That sounds like complete malarkey to me. I’m sure cambium would like to hear
about that as I’m happily running all my 450i sectors in some areas at 10 or
20mhz.
I was once told by an well-schooled rf engineer that 900mhz required frequency
hopping to be legal.
If your power is
It's not that I don't want the band used by my competitors, I just want it to
remain a useful spectrum for what its best at: long range PtP communications.
Our competitors have access to the band the same way we do and that's a good
thing.
We absolutely need the part 101 bands to
I think the 6Ghz band need to stay for PtP links only. As for band sharing I
think that the need for reliable wireless back-haul far outweighs any benefit
of moving the band completely to part 15.
Use of this band for PtMP applications should not be permitted and all
installations should
Based on that interpretation Dish and Dierct-tv would not be completely exempt
as they use power over Coax for some of their technology. Hughesnet and Exeede
would certainly be affected as well. That would completely destroy their cheap
contractor business model.
This is honestly
Considering V.A. doesn't have a separate certification for low voltage, I
certainly hope we're excluded. It would be difficult to get all of our
technicians though a 3 year apprenticeship as required by law for a full
certification.
-Original Message-
From: "Matt Hoppes"
IIRC the mac address randomizing code was[ half-baked and not random enough
]( https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/03/10/mac_address_randomization/ ) to be
anonymous. Android more or less gave up on the feature and it's hardly
implemented at all. But either way it's not a brand issue it's
Jokes aside:
That sounds too "gray area" for my liking personally. While it's all
"technically" legal but still pushes some ethical issues with potential
collection of MAC addresses from unwitting parties.
Not that Lowe's and Target have any trouble with similar techniques.
