Re: [WISPA] RouterBoard 112

2008-07-02 Thread Blair Davis
Blair Davis wrote: Anyone happen to know the Power Supply voltage for the old RouterBoard 112? Just got some of them and I can't find it on the RouterBoard ste Thanks. Thanks all. So, now I've got them powered up, but the neighbor discovery in winbox doesn't find them. So now

Re: [WISPA] RouterBoard 112

2008-07-02 Thread Jim Patient
There is no default IP. You can use a null modem cable to plug into the serial port. Use Hyperterminal or putty to get into it. set the bit rate to 115200 and you should be able to put an IP on it from the command line. /ip address add address=x.x.x.x/x interface=ether1 If your having

Re: [WISPA] help! replacement MT based 5.8G system connects, but no ping!

2008-07-02 Thread Mark Nash
I've had this problem before when I set the interface on the AP to a certain type. I believe I had to set it to AP Bridge or AP by itself in configuring a point-to-point. Mark Nash UnwiredWest 78 Centennial Loop Suite E Eugene, OR 97401 541-998- 541-998-5599 fax http://www.unwiredwest.com

Re: [WISPA] help! replacement MT based 5.8G system connects, but no ping!

2008-07-02 Thread rabbtux rabbtux
Solved: Help replacement MT ... no ping Many thanks to all who tossed out suggestions! The situation: Had a 5.8G backhaul link with MT-CM9 on one end, and old pebble linux system on the other. Rebooted the pebble system yesterday afternoon and its AP radio was no longer detected, thus creating

Re: [WISPA] Update from the FCC on 3.65Ghz and CBP

2008-07-02 Thread Harold Bledsoe
I respectfully disagree. In my opinion, any frequency that is tied to a particular standard by regulation will do nothing but stifle innovation in that band. -Hal -Original Message- From: John Scrivner [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org To: WISPA General

Re: [WISPA] Update from the FCC on 3.65Ghz and CBP

2008-07-02 Thread John Scrivner
I hope all of you will read this post. I have spent a long time writing it and I think it is very important for us to all think about the issues involved. How about if we tie the 3.65 GHz band to one technology with our wallets instead of making Uncle Sam do it with regulation? We will see which

[WISPA] Spam from ligowave?

2008-07-02 Thread Ryan Langseth
Today i got an email from [EMAIL PROTECTED], i am fairly certain i did not give them my address at any point. I suspect it may have been harvested from the list, has anyone else seen a message from them today? Ryan

Re: [WISPA] Spam from ligowave?

2008-07-02 Thread Harold Bledsoe
We don't harvest from any mailing lists. I will contact you offlist. :) -Original Message- From: Ryan Langseth [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org To: wireless@wispa.org Subject: [WISPA] Spam from ligowave? Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 15:47:46 -0500 Today i got

Re: [WISPA] Spam from ligowave?

2008-07-02 Thread Dennis Burgess
List harvesting = bad ju ju! -- * Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer Link Technologies, Inc -- Mikrotik WISP Support Services* 314-735-0270 http://www.linktechs.net http://www.linktechs.net/ */ Link Technologies, Inc is offering LIVE Mikrotik

Re: [WISPA] Update from the FCC on 3.65Ghz and CBP

2008-07-02 Thread Mike Hammett
$10k for a single AP is why. I can outfit two whole towers with MTI sector antennas for the price of 1 WiMAX radio. Gross throughput. My Mikrotik can do 35 megs of throughput vs. 20 (albeit a larger channel). I want to use WiMAX as it is more spectrally efficient (most important advantage

Re: [WISPA] Spam from ligowave?

2008-07-02 Thread Rogelio
Ryan Langseth wrote: Today i got an email from [EMAIL PROTECTED], i am fairly certain i did not give them my address at any point. I suspect it may have been harvested from the list, has anyone else seen a message from them today? It's nothing an email to spamcop and a call to their ISP

Re: [WISPA] Spam from ligowave?

2008-07-02 Thread Harold Bledsoe
No, really, we didn't harvest anyone's email from any mailing lists. We are very careful to only market to customers of our companies (Deliberant, Ligowave, Wiligear, Wilibox) and have a very simple removal and opt out policy that we honor. I'm sure you all market to your customers in various

Re: [WISPA] Spam from ligowave?

2008-07-02 Thread Matt Liotta
More importantly I don't want to be annoyed by spamcop messages. ;) -Matt On Jul 2, 2008, at 7:05 PM, Harold Bledsoe wrote: No, really, we didn't harvest anyone's email from any mailing lists. We are very careful to only market to customers of our companies (Deliberant, Ligowave,

Re: [WISPA] Update from the FCC on 3.65Ghz and CBP

2008-07-02 Thread Leon D. Zetekoff, NCE
* Harold Bledsoe wrote, On 7/2/2008 3:19 PM: I respectfully disagree. In my opinion, any frequency that is tied to a particular standard by regulation will do nothing but stifle innovation in that band. I agree with Hal. As an amateur radio operator as well as someone in this and the

Re: [WISPA] Update from the FCC on 3.65Ghz and CBP

2008-07-02 Thread Matt Liotta
On Jul 2, 2008, at 7:14 PM, Leon D. Zetekoff, NCE wrote: 3650 is a real PITA because of the grandfathered FSSes. I think, though, we might want to think about moving the full 50 mHz to restricted instead of unrestricted as I don't see unrestricted coming anytime soon. Well there is a place

Re: [WISPA] Update from the FCC on 3.65Ghz and CBP

2008-07-02 Thread reader
I am reminded of a short story I read many years ago. A salesman for farm equipment was out calling on customers in middle America and following his directions found himself turning off the maintained county road into a side road and was immediately confronted with a wide, very deeply rutted,

[WISPA] lease company

2008-07-02 Thread Travis Johnson
Hi, As someone who has done over 50 equipment leases over the last 10 years, I would like to share my experience with one. Business Direct Capital seemed very promising, and had good rates. Even their quote sheet that they made me sign looked good, except it was missing the type of lease ($1

Re: [WISPA] Apology RE: Spam from ligowave?

2008-07-02 Thread Mac Dearman
Thanks for the clarification Ryan Mac -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ryan Langseth Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 5:26 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] Appology RE: Spam from ligowave? My (phone's) email client did

Re: [WISPA] Spam from ligowave?

2008-07-02 Thread Butch Evans
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008, Rogelio wrote: It's nothing an email to spamcop and a call to their ISP cannot fix. :) While this may be true, it is better to first contact the sender at least one time. -- *Butch Evans

Re: [WISPA] Spam from ligowave?

2008-07-02 Thread Butch Evans
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008, Harold Bledsoe wrote: No, really, we didn't harvest anyone's email from any mailing lists. We are very careful to only market to customers of our companies (Deliberant, Ligowave, Wiligear, Wilibox) and have a very simple removal and opt out policy that we honor. The world