I recall some past discussion bemoaning the large dish sizes required for
licensed links .. I just found this in the latest Rural Spectrum Scanner
from Bennett Law (http://www.bennetlaw.com/rss.php?vol=13issue=12). Should
WISPA endorse this? I'm not familiar with the details of 11 GHz regulation.
Gary Kim at Fat Pipe makes some interesting predictions about WiMax here
(http://www.fatpipeonline.com/showArticle.php?id=60)
In 2010, the forecasted WiMAX subscriptions in North America will
represent 2 percent of that for mobile 2.5G/3G and 66 percent of the
subscriptions for mobile data
Ericsson Deals Blow to WiMAX
First major telecoms equipment maker to quit WiMAX in favor of 3G mobile
data.
http://www.redherring.com/Article.aspx?a=21764hed=Ericsson+Deals+Blow+to+WiMAX
--
Regards,
Peter Radizeski
RAD-INFO, Inc. - NSP Strategist
We Help ISPs Connect Communicate
Yeah, a nice 4 line in and up to 8 cordless extensions would be nice.
You have a Good Day now,
Carl A Jeptha
http://www.airnet.ca
Office Phone: 905 349-2084
Office Hours: 9:00am - 5:00pm
skype cajeptha
John Valenti wrote:
On March 23, at 1:00 PM March 23, Rich Comroe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think we should support that effort. On the condition that any devices
that it applies to use automatic transmit power control (ATP).
Thoughts?
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Dylan Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2007
Our panasonic system in the office does that. Seems to be the only one that
does though. And trying to find a new handset to replace the one I left on
top of the car has proven to be a bit of an issue
There is clearly a good market for phones like this! I can't believe that
no one is
fyi
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Mark Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 7:17 PM
Subject: [TowerTalk] 350 feet Rohn 55G for sale
I have 350 feet of 55G with working beacon and top plate I need to sell
ASAP. I took down the tower about 5
On 3/24/07, Marlon K. Schafer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we should support that effort. On the condition that any devices
that it applies to use automatic transmit power control (ATP).
Thoughts?
Can you explain why you want to see ATPC in 11 GHz links with 4' dishes?
--
Dylan
Marlon,
What is the frequency of the phone system you speak of? Since this is a
thread on DECT phones and you have never heard of DECT phones I am not sure
your phone system would work to avoid the interference issues of the most
common frequencies used for wireless networks. Some geographic
Dylan,
It would be good to know the minimum required dish size now and the
changes that FiberTower is proposing before deciding what to do or say.
I'm not sure this dish-size issue would impact any WISPs so we may want
to ask ourselves if there are more important issues that we need to be
The statements by Adelstein (*http://tinyurl.com/2jyhdg) *and McDowell (*
http://tinyurl.com/2jg3sx) *make it clear that FiberTower's petition is to
allow 2' dishes. I'm unclear on minimum dish size, having heard 4' from
this list, including a post by Charles Wu. But I just found a 2005 press
Not familiar with 11 GHz, but what speeds and distances are available
with 11 GHz and is the license leasable in different areas?
Dylan Oliver wrote:
The statements by Adelstein (*http://tinyurl.com/2jyhdg) *and McDowell (*
http://tinyurl.com/2jg3sx) *make it clear that FiberTower's petition
It has been understood by most here since WISPA was created that we will
send ads from time to time from our Vendor Members to anyone who
subscribes to WISPA list servers. It is part of the reason why Vendors
join the organization and definitely why they pay us $1000 per year to
be members.
Thank you Jack. You said it better than I could have.
:-)
Scriv
Jack Unger wrote:
Dylan,
It would be good to know the minimum required dish size now and the
changes that FiberTower is proposing before deciding what to do or say.
I'm not sure this dish-size issue would impact any WISPs so
I think that 3' is small enough, 11Ghz fades in the rain pretty good, so I
would think that you would only use 3' dish on links less than 5 Miles. Why
now just run High power 18Ghz radios with 2' then?
Mike Bushard, Jr
Wisper Wireless Solutions, LLC
320-256-WISP (9477)
320-256-9478 Fax
The reason that they put large dish requirements on systems has to do with
frequency reuse.
The fear being that the wider beam will make it more likely to see an
interference issue.
With apc we can run with VERY low fade margins and only raise the power when
the weather gets bad.
Understood
Mine's 2.4. No problems with microwaves or to my wifi lan from it though.
I like the idea of these new phones. I'd love to see something from them
with the 4 line (better yet, 6) capabilities of my panasonic system.
Before we bought the panasonic we tried to create the
Jack,
With all due respect We don't need engineers to know what we'd like the
rules to be like! WISPA is here to serve the interests of the wisp
community. The manufacturers can look after themselves.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Jack Unger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA
It was not just for freq reuse. It was also to encourage the use of higher
freq for short distance links and lower freqs for longer distances.
I personally think that the existing antenna requirements should stay as they
are. Fibertower wants to use 11 ghz for shorter runs and also so they can
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote:
Anyone that was at the meeting yesterday care to comment on this
approach?
I wasn't there, but my understanding from those that were:
Matt Wrote:
It may also be of interest to note that companies such as
ourselves have the
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2007 4:47 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC requests comment on smaller dishes for 11 GHz
It was not just for freq reuse. It was also to encourage the use of
higher freq for
21 matches
Mail list logo
