[WISPA] FCC requests comment on smaller dishes for 11 GHz

2007-03-23 Thread Dylan Oliver

I recall some past discussion bemoaning the large dish sizes required for
licensed links .. I just found this in the latest "Rural Spectrum Scanner"
from Bennett Law (http://www.bennetlaw.com/rss.php?vol=13&issue=12). Should
WISPA endorse this? I'm not familiar with the details of 11 GHz regulation.

*FCC Seeks Comment on the Use of Smaller Antennas in the 11 GHz Band*

The FCC has released a *Public Notice* announcing that it has adopted a *Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking* seeking comment on whether to permit the
installation of smaller antennas by Fixed Service (FS) operators in the
10.7-11.7 GHz band.  The FCC initiated the rulemaking pursuant to a Petition
for Rulemaking filed by FiberTower, Inc., a wireless backhaul provider,
proposing to change the technical parameters that would permit the use of
smaller FS antennas with reduced mainbeam gain, increased beamwidth, and
modified sidelobe suppression in the 11 GHz band.  The FCC seeks comment on
whether FiberTower, Inc.'s proposals would serve the public interest by
facilitating the efficient use of the 11 GHz band while protecting other
users in the band from interference due to the use of smaller antennas.  The
pleading cycle has not yet been established.

Best,
--
Dylan Oliver
Primaverity, LLC
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Vonage

2007-03-23 Thread Rich Comroe
Outstanding find!  I checked out the summary you posted on your site.  Equipped 
with patent numbers I know how to access them from uspto well enough ... and 
they're free (have almost 40 issued under my name).  I can fully understand how 
a company can independently develop and use an algorithm that another company 
has patented (the finding that the infringement was not "willful").  However, 
I've been in the industry long enough to know that "you got'ta check" before 
you ship a product if you intend to compete with big fish that take IPR 
seriously.  Only a newbie (completely unfamiliar with the concept of IPR) could 
make such an eggregious error (which should indicate as well as anything that 
Vonage is, in fact, newbie).

Never used pacer.  Looked it up (http://pacer.psc.uscourts.gov/) and it looks 
interesting.

I'd love to read the verdict just for interests sake.  Do you need a separate 
email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] as your post reads?

Rich
  - Original Message - 
  From: Peter R. 
  To: WISPA General List 
  Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 9:48 PM
  Subject: Re: [WISPA] Vonage


  I tracked down the patents and the verdict. I had to dig through PACER 
  and pay about $4 to get it (you pay for every page that you query on 
  PACER. To register you have to give a valid credit card).

  Details here:  
  http://radinfo.blogspot.com/2007/03/case-106-cv-00682-cmh-brp.html

  If you want a copy of the verdict, email me your name and contact info 
  and I'll send you the 28 pages of techno-babble as opined by U.S. 
  District Court Judge Claude Hilton.

  Regards,

  Peter Radizeski
  RAD-INFO, Inc.  <- see Info is in the name :)


  Rich Comroe wrote:

  >I didn't find anything that listed the patents in question.  Most were only 
business articles, but one article did "summarized" the patent topics.
  >
  
>http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/business/20060619-1055-vonage-verizonsuit.html
  >
  >"Verizon charged that Vonage is infringing on at least seven of its patents 
regarding Internet phone service, a technology known as voice over Internet 
protocol, or VoIP. The patents include inventions related to gateway interfaces 
between a packet-switched and circuit-switched network, billing and fraud 
detection, call services such as call forwarding and voicemail and methods 
related to Wi-Fi handset use in a VoIP network, the lawsuit said."
  >
  >BTW - cursory search at http://www.uspto.gov/ lists Verizon as receiving 
"57" issued patents in total since 2001.  It's not a huge number if you were 
inclined to search to see what they got granted that matched the topics listed 
in the article above.  All issued patents are public record and can be 
downloaded from uspto.  The trick is narrowing down the list (or finding the 
issued numbers for the patents in question).  Does anyone know where to find 
the court actions?  That would surely list the patent numbers at issue.
  >
  >Rich
  >
  >  - Original Message - 
  >  From: George Rogato 
  >  To: WISPA General List 
  >  Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 5:50 PM
  >  Subject: [WISPA] Vonage
  >
  >
  >  What patents did Vonage infringe upon.
  >  What does Verizon have a patter on concerning voip and how does that 
  >  effect the future?
  >
  >  -- 
  >
  -- 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] Test

2007-03-23 Thread Charles Wu
1...2...3...
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Vonage

2007-03-23 Thread Peter R.
I tracked down the patents and the verdict. I had to dig through PACER 
and pay about $4 to get it (you pay for every page that you query on 
PACER. To register you have to give a valid credit card).


Details here:  
http://radinfo.blogspot.com/2007/03/case-106-cv-00682-cmh-brp.html


If you want a copy of the verdict, email me your name and contact info 
and I'll send you the 28 pages of techno-babble as opined by U.S. 
District Court Judge Claude Hilton.


Regards,

Peter Radizeski
RAD-INFO, Inc.  <- see Info is in the name :)


Rich Comroe wrote:


I didn't find anything that listed the patents in question.  Most were only business 
articles, but one article did "summarized" the patent topics.

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/business/20060619-1055-vonage-verizonsuit.html

"Verizon charged that Vonage is infringing on at least seven of its patents 
regarding Internet phone service, a technology known as voice over Internet protocol, or 
VoIP. The patents include inventions related to gateway interfaces between a 
packet-switched and circuit-switched network, billing and fraud detection, call services 
such as call forwarding and voicemail and methods related to Wi-Fi handset use in a VoIP 
network, the lawsuit said."

BTW - cursory search at http://www.uspto.gov/ lists Verizon as receiving "57" 
issued patents in total since 2001.  It's not a huge number if you were inclined to 
search to see what they got granted that matched the topics listed in the article above.  
All issued patents are public record and can be downloaded from uspto.  The trick is 
narrowing down the list (or finding the issued numbers for the patents in question).  
Does anyone know where to find the court actions?  That would surely list the patent 
numbers at issue.

Rich

 - Original Message - 
 From: George Rogato 
 To: WISPA General List 
 Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 5:50 PM

 Subject: [WISPA] Vonage


 What patents did Vonage infringe upon.
 What does Verizon have a patter on concerning voip and how does that 
 effect the future?


 -- 


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Vonage

2007-03-23 Thread Rich Comroe
I didn't find anything that listed the patents in question.  Most were only 
business articles, but one article did "summarized" the patent topics.

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/business/20060619-1055-vonage-verizonsuit.html

"Verizon charged that Vonage is infringing on at least seven of its patents 
regarding Internet phone service, a technology known as voice over Internet 
protocol, or VoIP. The patents include inventions related to gateway interfaces 
between a packet-switched and circuit-switched network, billing and fraud 
detection, call services such as call forwarding and voicemail and methods 
related to Wi-Fi handset use in a VoIP network, the lawsuit said."

BTW - cursory search at http://www.uspto.gov/ lists Verizon as receiving "57" 
issued patents in total since 2001.  It's not a huge number if you were 
inclined to search to see what they got granted that matched the topics listed 
in the article above.  All issued patents are public record and can be 
downloaded from uspto.  The trick is narrowing down the list (or finding the 
issued numbers for the patents in question).  Does anyone know where to find 
the court actions?  That would surely list the patent numbers at issue.

Rich

  - Original Message - 
  From: George Rogato 
  To: WISPA General List 
  Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 5:50 PM
  Subject: [WISPA] Vonage


  What patents did Vonage infringe upon.
  What does Verizon have a patter on concerning voip and how does that 
  effect the future?

  -- 
  WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

  Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

  Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] New Alvarion CPE- Excellent

2007-03-23 Thread Tom DeReggi
Regradless, I'm very excited about these units. But I admit, my post was 
based on Visual Lab Evaluation, not proven field deployment over time, as I 
just received the units. What will matter most, is real world trials. If it 
looses 2-3db, that would be disappointing.  I do not have the history to 
compare Alvarion against their own older models, and can only compare them 
to multiple other manufacturer units, that we've used over time.  I look 
forward to your feedback, and plan to share mine, as we get them installed.


Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: "Marty Dougherty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: "WISPA General List" 
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 1:48 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] New Alvarion CPE- Excellent


You never had an older unit..smaller. More appealing does not always mean 
much..the units have 2 or 3 db less received signal the revC and the weather 
seal is questionable..we have installed 12 of them this week so I will 
reserve my option for a bit on the new radios..marty


-Original Message-
From: "Tom DeReggi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List" 
Sent: 3/23/07 1:44 PM
Subject: [WISPA] New Alvarion CPE- Excellent

I just received my first order of  the new Alvarion, Horiz or Vert Polarity
mountable, CPE.
I have to say, SWET!!

The units come with a Solid heavy Duty Mounting Design. I believe it will
mount on anything from 1-1/4" to 5" pipes. Comes with thick all-thread, less
likely to strip. Teethed Mounting Angles are part of the Case to prevent
rotation slip.  Still solid metal backing for optimal Heat-disapation and
F/B ratio shielding. Its foot print is also significantly smaller now.  Also
probably one of the most cosmetically pleasing designs I have ever seen.  It
just has quality written all over it.  I really like the new CAT5
Feed-through Joint.  Its a molder rubber plug that slips in and clips into
place securely. When you pull the Plug out, it can open up to feed a
pre-terminated cable through, and then closes back around it. Its molded
around the Cat5 Jack, so the rubber is what holds the CAT5 in place, when
you slide it in place.  Whoever came up with this design is Brilliant.
Installation times and Customer Approval times, are going to be Lightning
QUICK, with this CPE!  Its just a plain predictable time-saver.

It does not offer the flexibilty of Optional add-on Mutli-Card radios or
External ports in the one unit, but its not intended to.  Its a fantastic
all-in-one unit for needs up to 21db antenna gain, where you just take it
out of the box and get rolling.  This unit is my nominee for Best CPE Design
of the Year, and will be a hard act to follow. (From a Physical perspective,
not meaning to spawn Technology Software Debates, which were argued to death
last month)

Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] Vonage

2007-03-23 Thread George Rogato

What patents did Vonage infringe upon.
What does Verizon have a patter on concerning voip and how does that 
effect the future?


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] New Principal Member - MetaLINK Technologies, Inc.

2007-03-23 Thread John Scrivner
Here is one fast growing WISP operator! Eric Merkel from MetaLINK 
Technologies, Inc. has joined up as WISPA's newest Principal Member.  I 
am so happy to see such a broad range of WISPs becoming part of WISPA. 
We have many operators of various sizes joining now every week and our 
combined customer bases will soon be able to show regulators, investors, 
legislators, etc. that WISPs are a much more important part of the 
entire broadband industry than many would have believed. I want to 
personally thank Eric and all from MetaLINK Technolgies for making the 
decision to support WISPA and look forward to working with you to 
promote and improve the WISP industry. Here is a little background on 
Eric and MetaLINK:


MetaLINK Technologies, Inc. was founded in 1996 as a dial-up ISP in 
Northwest Ohio by myself (Eric Merkel), Todd Harpest and Julie Latham. 
Over the past 11 years, MetaLINK has expanded its service offerings to 
include Web Hosting, DSL, Network Consulting and Administration, 
CLEC/Dial-up Wholesaling and of course Broadband Fixed Wireless in 2002.


MetaLINK's wireless coverage area 
(http://wireless.metalink.net/ml_coverage.jpg) is mainly in Northwest 
Ohio but we also reach into Northeastern Indiana and Southeastern 
Michigan. We serve both residential and business customers using a 
variety of unlicensed frequencies (900Mhz, 2.4GHz, 5.8Ghz). To date we 
have over 2500 wireless subscribers and are adding over a 100 new 
accounts per month.
MetaLINK is excited to now be a part of WISPA. WISPA's lobbying and 
other efforts are finally giving the small WISP's voice in Washington. 
We look forward to working with everyone and shaping the future of the 
Broadband Wireless Industry!

Sincerely,

Eric Merkel, President

MetaLINK Technologies, Inc.

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Postini Mail Scanning Service

2007-03-23 Thread Frank Muto

Mark,
As a WISPA sponsoring vendor for Postini, I can offer some information as I 
was a Postini customer before I was asked to become a Postini Partner 
Reseller. Postini uses an MX directed service that redirects your customer's 
messages through the Postini hosted filtering data centers. Accounts can be 
manually created or use one of two automated user creation methods. There 
are no software or hardware concerns and the interface is 100% web based for 
all your system administration.




Since closing down our dialup data center in 2002, we moved all our 
webhosting to our secondary provider we have used from our beginning and 
needed stronger filtering methods. Since we were too far away to administer 
an appliance type service, e.g. Barracuda, Ironport, etc., we gave Postini a 
try. Our main concern was reducing our server loads and increased disc space 
for handling the increasing amount of spam and viruses.




Postini handled this by being at the front edge of the network and killing 
off a significant amount of wasted bandwidth created by spam/viruses, a 
definite plus. Since we did both virtual and dedicated hosting, our 
virtually hosted accounts that had high amounts of spam traffic, we saw 
increased server performance and significant amount of reduced disc space as 
well as reduced bandwidth overall.




The cost of using Postini was genuinely a concern, but so was the potential 
cost of losing revenue from customers wanting a better filtering service and 
costs of increased bandwidth and server resources. We took advantage of 
Postini's 30 day trial and gave all our clients the same. We put all of our 
customer domains on the service and in using Postini's reporting, were able 
to see our largest email contributors and provide those stats to our 
customers on a before and after period of using Postini. This provided a 
good development tool in determining our costs to our customers and how we 
could offer the service to them and at what price.




That said, we also began reaching outside of our own hosted customers and 
promoted Postini to other businesses, especially those hosting their own 
mail servers, e.g., MS Exchange. We again offered free trials and developed 
a significant amount of additional business by promoting Postini and 
leveraging their existing marketing and press credentials. By Postini being 
a hosted service, (Software as a Service - SaaS) we were also able to 
provide businesses with multiple offices a centralized management control of 
their email system messages.




We have customers with as little as five accounts and some with over a 
thousand users and I can honestly say our churn is hardly measurable in 
almost 4 years of providing Postini, because they did not like or afford the 
service. One of the best features I feel Postini offers is a wireless 
feature for filtering to PDA's, e.g. Blackberry and Treo's. We actually have 
a few IT specialty companies promoting this feature alone and doing a very 
good job at that.




As for the impact, all I can say is that in all my time providing Internet 
related services, I have never had an easier time than that in offering 
Postini. In fact, I have completely focused my company's direction on 
providing Postini exclusively and hopefully adding other related email 
services in the future.




In closing, no matter what service you use for spam/virus control, your 
customers need it and want it.








Best Regards,
Frank Muto
President
FSM Marketing Group, Inc.
Postini Partner Reseller
http://wispa.spam-virus.com

Toll Free: 800-246-7740
Cell: 630-258-7422
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

































- Original Message - 
From: "Mark Nash" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>




For those of you using this service, please tell me about it.

1. How accounts are set up to send through their system.
2. What you like about it.
3. What you don't like about it.
4. How do you pay for it?  (increase subscriber costs, eat it, etc)
5. Has it had a positive impact on your customers (if you can tell)?

Mark Nash
Network Engineer
UnwiredOnline.Net
350 Holly Street
Junction City, OR 97448
http://www.uwol.net
541-998-
541-998-5599 fax


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Postini Mail Scanning Service

2007-03-23 Thread Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181

We love it!

1:  Two ways.  Enter each addy by hand.  Or there's an autocreate in which a 
user just has to get 3 emails in 24 hours and the account is automatically 
set up.  We usually set up our hosted customers this way as it saves 
everyone time.  They just create a new email account then send it a few test 
messages and poof, postini is up and running.


2: VERY low personel overhead.  And it's always as current as anyone's gonna 
get.  It's a "professional" third patry contractor for us, makes it easier 
to upsell.  Also very few false positives.


3:  GUI isn't at all intuitive when setting up new domains etc.  Has spurts 
of heavy misses.


4:  Optional service.  We charge $1 per email account for spam/virus 
filtering.  Just over 100% margin for this service.


5:  I'll bet we've had less than 5 people decide it wasn't worth it.  Ever. 
We have hundreds of email accounts using it now.


The best part is that *I* don't need local tallent or contractors to admin 
yet another box or another service on an existing box.  It's also stopping 
traffic BEFORE it gets to my network.  We have lower bw needs due to 
postini.  I've had customers trim 10 to 15 GIGS per month just by adding 
postini.  The amount of html content is shocking in all of that spam crap.


laters,
Marlon
(509) 982-2181
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq)WISP Operator since 1999!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam



- Original Message - 
From: "Mark Nash" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: "WISPA General List" 
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 11:01 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Postini Mail Scanning Service


For those of you using this service, please tell me about it.

1. How accounts are set up to send through their system.
2. What you like about it.
3. What you don't like about it.
4. How do you pay for it?  (increase subscriber costs, eat it, etc)
5. Has it had a positive impact on your customers (if you can tell)?

Mark Nash
Network Engineer
UnwiredOnline.Net
350 Holly Street
Junction City, OR 97448
http://www.uwol.net
541-998-
541-998-5599 fax
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] New Alvarion CPE- Excellent

2007-03-23 Thread Brad Belton
Hello Tom,

Got any pictures?

Good to hear they improved the mounting design.  The old design was too
small for many of the pipes we use.  If the new design will accommodate 3
1/2" - 4" pipes then that is a nice improvement.

Wow, they changed the CAT5 weather seal and now a terminated CAT5 cable will
pass through!?!  I wonder if they are also now adhering to 568A & 568B
standards too?  (friendly jab in the side)  

Seems to me I remember Patrick attempting to belittle me after I shed a
little light on this design flaw.  Patrick's statement not long ago:

"The gaul of us to create a tight seal. I am sorry you are not able to
figure out how to attach the connector Brad. Thousands of others seem to
manage just fine and when is the last time you ever heard of anyone
complaining about water intrusion into a VL VPE or PoE line?"

H...So, do I get an apology now Patrick?  Looks like your own design
team has rethought the CAT5 weather seal.   

It is good to see Alvarion is listening to the end user even if they don't
admit it.  Maybe dual band and dual polarity is just around the corner.
They had better hurry up with it before Trango releases their OFDM product
with DB and DP.

Best,


Brad




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 1:44 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] New Alvarion CPE- Excellent

I just received my first order of  the new Alvarion, Horiz or Vert Polarity 
mountable, CPE.
I have to say, SWET!!

The units come with a Solid heavy Duty Mounting Design. I believe it will 
mount on anything from 1-1/4" to 5" pipes. Comes with thick all-thread, less

likely to strip. Teethed Mounting Angles are part of the Case to prevent 
rotation slip.  Still solid metal backing for optimal Heat-disapation and 
F/B ratio shielding. Its foot print is also significantly smaller now.  Also

probably one of the most cosmetically pleasing designs I have ever seen.  It

just has quality written all over it.  I really like the new CAT5 
Feed-through Joint.  Its a molder rubber plug that slips in and clips into 
place securely. When you pull the Plug out, it can open up to feed a 
pre-terminated cable through, and then closes back around it. Its molded 
around the Cat5 Jack, so the rubber is what holds the CAT5 in place, when 
you slide it in place.  Whoever came up with this design is Brilliant. 
Installation times and Customer Approval times, are going to be Lightning 
QUICK, with this CPE!  Its just a plain predictable time-saver.

It does not offer the flexibilty of Optional add-on Mutli-Card radios or 
External ports in the one unit, but its not intended to.  Its a fantastic 
all-in-one unit for needs up to 21db antenna gain, where you just take it 
out of the box and get rolling.  This unit is my nominee for Best CPE Design

of the Year, and will be a hard act to follow. (From a Physical perspective,

not meaning to spawn Technology Software Debates, which were argued to death

last month)

Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Wireless Broadband to remain unregulated

2007-03-23 Thread Tom DeReggi
Not necessarilly.  The Announcements were on topics relating to Wireless 
Internet "Carriers".


Saying Telco Wireless Cell Phone Carriers would not have to follow Telco 
Rules, so they could better compete against other ISPs, such as small WISPs 
and Cable Companies.


Remember Support for "Wireless" now means support for the Biggest Wireless 
License Holders in the country, Verizon, AT&T, Sprint.



Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - 
From: "John Scrivner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: 
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 3:09 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Wireless Broadband to remain unregulated



Depending on your perspective of what "unregulated" means, here is a
quote from IPTelephony.org regarding a vote at the FCC which I would
assume is good news for us. At least it could mean we will not get any
more new regulation for a while:

Despite a split in opinion over net neutrality regulations, the body 
unanimously voted to keep wireless broadband unregulatd, which means the 
providers will be exempt from economic regulations, filing rates with the 
FCC, providing wholesale network access to competitors, and contributing 
to the USF.











--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] New Alvarion CPE- Excellent

2007-03-23 Thread Marty Dougherty
You never had an older unit..smaller. More appealing does not always mean 
much..the units have 2 or 3 db less received signal the revC and the weather 
seal is questionable..we have installed 12 of them this week so I will reserve 
my option for a bit on the new radios..marty

-Original Message-
From: "Tom DeReggi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List" 
Sent: 3/23/07 1:44 PM
Subject: [WISPA] New Alvarion CPE- Excellent

I just received my first order of  the new Alvarion, Horiz or Vert Polarity 
mountable, CPE.
I have to say, SWET!!

The units come with a Solid heavy Duty Mounting Design. I believe it will 
mount on anything from 1-1/4" to 5" pipes. Comes with thick all-thread, less 
likely to strip. Teethed Mounting Angles are part of the Case to prevent 
rotation slip.  Still solid metal backing for optimal Heat-disapation and 
F/B ratio shielding. Its foot print is also significantly smaller now.  Also 
probably one of the most cosmetically pleasing designs I have ever seen.  It 
just has quality written all over it.  I really like the new CAT5 
Feed-through Joint.  Its a molder rubber plug that slips in and clips into 
place securely. When you pull the Plug out, it can open up to feed a 
pre-terminated cable through, and then closes back around it. Its molded 
around the Cat5 Jack, so the rubber is what holds the CAT5 in place, when 
you slide it in place.  Whoever came up with this design is Brilliant. 
Installation times and Customer Approval times, are going to be Lightning 
QUICK, with this CPE!  Its just a plain predictable time-saver.

It does not offer the flexibilty of Optional add-on Mutli-Card radios or 
External ports in the one unit, but its not intended to.  Its a fantastic 
all-in-one unit for needs up to 21db antenna gain, where you just take it 
out of the box and get rolling.  This unit is my nominee for Best CPE Design 
of the Year, and will be a hard act to follow. (From a Physical perspective, 
not meaning to spawn Technology Software Debates, which were argued to death 
last month)

Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] New Alvarion CPE- Excellent

2007-03-23 Thread Tom DeReggi
I just received my first order of  the new Alvarion, Horiz or Vert Polarity 
mountable, CPE.

I have to say, SWET!!

The units come with a Solid heavy Duty Mounting Design. I believe it will 
mount on anything from 1-1/4" to 5" pipes. Comes with thick all-thread, less 
likely to strip. Teethed Mounting Angles are part of the Case to prevent 
rotation slip.  Still solid metal backing for optimal Heat-disapation and 
F/B ratio shielding. Its foot print is also significantly smaller now.  Also 
probably one of the most cosmetically pleasing designs I have ever seen.  It 
just has quality written all over it.  I really like the new CAT5 
Feed-through Joint.  Its a molder rubber plug that slips in and clips into 
place securely. When you pull the Plug out, it can open up to feed a 
pre-terminated cable through, and then closes back around it. Its molded 
around the Cat5 Jack, so the rubber is what holds the CAT5 in place, when 
you slide it in place.  Whoever came up with this design is Brilliant. 
Installation times and Customer Approval times, are going to be Lightning 
QUICK, with this CPE!  Its just a plain predictable time-saver.


It does not offer the flexibilty of Optional add-on Mutli-Card radios or 
External ports in the one unit, but its not intended to.  Its a fantastic 
all-in-one unit for needs up to 21db antenna gain, where you just take it 
out of the box and get rolling.  This unit is my nominee for Best CPE Design 
of the Year, and will be a hard act to follow. (From a Physical perspective, 
not meaning to spawn Technology Software Debates, which were argued to death 
last month)


Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] Using DECT phones to avoid interference issues.

2007-03-23 Thread John Valenti
On March 23, at 1:00 PM March 23, "Rich Comroe"  
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


There's a reason you haven't seen these products here.  I began  
searching for why the last time a thread discussed the 1.9GHz UL  
band surfaced on this list.  I doubt you'll ever see much product  
ever emerge for this band in the United States.  There's a reason  
for this too ...




DECT phones are definitely here in the US. I bought one at CompUSA  
last fall, and I'm sure I've seen then at Staples / Office Max / Best  
Buy.


Maybe the manufacturers have started offering them, now that the per  
phone cost is reduced.


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] CALEA

2007-03-23 Thread Peter R.

What meeting?

Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote:

Anyone that was at the meeting yesterday care to comment on this 
approach?


thanks,
Marlon
(509) 982-2181   (408) 907-6910 
(Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq)WISP Operator since 
1999!

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam



- Original Message - From: "Matt Liotta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "WISPA General List" 
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 7:10 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] CALEA


It may also be of interest to note that companies such as ourselves 
have the ability to provide lawful intercept in compliance with CALEA 
for our single-homed downstream ISP customers assuming there is no 
NAT involved.


-Matt


Peter R. wrote:


ISP-Planet has a blurb on CALEA:

WISPs take note: Baller law group's Key Legal and Technical 
Requirements and
Options for CALEA 
(http://www.baller.com/pdfs/BHLG-CTC_CALEA_Memo.pdf). This

is especially important if you don't know about the March 12 and May 14
deadlines. Kris Twomey can help you too (www.lokt.net). 
OpenCALEA.org is

interesting but we don't know much about it yet.

Thank you.

Regards,

Peter Radizeski
RAD-INFO, Inc. - NSP Strategist
We Help ISPs Connect & Communicate
813.963.5884  efax 530-323-7025
http://4isps.com



--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] Postini Mail Scanning Service

2007-03-23 Thread Mark Nash
For those of you using this service, please tell me about it.

1. How accounts are set up to send through their system.
2. What you like about it.
3. What you don't like about it.
4. How do you pay for it?  (increase subscriber costs, eat it, etc)
5. Has it had a positive impact on your customers (if you can tell)?

Mark Nash
Network Engineer
UnwiredOnline.Net
350 Holly Street
Junction City, OR 97448
http://www.uwol.net
541-998-
541-998-5599 fax
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] CALEA

2007-03-23 Thread Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181

Anyone that was at the meeting yesterday care to comment on this approach?

thanks,
Marlon
(509) 982-2181   
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services

42846865 (icq)WISP Operator since 1999!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam



- Original Message - 
From: "Matt Liotta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "WISPA General List" 
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 7:10 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] CALEA


It may also be of interest to note that companies such as ourselves have 
the ability to provide lawful intercept in compliance with CALEA for our 
single-homed downstream ISP customers assuming there is no NAT involved.


-Matt


Peter R. wrote:

ISP-Planet has a blurb on CALEA:

WISPs take note: Baller law group's Key Legal and Technical 
Requirements and
Options for CALEA 
(http://www.baller.com/pdfs/BHLG-CTC_CALEA_Memo.pdf). This

is especially important if you don't know about the March 12 and May 14
deadlines. Kris Twomey can help you too (www.lokt.net). OpenCALEA.org is
interesting but we don't know much about it yet.

Thank you.

Regards,

Peter Radizeski
RAD-INFO, Inc. - NSP Strategist
We Help ISPs Connect & Communicate
813.963.5884  efax 530-323-7025
http://4isps.com







--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] DMCA takedown battle

2007-03-23 Thread Peter R.

An interesting little story about the DMCA, the NFL and a lawyer.

http://tinyurl.com/22cp6l
or
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070320-nfl-fumbles-dmca-takedown-battle-could-face-sanctions.html



--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] Anyone service Reno Nevada

2007-03-23 Thread George Rogato

I have a resi sub moving to:

8310 opal ranch way
reno 89506

They are looking for a wisp that I recommend.
--
George Rogato

Welcome to WISPA

www.wispa.org

http://signup.wispa.org/
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] (no subject)

2007-03-23 Thread Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181

That seems reasonable.

Marlon
(509) 982-2181
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq)WISP Operator since 1999!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam



- Original Message - 
From: "Justin S. Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: 
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 6:44 AM
Subject: [WISPA] (no subject)



http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271695A1.doc





Key part of the document:

Specifically, the Ruling finds that the transmission component underlying
wireless broadband Internet access service is "telecommunications," and 
that
the provision of this telecommunications transmission component as part of 
a

functionally integrated wireless Internet access service is an information
service.  This approach is consistent with the framework that the 
Commission
already has established for cable modem service, wireline broadband 
Internet
access service, and BPL-enabled Internet access service, thus furthering 
the

goal of regulating like services in a similar manner.  The FCC also found
that wireless broadband Internet access service using mobile technologies 
is

not a "commercial mobile service," as that term is defined in the Act and
implemented in the FCC's rules





Justin







--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] CALEA

2007-03-23 Thread Matt Liotta
It may also be of interest to note that companies such as ourselves have 
the ability to provide lawful intercept in compliance with CALEA for our 
single-homed downstream ISP customers assuming there is no NAT involved.


-Matt


Peter R. wrote:

ISP-Planet has a blurb on CALEA:

WISPs take note: Baller law group's Key Legal and Technical 
Requirements and
Options for CALEA 
(http://www.baller.com/pdfs/BHLG-CTC_CALEA_Memo.pdf). This

is especially important if you don't know about the March 12 and May 14
deadlines. Kris Twomey can help you too (www.lokt.net). OpenCALEA.org is
interesting but we don't know much about it yet.

Thank you.

Regards,

Peter Radizeski
RAD-INFO, Inc. - NSP Strategist
We Help ISPs Connect & Communicate
813.963.5884  efax 530-323-7025
http://4isps.com







--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] CALEA

2007-03-23 Thread Peter R.

ISP-Planet has a blurb on CALEA:

WISPs take note: Baller law group's Key Legal and Technical Requirements and
Options for CALEA (http://www.baller.com/pdfs/BHLG-CTC_CALEA_Memo.pdf). This
is especially important if you don't know about the March 12 and May 14
deadlines. Kris Twomey can help you too (www.lokt.net). OpenCALEA.org is
interesting but we don't know much about it yet.

Thank you.

Regards,

Peter Radizeski
RAD-INFO, Inc. - NSP Strategist
We Help ISPs Connect & Communicate
813.963.5884  efax 530-323-7025
http://4isps.com





--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] (no subject)

2007-03-23 Thread Justin S. Wilson
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-271695A1.doc

 

 

Key part of the document:

Specifically, the Ruling finds that the transmission component underlying
wireless broadband Internet access service is "telecommunications," and that
the provision of this telecommunications transmission component as part of a
functionally integrated wireless Internet access service is an information
service.  This approach is consistent with the framework that the Commission
already has established for cable modem service, wireline broadband Internet
access service, and BPL-enabled Internet access service, thus furthering the
goal of regulating like services in a similar manner.  The FCC also found
that wireless broadband Internet access service using mobile technologies is
not a "commercial mobile service," as that term is defined in the Act and
implemented in the FCC's rules

 

 

Justin

 

 

 

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/