Mac SE/30 running netBSD 3+ years of service echoing uptime:
:MM:DD:MM:SS every few seconds.
:D I am such a geek!
ryan
On Apr 7, 2008, at 6:12 PM, Travis Johnson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just had to get into a Cisco 3512XL switch that we have installed
> in a
> commercial office building. Wh
Not as impressive but here's my record:
Model CoreBuilder 3500 (rev AA)
System Up Time 2 Years 254 Days 22 Hours 18 Minutes
Travis Johnson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just had to get into a Cisco 3512XL switch that we have installed in a
> commercial office building. While there, I happened to not
Hi,
I just had to get into a Cisco 3512XL switch that we have installed in a
commercial office building. While there, I happened to notice:
Taylors uptime is 4 years, 13 weeks, 2 days, 2 hours, 36 minutes
That's pretty amazing considering it's only on a BackUPS 350 (about 20
minutes of battery
g.729 "should" from a mathematic point of view be able to do everything
g.711 does.
- Original Message -
From: "John Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 1:58 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Femtocells
> G.711 *can* support FAXing, otherwise g.729
Sorry sent this to the promotions committeeoops!
Just wanted everyone to know that Matt and I went to this conference on
Friday that was put out by Jack Unger a couple of weeks ago. It was very
interesting, a bit more academic than the usual conference, but well
worth it.
We met Tim Poza
John, please explain *can* or what is best for faxing?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Thomas
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 12:59 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Femtocells
G.711 *can* support FAXing, otherwise g.729 is
G.711 *can* support FAXing, otherwise g.729 is very common for voice.
John
Mike Hammett wrote:
> I know. AT&T and T-Mobile use GSM (the GSM for wireless is the same as the
> GSM VoIP codec). I dunno if the CDMA operators translate to anything in the
> VoIP world or not.
>
> I've tested with
Paladin 8000 multi die crimper. Used to 5 or 6 sets for it, from DSub
to RJ11/6/45. Some of the dies are off brand that I picked up at a
local flee market. The RJ45 came with it, cost about $60 shipped. I
will only use clam shell from the nose crimpers, every single side
crimper I have used made b
Hi all,
Looking for recommendations for a GOOD set of RJ45 crimpers. Brand and
model would be great.
Thanks!
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
-
I guess I should qualify that a bit. They suck when you are comparing voice
quality.
They are superior when delivering arguably acceptable voice communication
with a minimum of bandwidth.
- Original Message -
From: "Chuck McCown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Mond
Pretty sure G.722 is obsolete and has been rolled into G.726
Most GSM systems use a variant of CELP, ACELP I think. G.729 I think.
All of the CELP methods suck when compared to G.711/22/26 PCM/ADPCM methods.
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Hammett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA Genera
Well right. With transit so cheap these days, I'd look at it more as an
increase in quality than a decrease in expenses.
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: "Tom DeReggi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
I know. AT&T and T-Mobile use GSM (the GSM for wireless is the same as the
GSM VoIP codec). I dunno if the CDMA operators translate to anything in the
VoIP world or not.
I've tested with various codecs and I may use G.729 at some point, but for
now I'm limiting myself to G.711 and G.722 once
Last I heard, some of the cell carriers are using CELP. That works pretty
good but is noticeably worse than the PCM and ADPCM methods.
- Original Message -
From: "Bryan Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 7:58 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Femtoce
G.726 @ 32 kbps should be a lossless ADPCM transcoding of normal PCM G.711.
I have listened to many codec and vocoder tests over the years and I could
never hear the difference between PCM and ADPCM. I think that the 32k
variant conveys all of the same data as uncompressed PCM. Nice thing is
Yes. If you are doing Gigs of traffic, peering make sense. Maybe even with a
few 100mbps, depending on the capacity sold to customers.
But there can also be disadvantages with peering with host sites
1) Flooding. When they don't have a cost to you, they are more likely to
flood you with th
The cell carriers aren't using G711. I haven't seen how much a UMA call
takes up, but I'd bet it's less than the 90K of G.711u. UMA basically
encapsulates a GSM stream inside of an IPSEC tunnel. EDGE traffic gets
up to 100K+ when surfing or downloading files, so I could see a data
stream ove
> A lot of people mention using DSL instead of a T1.
Rule #1- If your business model doesn't work for full price T1s, ($600 per
mon), don't get involved in providing service.
In the long run, You'll go crazy trying to support a WISP on a DSL
connection.
Not from a speed perspective, but from a u
I dunno if I'd use anything less than G.711.
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: "Chuck McCown - 2" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2008 11:08 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Femtocells
19 matches
Mail list logo
