Correct me if I am wrong here Rick, it will be fruitless to do the map
unless you are able to maintain customer speeds of 4megs down and 1 meg up.
If you service your customer at speeds lower
than that then it does not matter, the FCC will fund the Telcos...
~Doug
---Original
At 11/30/2012 10:17 AM, Rick Harnish wrote:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary==_NextPart_000_031F_01CDCEE3.F0FCA680
Content-Language: en-us
I don't think it is fruitless at all. I'm sure there are a lot of
companies (DSL, Satellite, Mobile and some cable) that are on
Excellent point.
---Original Message---
From: Fred Goldstein
Date: 11/30/2012 9:10:00 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Connect America Fund -- It's Bc!
At 11/30/2012 10:17 AM, Rick Harnish wrote:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
If you aren't on the map, you don't exist to the Feds...not a good situation to
be in, in this regulatory climate.
Jeff
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 30, 2012, at 11:09 AM, Fred Goldstein fgoldst...@ionary.com wrote:
At 11/30/2012 10:17 AM, Rick Harnish wrote:
Content-Type:
approach is used, you could comment that raising it from 768/200 to 4/1 is
excessive, and perhaps say a 1.5/384 standard is more appropriate. Even
Canopy 100 can probably claim that (if it's not loaded), though YMMV.
Are you saying no one is providing service past 1.5/384 with Canopy 100?
I assumed he meant that Canopy 900mHz can not provide speeds above that.
---Original Message---
From: Matt
Date: 11/30/2012 9:46:04 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Connect America Fund -- It's Bc!
approach is used, you could comment that raising
At 11/30/2012 11:45 AM, Matt wrote:
approach is used, you could comment that raising it from 768/200 to 4/1 is
excessive, and perhaps say a 1.5/384 standard is more appropriate. Even
Canopy 100 can probably claim that (if it's not loaded), though YMMV.
Are you saying no one is providing
approach is used, you could comment that raising it from 768/200 to 4/1 is
excessive, and perhaps say a 1.5/384 standard is more appropriate. Even
Canopy 100 can probably claim that (if it's not loaded), though YMMV.
Are you saying no one is providing service past 1.5/384 with Canopy 100?
The rule as it stands now is 3 meg down and 768 up. The 4 meg down and 1 meg
up was something put in the National Broadband Plan by the white house team.
Problem with that is the National Broadband Map (of which was already spec'd
out when they wrote that plan) uses download speed tier breakouts
A WISP could also offer these speeds and raise the price for this plan to
account for the total number of regular speed clients they might lose due to
capacity issues with the higher speed plan. Nowhere do the rules state that
you have to offer those speeds at any given price.
Thank You,
Brian
At 11/30/2012 03:26 PM, Brian Webster wrote:
The rule as it stands now is 3 meg down and 768 up. The 4 meg down and 1 meg
up was something put in the National Broadband Plan by the white house team.
Problem with that is the National Broadband Map (of which was already spec'd
out when they wrote
11 matches
Mail list logo
