Re: [WISPA] MikroTik WDS to non-MT devices

The only time I used WDS between MT and non-MT I could not get it to work until I set the wds-mode to dynamic. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Jerry Richardson wrote: Is there any issue with getting WDS working with non-mikrotik devices - specifically a vivato access point? I have

Re: [WISPA] feedback request

OK, you guys that make your boxes so nice and pretty What do you do when the equipment you put in no longer works and the replacement is much different? I've started with nice enclosures only to have them turn to crap in a couple of years. marlon - Original Message - From: Rick

Re: [WISPA] feedback request

- Original Message - From: Tracy Tippett [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: wireless@wispa.org Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 4:36 PM Subject: [WISPA] feedback request Ladies Gentlemen, I am looking for some feedback. How many POE devices are you typically locating at a single location? I

Re: [WISPA] feedback request

Rick, Nice work. It's not often we see installations posted on any of these discussion lists that are done well enough to be shared IMO. Marlon, Wow, not sure where to even start with you and your comment, so I won't. My guess is you're the type that doesn't make his bed in the morning

Re: [WISPA] feedback request

Or the type that does not use toilet paper ... after all its going to get dirty again? ... jejeje Gino A. Villarini [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

[WISPA] Tranzeo/Mtik disconnect issue...

Does anyone have a Tranzeo or a Mikrotik ticket number I can reference when I open a ticket? Travis? Marlon? http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=7t=24971p=127269 ryan WISPA Wants You! Join today!

Re: [WISPA] feedback request

Something on this list stinks grin Gino Villarini wrote: Or the type that does not use toilet paper ... after all its going to get dirty again? ... jejeje Gino A. Villarini [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145 -Original

Re: [WISPA] feedback request

- Original Message - From: Brad Belton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2008 9:01 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] feedback request Rick, Nice work. It's not often we see installations posted on any of these discussion lists that are

Re: [WISPA] MT interface randomly dumping clients.

Alvarion are at least $50 more per CPE.Canopy I WISH Alvarion was only $50 more per CPE. If it were, It would be all I used, even if it meant $7500 over 150 CPEs. But in my case, for 54mbps modulation CPEs Mikrotik- Ap $350, su $300, ($650 total) Alvarion- Ap $8000, su $1500 ( $9500

Re: [WISPA] MT interface randomly dumping clients.

What is the Canopy 400 series? How does that compare to the Advantage series? Tom DeReggi RapidDSL Wireless, Inc IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 10:20 AM

Re: [WISPA] MT interface randomly dumping clients.

Canopy 400 series is Motorola 5.4GHz (5.8 GHz is coming) OFDM Point to Multipoint Product. Check it out: http://tinyurl.com/6ka7nc Great hardware, and pushes 20Mb with no problems. Viable contender for the WiMAX Market, at a much lower price point. Cheaper than Alvarion too (although more

Re: [WISPA] MT interface randomly dumping clients.

It's pricey but not quite Alvarion bad. Under $3k per AP and $500 CPE. One major difference is that it is OFDM. In terms of speed, if the Advantage is 2X the original Canopy, the 400 series is 3X the original Canopy. Plus, it has GPS sync. What is the Canopy 400 series? How does that

Re: [WISPA] MT interface randomly dumping clients.

I know you were just throwing numbers out there, but my MT CPE are $150 and just the antennas for the APs are $350. -- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com -- From: Tom DeReggi [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

Re: [WISPA] MT interface randomly dumping clients.

I believe it's an Orthogon radio. -- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com -- From: Tom DeReggi [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2008 3:47 PM To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Subject: Re:

[WISPA] Tranzeo 6000 Series Radios

Forgive my Tranzeo ignorance, but I don't work with the radios often (by choice ;-) I have been asked to help setup two point to point links, with a tower in between two buildings to serve as a repeater. The equipment has already been bought, so I am stuck with what I have. Since the

[WISPA] Throughput MT

We have a 5ghz backhaul PTP link with MT 532 on one end and 411 on the other. We have a -57 signal ccq in 100% and a potential throughput listed as 30 Mbps on a solid 54M link. However I can never push more than 20 megs through it.? Anyone else have a simular setup doing better? Were using

Re: [WISPA] Throughput MT

I think you are cpu limited. our setup: 2.4GHz P4 1Gbyte with cm9 card 45ft of lmr-400 between ant and card RB532A with cm9 card 5.18GHz link -68db @ 6Mbps -77db @ 54Mbps link 3200ft Netstream mode, best fit TCP thruput (either direction) 26.4Mbps This is our primary link from our

Re: [WISPA] feedback request

You do nice work Rick. Someone posted on the star forums recently that they plugged their 48 volt war board into a Cisco poe switch and it works. I imagine there is a good chance it works with other 48 volt boards as well. George Rick Harnish wrote: Tracy, Our standard is 6 on small

Re: [WISPA] feedback request

On Thu, 28 Aug 2008, Marlon K. Schafer wrote: OK, you guys that make your boxes so nice and pretty What do you do when the equipment you put in no longer works and the replacement is much different? I've started with nice enclosures only to have them turn to crap in a couple of years.