I disagree. I weighed the performance specs and price and I feel I will
save money with this platform. If you are saying it is more expensive
than other platforms then you are right but the performance boost and
wider coverage per cell make up for much of the higher cost.. I disagree
that "main
Forrest W Christian wrote:
George wrote:
And I should also say that it is being discussed and addressed by on
the wispa fcc committee list.
I'm working on the first draft of a response from WISPA..
Basically saying that this is a BAD idea, at least in those bands shared
with ISM/UNII users.
One point to bring up is the fact that they request the band and
privileges to do research and to further understanding and techniques
yet they want an exemption from something which they say is quite
difficult. I would say that is what research is all about and they
would want to solve that probl
No, they only work with trango ap’s
Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143
fax 787.273.4145
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of rabbtux rabbtux
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 6:44
PM
To: WISPA
George wrote:
And I should also say that it is being discussed and addressed by on
the wispa fcc committee list.
I'm working on the first draft of a response from WISPA..
Basically saying that this is a BAD idea, at least in those bands shared
with ISM/UNII users.
-forrest
--
WISPA Wireless
Thanks George. I could not find any information on this.
George wrote:
Here is what I got from P15:
On March 13, 2006, The ARRL has proposed a change in regulating spread
spectrum power output. This will dramatically affect users of
802.11b/g in
the 2.4 GHz frequency range.
Basically the
And I should also say that it is being discussed and addressed by on the
wispa fcc committee list.
George
George wrote:
Here is what I got from P15:
On March 13, 2006, The ARRL has proposed a change in regulating spread
spectrum power output. This will dramatically affect users of 802.11b/g
Here is what I got from P15:
On March 13, 2006, The ARRL has proposed a change in regulating spread
spectrum power output. This will dramatically affect users of 802.11b/g in
the 2.4 GHz frequency range.
Basically the proposal allows amateur radio operators to run powers of 100
watts without a
Sure, take the time to put all your towers. ;) I just did the NOC.
One of these days I'll slap another ten plus sites on there.
Blair Davis wrote:
Now take a look at the one on the southwest corner of Michigan..
Brian Rohrbacher wrote:
Now that was easy.
Go check out that cool WISP
Marlon,
Can you dig up any information on this?
Regards,
Dawn DiPietro
Eric Rogers wrote:
Guys,
I received a random e-mail from someone that I don't even know. I thought was
a phony e-mail (I will append the text below). I am not one that tries to
spread rumors or anything, but I went t
Guys,
I received a random e-mail from someone that I don't even know. I thought was
a phony e-mail (I will append the text below). I am not one that tries to
spread rumors or anything, but I went to the ARRL site, and with a quick search
on 2.4, I found this article: http://www.arrl.org/hsm
11 matches
Mail list logo
