I agree with the netflow data, it's easy on the router, no super huge
database required, and here is a link to a demo for a product I've used
before that may just fit the bill for you, I have used the free edition
(monitors two interfaces)for some time now for a customers dedicated line
and it
Just use MT! Mikrotik and OSPF. Forget about these automated meshing
systems, which require one vendor, etc. Plus, I know what that is going to
do vs some unknown algorithm doing something unforeseen. Really, other than
rapid STP, what else can these things do!
-Original Message-
Fro
Hi,
They just want to see that user A went to site B at time C. They
basically just want to be Big Brother on their network (and it's a
government agency, so they can).
For the more technical people, the best packet tracking program I have
ever seen is IpAudit. We have run it on our own backb
Hi,
I have a large customer that is looking for a device that will log all
of their internet traffic in and out of their network. However, unlike
Ethereal or anything like that, they need something that is _very_ easy
to use (web interface, with full logs so they can go back months at a
time)
Trend Micro, Their Interscan Gateway box is GREAT, not cheap, but great.
Else, they have a IWSS (Interscan Web Security Suite). This is a proxy
server, but you can configure it to be transparent. If they are part of a
domain, its easy enough to configure, and it will track the usage across
userna
On Mon, October 29, 2007 9:01 pm, Travis Johnson wrote:
> I have a large customer that is looking for a device that will log all
> of their internet traffic in and out of their network.
What problem are they trying to solve, where they think this is what they
want?
This would take a LOT of disk
Do they want to be able to actually disect packet contents or just
connection information? If they don't need contents than anything that
stores netflow data will work on the gathering side and your border
router should support netflow.
Sam Tetherow
Sandhills Wireless
Travis Johnson wr
I understood from a vendor who was looking to sell me a calea solution
that they would bill us for the cost of each intercept, etc, but not
expect us to pay them until we get re-reimbursed by the government.
Light bulb went off.
Jeff Broadwick wrote:
In theory, you should be able to bill th
One more question- I need 100Meg Ethernet (copper)as well- can you add a
card for that or is there a combo that will do 10/100/1000 copper?
MArfty
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Martha Huizenga
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 1:32 PM
To: W
This is from RIPE-55 meeting It made me laugh. While funny, it
strikes of a somewhat serious tone.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_y36fG2Oba0
--
Adam Kennedy
Sr. Network Administrator
Cyberlink International
Phone: 888-293-3693 x4352
Fax: 574-855-5761
---
In theory, you should be able to bill the government for your time/costs
incurred for THE INTERCEPT, not any recurring or upfront charges. In
theory...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dylan Bouterse
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 1:33 P
Hi Dylan,
I am not compensating for this. I am not sure that customers would be
appreciative or understand. Also, the costs that you are referring to
could possibly happen only when you are given a subpoenaed unless you
are paying a monthly fee for a product you bought from a vendor.
Martha
I guess from the lack of response nobody is compensating for their CALEA
costs?...or maybe my email didn't make it to the list?
Dylan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dylan Bouterse
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 5:25 PM
To: WISPA General L
John Valenti wrote:
Mark,
What don't you like about the Lucaya enclosures?
I have one of the 1208 versions to evaluate. I think I like it a lot.
The built-in antenna seems like it should be good enough for LOS
customers out to a mile, and with our trees few people would have LOS
beyond that
Mark,
What don't you like about the Lucaya enclosures?
I have one of the 1208 versions to evaluate. I think I like it a lot.
The built-in antenna seems like it should be good enough for LOS
customers out to a mile, and with our trees few people would have LOS
beyond that anyway.
If I wan
Forbes,
You brought up an interesting point of view.
The definition of someone selling "Internet" access.
Yes, Consumers believe the term "Internet" to be OPEN access in terms of
NetNeutrality.
And likely could be considered deceptive or Fraud to advertise "Internet"
for sale and it not be open
Tom DeReggi wrote:
I've been argueing for YEARS, that revenue is way over rated as a method
to evaluate a company's worth. There are so many other more important
factors such as how much revenue will your company enable the buyer to
obtain because they have your assets.
How is that argument g
Download the MIT roofnet project files , then select an SOC hardware
platform and
several of you get together hire a linux systems architect on contract
and have him
re-compile to your chosen platform.
Or you could beat the distro (forge it) into submission on the SOC
platform chosen yourselves,
18 matches
Mail list logo
