> How much real throughput do they need? Any idea of the average packet size?
>
> You could use an ImageStream Rebel router for a WHOLE LOT less than the
> Cisco:
>
> http://www.imagestream.com/Rebel.html
Does the Rebel support 10GE interfaces?
--
Phil,
Swap out the CPEs first, then you can swap the APs. That is what I'm
doing and it seems to be working very well. The UBNT radios don't seem
to have a problem associating to the older APs. I use StarOS for the
APs instead of Tranzeo, but that shouldn't make much dif
I will be exercising my right to civil disobedience in the event that
something like this comes to pass. This would never make it through
the court/judiciary system, so I'm fairly certain it won't be a problem.
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
On 1/25/2011 7:22 PM, St. Louis Broad
> If you want DFS2 legal the only thing I am aware of is moto
>
> Anything (old) DFS that is not already in the air is not legal to hang.
>
> There is a slough full of stuff that is pending DFS2 certification including
> ubiquity.
When will Ubiquiti be approved? Roughly?
--
Looking for some gear to do 4 short hops under a mile and not interfer
with existing 2.4 or 5.7 gear. Was thinking of the 5.2 or 5.4 band
gear. Whats out there that wont break the bank and is FCC compliant
in that band? Leaning towards canopy but would like more bandwidth
and a lower price.
--
now there is a great chance that she will be on the final
stage of the pageant. Best wishes to you Theresa!
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org
Wow Michael,
That was an outstanding post. Thank you for taking the time to put it
together.
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
On 1/13/2011 11:31 PM, michael mulcay wrote:
Fred,
Tom DeReggi's comments were business-case based and constructive;
basically exploring whether the Commission
>>I've got a small network with a MT RB-750 and UBNT (PS2's, NSL2's,
>>NSLM5's, NSM5's and a BulletM2) and I'm wondering how we're going to
>>fair if/when our upstream throws the switch on IPv6. I'd like to
>>hear someone else is already doing it.
>>
>>Our "upstream" apparently is Hughesnet being r
> We still have IP space in our name that we haven't even had that carrier
> for 5+ years...
Does it affect your ability to get additional space from ARIN? That's
my concern.
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://sig
We have returned some IP space to our upstream few days ago. How long
does it typically take for them to update the WHOIS data so it no
longer points to us?
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
I just had it confirmed that it is dual band concurrently.
On 01/06/2011 08:53 PM, Robert West wrote:
But
will they be Dual Band concurrently or will they run only
either or?
Below is what I sent to Sprint for their approval. It took 90 days
for Sprint to respond but I got permission. I have some of the other
earth stations contact information if you need it. -Cheers
Dear Robin Cohen,
I was given your email by Jerry Richardson
I'm looking to pickup a gig IP pipe from them this summer. My research
so far shows that they should be comparable to Cogent, and even better
in some ways. We shall see!
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
On 1/3/2011 12:43 PM, Matt wrote:
>> Anyone else having trouble bringing up www.h
> Anyone else having trouble bringing up www.he.net?
It appears to be only a temporary DNS issue. http://dns.he.net/
Routing is fine. We have a server on he.net bandwidth for 6 months
and they have always worked great.
---
Anyone else having trouble bringing up www.he.net?
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
WISPA Wireless List: wireles
Are there any other sites similiar to fixedorbit.com to determine how
well a host is peered?
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
-
white space" spectrum -- or
even scraps of licensed spectrum that are going unused -- we will have
all the spectrum we need.
Time to roll!
Matt Larsen
Vistabeam.com
Wirelesscowboys.com
WISPA Wants You!
Question out of curiosity. What does Tier1 carrier have for bandwidth
between a couple major cities? Say between Chicago and St. Louis?
How many Gigabit typically? I know it likely varies and there will be
multiple routes but I was looking for an educated guesstimate. I
imagine there would need
C VPN out to Verizon that the voice traffic goes over.
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 11:36 AM, David E. Smith wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 11:28, Matt wrote:
>>> Anyone using one of these? What are actual bandwidth requirements and
>>>
Can you post what latency looks like when using 1400 byte packets at
least 10 ever second?
Thanks,
- Matt
On 12/16/2010 12:06 PM, David Sovereen wrote:
> The current firmware works very well. If you haven't done so already,
> upgrade to the latest firmware, as it resolves tons
> Are you referring to this?
> http://support.vzw.com/information/network_extender.html
> I've not used that one, but I've used a similar device from Sprint. For
> calls, the bandwidth used is negligible (40-50kbps).
> The Verizon one supports EVDO data (Sprint's Airave femtocell didn't, IIRC),
> s
Thinking a bit about ATMail now.
http://www.atmail.com/linux-email-server/
Seems pretty feature rich.
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--
Anyone using one of these? What are actual bandwidth requirements and usage?
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
W
> If the disk space requirements allow go buy some large SSD Intel drives and
> your disk IO problem will likely go away.
>
> I don't buy anything but SSD any more unless I can't fit what I need on one.
> We have a larger one I put in our mail server and its not a fast machine but
> the perform
> Just change your DNS Settings for your domain name. Did you think Google
> was going to put a server in your facility?
> Regards,
Asked that, was told no. Wanted to just use a cname to point at them.
Don't think a cname is allowed on an MX though. Wanted to use an
aname to just point at the
> http://www.ikano.com/vendor/googleapps-key-features_vendor.asp
>
> .35 cents a user a month. $4.20 a user per year.
I am hearing to switch to google all my users must change there SMTP
and POP3 settings to point at google. Ugh, not gonna happen.
---
> Great stuff...can't say enough good about VMware and their support. Dell
> support has been fantastic too.
I think Redhat uses KVM?
http://www.redhat.com/virtualization/rhev/server/
Imagine it will work its way into CentOS soon. How does it compare to VMware?
--
Anyone used iRedMail?
http://www.iredmail.org/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wi8CF3RKRm4
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--
> I put everything on virtual servers. There's no reinstallation,
> reconfiguration, etc. required to migrate to new hardware. Just install
> on the host OS on a new box and migrate the container over.
I have heard that for I/O intensive applications they are not a good
choice. Email is definit
Our current email server is getting a bit over loaded. Disk I/O is
getting to be an issue on it. Hosting about 2000 accounts. Likely
just going to move current solution to a bigger and newer RAID array.
Before I do that thought I would ask what other solutions are out
there? Prefer to keep it i
> I'll have to check...many hundreds, I guess. It's the paid-for
> collaboration suite. You get support, too.
> I use the OUTLOOK Connector and it's great. Every PC I've got is always
> exactly like every other PC I've got...all OUTLOOK folders, sent stuff,
> calendar, contacts, etc.
>
> When I
> We, too, have the complete suite and it has been absolutely wonderful
> . . . J o n a t h a n
How many email accounts? Open Source version?
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--
Anyone using Zimbra Open Source Edition as an email server? Feedback?
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
WISPA Wi
> Below is a list of companies that have filed their letters on the Network
> Neutrality Open Internet proposal thus far. The deadline is tomorrow at
> 5:30 pm EST. We need much better involvement than this to impact the
> decision. Thank you to those who have done this already. It is best to
>
I think it would be good if we California WISPs mention that the
CPUC (California Public Utilities Commission) includes us in their
Mobile coverage?
On 12/13/2010 08:11 AM, Rick Harnish wrote:
Below is a list of companies that ha
> We do this today with Mikrotik routers. Don't need the bgp part of it for
> "just" a backup service.
Pretty sure this 'wont' work without BGP if you want your clients
public IP's to be directly accessable.
WISPA
> For our friends up North.
Would like to see dry loop on AT&T but last I heard no go?
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--
Does anyone know of a DSL provider that supports BGP on DSL? Looking
simply for a redundancy circuit.
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
---
replacing it with
Mikrotik in another month or so.
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
On 11/26/2010 9:16 AM, Jason Hensley wrote:
> Hmm, I ran into issues with NAT'ing that many customers too. I had to break
> it out better than what I had. My issues were similar to what you'
> profile on facebook. Don't know if is our network or what. We have 3
> 5mbps/1mbps dsl lines that really give us 4.5/800. We have about 120
Just curious, do you NAT everyone?
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://si
Just for clarification, UBNT-Hal is in Georgia.
On 11/25/2010 06:53 PM, Chuck Hogg wrote:
I don't even think WHT is saying much about it...from
what people say about him, he's a big beta/alpha tester. If you
look at the GPS Coordinates from the page, it shows L
Has anyone here tried this out?
http://cachevideos.com/
I this sounds like a great idea in theory.Interested to see if it
works as well in practice.
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
WISPA Wants You! Join today
That one only has an 8.5* vertical pattern. Not very good for most
> locations.
>
> That's why I really like to stay down around 8 dB. They have 12ish dB of
> vertical.
>
> I'll try this one and see how it does though.
>
> thanks,
> marlon
>
> - Origin
awesome thanks! I didn't realize you could specify a != that simplifies
a bunch of other filters I have setup before.
On 11/15/2010 04:06 PM, Butch Evans wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 14:46 -0800, Matt Jenkins wrote:
>
>> I have 6 virtual wlan interfaces. I want to prevent
; "public" interface when that traffic will leave on the "public"
> > interface (i.e. "internet traffic").
> > 2. Drop all other traffic that enters the router from any interface that
> > is not "public" (i.e. enter on "lan" and leave on "otherlan").
> >
> >
> ---
In this instance, I have no control upstream beyond the mikrotik
On 11/15/2010 03:16 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
You can only have 1 dhcp server port per interface. You'll need
to do vlans.
On Nov 15, 2010 6:12 PM, "Matt Jenkins" <m...@smarterbroadband.net>
wrote:
&
Ok simplification of what I need to do. I need to get more than 1 DHCP
address on the same physical ethernet port I can assign more than 1
static address, so why not more than 1 dynamic address?
On 11/02/2010 01:15 PM, Matt Jenkins wrote:
> How do I create a subinterface on an ethernet p
?
WLAN1 - 10.66.1.1/24
WLAN2 - 10.66.2.1/24
etc
All are NATed to a different public IP on eth1.
Thanks,
- Matt
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org
Larsen RO5810NF 10dbi Omni with N-Female connector.
On 11/15/2010 10:42 AM, Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I need a 5 gig omni. 8 or 9 dB.
>
> I've got one from Winncomm but I don't like it much. The mount seems to
> place the raydome below the mounting bracket etc.
>
> What are folks us
What about pnp4nagios for graphing and nagvis for map of network?
Have you looked at NINJA for nagios?
On 11/15/2010 09:45 AM, Mark Nash wrote:
We have Nagios for monitoring/alerting on:
- wireless network components : up/down, flapping, signal levels, is ssh interface res
Anyone have photos or know how to disassemble NanoStation M5? Curious
whats inside. ;<)
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
-
>
> http://www.3dbwireless.com/boyd/
>
Any word on the how and when of GPS sync?
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
So when will the 3.65 NanoStations be here?
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa
Put up an AP using StarOS and "noisebuster" mode nearby on an
overlapping channel. Watch their 5.8 backhaul magically disappear and
be replaced by something else within a fairly short period of time.
Problem solved.
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
On 11/9/2010 10:56 PM, Jeromie Re
finding the right board.
- Matt
On 11/09/2010 01:24 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Even at the same tx power the XR2 has a better receive
sensitivity - that's what I like about it. Picks up the laptops
talking better.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
/2010 3:11 PM, Matt Jenkins wrote:
Why the extra for an XR2 vs 1/3 the cost for a R52?
On 11/09/2010 12:54 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
It looks to me like the rb411ahr (or whatever has the
radio built in) would work. If you need a better radio get an rb411a +
xr2. You only get ONE
with the rb493ah and xr2 - too many ports is better
then not enough.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Matt Jenkins
<m...@smarterbroadband.net>
wrote:
I
will need to do 1 simple que
xr2 - too many ports is better
then not enough.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Matt Jenkins
<m...@smarterbroadband.net>
wrote:
I
will need to do 1 simple queue per customer for thro
nd such, an RB493AH
> might be worth the few extra dollars.
>
> Sneaky one-liner to block inter-client traffic...
>
> /ip firewall filter add chain=forward \
>in-interface=!ether1 out-interface=!ether1 action=drop
>
>
> -Kristian
>
> On Tue, 2010-11-09 at 12
With the only certified antenna for the RocketM900 being the 13dbi panel
I am skeptical about its performance. In addition the LocoM900 is only
7dbi. I however am losing access to 900 due to the smart meters in the
area. AirSelect might help with performance and maintain some ability to
use 900
We just flipped from booking an install to doing site surveys. Even
when checking google earth and radio mobile approximately 50% of
installs booked would fail due to foliage being in the way. We can have
over 1 hour drive time to get to some of these locations. For us its
much more sensible to
We use bungee cords, preferably the kind with the carabiners on each
end. One in the front and one in the back. They have never failed. Only
people have caused failures so far.
On 11/08/2010 12:48 PM, Steven McGehee wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Got a situation that I think a lot of you all probably deal
How long has Exalt been doing licensed gear? Is it pretty good gear?
Does SAF allow you to use a dual polarity dish in 11ghz and bond both
polarities for additional bandwidth? Can both polarities be done on
the same channel?
--
If you want to leverage dual pol with XPIC you could look at Dragonwave
quantum.
On 11/04/2010 02:20 PM, Matt wrote:
> We are looking at upgrading our network and adding a handful(7) 11ghz
> licensed hops. What gear out there can use both horizontal and
> vertical at once to increase t
We are looking at upgrading our network and adding a handful(7) 11ghz
licensed hops. What gear out there can use both horizontal and
vertical at once to increase throughput? We are currently considering
Exalt. Short coming of 11 ghz and longish 25 mile hops is throughput.
We do not need a lot o
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 1:04 AM, Tom DeReggi wrote:
>> Note: Quagga has been very reliable for quite some time now. Imagestream and
>> Vyatta both use Quagga. Both are great choices for BGP routers.
>
> Although it's a different scenario, the IXP folks beg to differ about
> Quagga reliability. Wh
Does anyone have some pictures of mounting a 4 - 6 foot dish to a
largish ~4 foot face tower? Just curious what kind of brackets are
typically used.
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
> We had problems with 4.10 and went back to 4.3 and all is well.
> Haven't had a reason to upgrade to 4.11 but we'll probably just move
> straight to 5.0.
Heard from Mikrotik on forums that lookups with BGP could be related
to OSPF and its fixed in v4.13 and latest v5RC. My understanding the
OSP
>> Our MikroTik BGP router keeps crashing about once every month or
>> so...sometimes sooner, sometimes later. We are using full BGP tables
>> and 4.11 currently.
Heard on Mikrotik forums 4.10 is more stable for BGP. When it crashes
are there warning signs like high memory or CPU usage?
--
those sub interfaces
to each of cooresponding customer interfaces.
Thanks,
- Matt
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
---
> No, we have to hard reboot it.
> Regards,
What kind of hardware is it running on? Have you checked memory?
> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Matt wrote:
>>> Our MikroTik BGP router keeps crashing about once every month or
>>> so...sometimes sooner, sometimes la
> Our MikroTik BGP router keeps crashing about once every month or
> so...sometimes sooner, sometimes later. We are using full BGP tables
> and 4.11 currently.
When it crashes does it reboot itself?
WISPA Wants You
> AS # is for BGP advertisements. Akamai has a program for ISPs who use a
> good deal of bandwidth to their network.
> http://www.akamai.com/html/partners/network_program.html
>
> Basically you give them your AS (you have to be multi homed) and they
> see if you meet the minimum bandwidth to
> We have two full tables running on mikrotik, in two different locations.
>
> Running that command
> /ip route print count-only where bgp-as-path="1234"
> Replacing the AS with "33363" (local cable company).
> Doesn't work on either of our routers for some reason (MT 5.0rc1 or 4.4).
I don't suppo
>> Anyone know of a GigE version of this?
>>
>> DMC-300SC 100BASE-TX to 100BASE-FX Multimode SC Media Converter
>> http://www.dlink.com/products/?pid=596
>
> D-Link DMC-700SC http://www.dlink.com/products/?pid=DMC-700SC
> TPLINK MC200CM
> http://www.tp-link.com/products/productDetails.asp?pmodel=M
> I know copper GigE states a 100m(350') distance limit but is there
> much elbow room in there? With shielded Cat-6 could I get 425'
> stable?
Anyone know of a GigE version of this?
DMC-300SC 100BASE-TX to 100BASE-FX Multimode SC Media Converter
http://www.dlink.com/products/?pid=596
> You could push more, but not much bandwidth. We have cat-5 and cat-6 runs
> going 400+ feet up a tower linked at 100meg. You won’t be able to get a
> 1000M connection out of it though.
THis is for a licensed radio with a GigE POE port.
So is there a POE Fiber--> Copper(GigE) thingy in exist
I know copper GigE states a 100m(350') distance limit but is there
much elbow room in there? With shielded Cat-6 could I get 425'
stable?
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
---
Looking for a manged VLAN switch with ~8 GigE ports. Anyone know of
anything? Going to use them along a few hop licensed link.
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
-
How does Akamai determine which server/IP to stream a netflix movie
from? Suppose you peer with a couple providers and you want it to go
over the cheapest or biggest pipe?
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.
What is the power draw of the 1100?
On 10/29/2010 04:15 PM, Mark Nash wrote:
> Well Butch you like very much to tell people "that's not what I said" when
> someone disagrees with you.
>
> Well That's not what I said. You took that leap.
>
> I wasn't comparing x86...don't even remember typing
Does anyone know of a company with stock of these? I am possibly looking
for 6-8 of them.
Thx,
- Matt
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org
Bridgewave now has an 18ghz and 23ghz product that will do 1gbps.
On 10/28/2010 07:47 AM, Paolo Di Francesco wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I was wondering if somebody of you is working at those frequencies, on
> moutain top or heavy-rain
>
> The point is that I am curious to know your experience at those
>
removed from the yahoo and aol blacklists. Dammit!
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org
JPEG every ~60 seconds?
Matt
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Uns
.
Matt Larsen
mlar...@vistabeam.com
On 10/26/2010 9:47 AM, Steve Barnes wrote:
Ryan,
I like all those Tranzeo options as well. I did not know the ram was
so tight on them. I just thought that the ability to put ROS on them
and if it worked with Nstreame2 would solve some of my over
.
> RELENTLESS!
If you have a Mikrotik gateway router there are MANY ways to stop this.
http://www.google.com/search?q=bruteforce&sitesearch=http://wiki.mikrotik.com&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8
Matt
WISPA W
Shaver yes: http://www.tomsoft.co.uk/iphone/shaver.htm
On 10/20/2010 09:01 PM, RickG wrote:
Does an iphone include a shaver & swiss knife yet? :)
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 8:21 PM, John Thomas
wrote:
I
have no idea if this would be on any use to anyone, but it seem
Through heavy foliage (4 miles and 20 oak trees), when using 3.65 vs
900 Motorola equipment I got better downlink but worse uplink. This was
because the CPE is only 2x1 MIMO (has only one TX radio). I believe the
use of a true 2x2 MIMO 3.65 CPE will perform better than most 900
systems in some
reproduce the amount of path loss due
to foliage when compared to most links I have deployed in 900mhz.
Thanks,
- Matt
On 10/14/2010 06:16 PM, Brian Webster wrote:
The request was made for the simple reason of being able to use the 40 mw
devices in a split radio architecture. If anyone caught
Would you mind highlighting (bold or something) what
has changed?
On 10/12/2010 05:43 AM, Rick Harnish wrote:
I just sent out an announcement for the new
WISPA Listserv
Policy. I have opened this thread to address any comments, questions
and
concerns about the new policy. The
BellSouth Territories).
Got a quote from them at one of our locations. Turns out I have a ~50
mile loop. FastE not available so next step was OC3. Shudder$$$ How
price wise would GigE compare to OC3? Also, how do I find how m
I can get Cogent for $600 per month for 100/100 meg!
Just have to BH it 44 miles..
On 10/04/2010 12:55 PM, support wrote:
Tell them you pay $200 per month for A 50/50 meg link can you beat
that? :)
On 10/4/2010 2:46 PM, Cameron Kilton wrote:
I just laugh at them and say,
s the difference between engineers playing
with formulas and lawyers in a hurry to draft something that they
barely
understand while making political compromises.
BUMMER! This would have solved my HAAT problem. The nearest station
from me is about 70km away.
- Matt
On 10/01/2010 11:56 AM,
Thanks for the explanation. I think I understand it. I
have a couple more quick questions.
What is the difference between co-channel and adjacent channel?
Does that mean if I am more than 68 km from a station I can operate a
fixed TVWS Base station at up to 600 meters HAAT?
- Matt
On 10
What are the headings for your chart? I don't
understand it
On 09/30/2010 08:13 PM, Fred Goldstein wrote:
At 9/30/2010 10:37 PM, Jack Unger wrote:
Fred,
I'm sorry to seem dense but I don't understand your explanation below.
I'd appreciate it if you would re-explain. The FCC said:
Why Exalt over Dragonwave or SAF?
On 09/29/2010 12:49 PM, Marco Coelho wrote:
We're looking at the exalt ExploreAir for these links. Anyone using
them in 11 GHz?
I'd like some first hand feedback.
Marco
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 2:02 PM, David E. Smith wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 20
Only one at a time. :(
On 09/28/2010 11:10 AM, Jim Patient wrote:
Radio Mobile
Jim Patient
Cell: 314-565-6863
Desk: 636-692-4200
YIM: jeffcosoho
www.wlan1.com
www.linktechs.net
www.wifimidwest.com
On 9/28/2010 11:14 AM, Matt Jenkins wrote:
Does anyone know of a tool to
s of swapping most
of my 900 customer base to TVWS. I am wondering how many of them will
be above the limit...
On 09/28/2010 10:38 AM, Cameron Crum wrote:
for what purpose?
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Matt
Jenkins <m...@smarterbroadband.net>
wrote:
Does
anyone know of a tool to
Most dual band antennas I have seen work by putting one
frequency on vertical and one frequency on horizontal.
On 09/28/2010 08:01 AM, Nick White wrote:
Anyone have ideas on a dual band(2.4Ghz and 5Ghz), dual polarity dish?
I found this, but it appears to be single polarity
http://www.t
501 - 600 of 2030 matches
Mail list logo