Techdirt
http://news.techdirt.com/news/wireless/article/6717
Putting A Little Lipstick On Muni WiFi
Back in May, 2004, Municipal Wireless was still just on the drawing
board, but a few towns and cities were about to lead the charge into
using WiFi to meet their admirable goal of providing
Hi Matt,
Actually, our testing and real-world experience shows that convergence is
faster in bridged RSTP network than it is in a routed OSPF network.
We ran OSPF on our wireless network, and still do on our wired network.
With default settings of a hello interval of 10 seconds and a dead router
Gentlemen;
I am in the final stages of design and have begun to guild my WISP. I was wondering what the most effective methods were for marketing?
I was thinking of using the mail, possibly arranging a demo in a parking lot, flyers, and of course adding my company name to the lists on the
The delay in switching a packet at hardware is less than the delay in
routing a packet at software. This is 1 of the reasons that Cisco created
the GSR and why an MPLS switched network is fast than a plain routed
network.
I'm not too interested in convergence times as we only have very minimal
Wow, I can hardly afford to build my WISP and yours will be guilded!!! With a gold plated WISP, why would you need to advertise? :)
Seriously, my WISP, and many others, has experienced steady growth with word of mouth. I have a 4'x6' sign at one tower one a fairly rural road. Other than
Partners Tap LMDS For Powered-Up Wireless Ethernet /search/?query=Ethernet
http://www.telecomweb.com/tnd/17142.html
http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/telecomweb.com/;sz=180x150;ord=021450
Wireless broadband service provider *Nextlink Wireless Inc.*, a
subsidiary of *XO Holdings Inc.*, is teaming
Scott;
I just discovered that the 'B' and the 'G' are real close together ;-)
But seriously, I feel that since we have competition from cable (COX) and DSL (QWEST)I want to get out in front on this thing. For sure though, in every crowd of QWEST/COX customers some of them will be unhappy. We
Sure- but they don't have any plans to make base stations, so none of the
base station manufacturer provided QOS mechanisms will work with zcomax
clients.
-
Jeff
On 6/12/06 7:44 PM, George Rogato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.zcom.com.tw/news001.htm
--
WISPA Wireless List:
Shot in the dark, but if there are any providers out there that can hit
these places, I am a customer for you
Alcova 22495 W US Hwy 220Alcova WY82620
Bairoil503 Antelope DrBairoil WY82322
Beulah 5930 Old Hwy 14Beulah WY82712
Bondurant
I have a Power Point I did for some ISPs about Marketing.
Hit me off-list with your name contact info, if you want it.
Regards,
Peter
RAD-INFO, Inc. - NSP Strategist
We Help ISPs Connect Communicate
813.963.5884
http://4isps.com/newsletter.htm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott;
I
I'd like to piggy-back off of this thread. I'm getting further in the
planning stages for my WISP as well and am trying to come up with ideas
for a pilot program. I want to get a few initial customers who will have
free internet access for a month or two when I first bring the network
online.
Hi Paul,
Regardless of whether you run routed or switched, the speed is about the
same. Unlike a hardware switch that has special processors to handle
traffic at wire speeds, a 10GB/s backplane, etc, Mikrotik runs on
off-the-shelf PC hardware. The processing power needed to get a packet from
Great Topic, this is something I
have been working hard at lately and would be interested in everyones
input as well. Here are some of the ways we have advertised our service.
Yards
signs
This is my favorite. In the areas
that we KNOW qualify for service, Yard Signs is a great way for
Hi Lee,
We've had great success with 18 X 24 yard signs posted
at intersections: http://www.IncomeBuddy.com/ad.php?id=68at=71
I would also suggest making friends with your local real estate
developers so you can post 3' X 6' banners at the entrance to
their subdivisions:
Matt,
Ken and I are planning on it.
Regards,
Dawn DiPietro
Matt Larsen - Lists wrote:
Hi all,
I'm going to WCA in Washington DC later this month. Anyone else going?
Matt Larsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
---
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
Chad,
Thanks for the great email!
I'll change 2 of yours:
Referrals: instead of a credit on the bill... send them a check.. that's
a bigger WOW!
Word of Mouth: have downloadable videos of HOWTO's. With your logo
prominently displayed on shirts, hats, mouse pads, cups, etc. (Product
Chad,
Thanks for the great email!
I'll change 2 of yours:
Referrals: instead of a credit on the bill... send them a check.. that's
a bigger WOW!
I like the idea of sending them a check. Like you say, that has a much
bigger WOW factor. We will have to try that.
Word of Mouth: have
A few corrections:
The issue with 3.650 is the FCC has not
decided on "ANY" spec. Wimax was never a 3.650 "issue"
and this has been corrected time and time again. The FCC has stated publicly
many times that Wimax was never overlooked as a platform. The wifi crowd took
the "contention
Patrick Leary wrote:
Indeed, and the Pew study is very credible, well circulated on the Hill, and
used frequently as source material for other briefings and other reports.
Just because something is widely circulated among influential people
doesn't make it correct.
I do firmly believe
favoring a layer 3 tunneling / handoff method
Care to elaborate on those methods.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Charles Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006
Nah. What Charles misses in his commentary
But all the fancy schmancy technology you implement won't do @#$@ unless
3650 is licensed b/c interference from 20 other systems in the area
(including several from our GPS-synced FM-based FSK friends) eats you for
breakfast, lunch dinner =(
is
Title: Re: [WISPA] Wimax corrections-The info is out there if you look
On the CPE pricing... Yup, and the only one shipping 5.8 product yet is Airspan.
-
Jeff
On 6/13/06 6:42 AM, Brad Larson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A few corrections:
The issue with 3.650 is the FCC has not decided on
Matt,
You brought up an excellent point regarding management gains with MPLS.
In many cases, I'd argue MPLS the preferable choice. But MPLS is not always
a viable choice, that VLAN can deliver viably.
What I mean by that is... There is not yet a complete/stable/tried-and-true
MPLS Open Source
Matt,
Great find on the arcticle. However, I ask, does the press hurt or help
WISPs?
Is it saying, they should have deplyoed Fiber? Or should have left it up to
the professional local WISP, and stuck to governemt stuff? Or They need
better wireless gear than Wifi? Do WISPs win, if the
Anyone compared a routed solution with
a Mikrotik bridged solution for delay/jitter?
Good question. But the problem there is creating a real world test
environment. Convergence, can be tested somewhat accurately in low network
utilization situations. To adequately test Jitter/Delay you
My appologies to the list.
I'd added a couple cents to a thread that had ended weeks ago. Wierd, but
my email client just pulled about 30 emails today on these old threads as if
they were new. I'm reading along ... and this thread looks familiar ... and
only after sending a reply to one of
Might not be you, others commented about the Patricks late emails.
Rich Comroe wrote:
My appologies to the list.
I'd added a couple cents to a thread that had ended weeks ago. Wierd,
but my email client just pulled about 30 emails today on these old
threads as if they were new. I'm
I ogt them too...
Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rich Comroe
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 11:21 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject:
Gino A. Villarini wrote:
I ogt them too...
I peeked at the headers (sorry, that's my schtick) and while the Date:
header said three weeks ago, they were only sent today. I'm guessing
Patrick just has a computer with a really squirrely clock.
David Smith
MVN.net
--
WISPA Wireless List:
It is not a clock issue. All the messages that were sent with old dates
were already delivered previously. These are duplicate messages.
Scriv
David E. Smith wrote:
Gino A. Villarini wrote:
I ogt them too...
I peeked at the headers (sorry, that's my schtick) and while the Date:
John Scrivner wrote:
It is not a clock issue. All the messages that were sent with old dates
were already delivered previously. These are duplicate messages.
Hm. Hmmm
(digs around through mail server logs)
Well, the old posts from three weeks ago and the new posts from today
have
37 matches
Mail list logo
