For the profile, I use RadioMobile and export the path to a text
file. I then put the first 2 columns into the second tab on the
spreadsheet. Works great.
On Nov 13, 2005, at 2:03 PM, Dylan Oliver wrote:
Paul,
I haven't tried the Spectra yet but am planning some links with the
Link
260-918-4340 VoIP
www.oibw.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Hendry
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 2:08 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532
Just as a rough guide
Will do.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rick Harnish
Sent: 15 November 2005 02:13
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532
Paul,
Send me the coordinates of the link and pictures from antenna height
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of G.Villarini
Sent: 11 October 2005 02:38
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532
They only thing I haven't opened yet is my set of Orthogon Spectras ... too
expensive ..
Gino A. Villarini,
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp
Paul,
I haven't tried the Spectra yet but am planning some links with the
Link Estimator. Are you familiar with this tool? You may have to attend
a training session to get access to the partner site and profile
generator. However I'd be happy to generate a path report for you ..
the tool is quite
:04
To: WISPA
General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Atheros speed
WRAP vs RB532
Paul,
I haven't tried the Spectra yet but am planning some links with the Link
Estimator. Are you familiar with this tool? You may have to attend a training
session to get access to the partner site and profile
, November 13, 2005 4:35 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532
Hey Gino,
Are you using the Spectra's in a NLOS environment? If so, what sort
of obstructions are there and what kind of throughput can you get? Looking
to get a pair for a link but a bit
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532
UPDATE
Just tested with 2 P4's at each end of a StarVX link running on the 2 port
WAR (266Mhz CPU). Bi-direction test using TCP, random data (uncompressible)
shows 35-36mbps in both directions (aggregate throughput of 70-72mbps
' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 13:10:44 +0100
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532
UPDATE
Just tested with 2 P4's at each end of a StarVX link running on the 2 port
WAR (266Mhz CPU). Bi-direction test using TCP, random data (uncompressible)
shows 35
Paul,
Was this turbo mode or standard?
Thanks
Dan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Paul Hendry
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 8:11 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532
UPDATE
Just
Paul Hendry wrote:
If your asymmetric performance with the RB532's is between 12 and 18mbps I
wouldn't say your seeing similar performance as I am seeing 40mbps and
27.7mbps when transmitting and receiving at the same time using random
(uncompressible) tcp based data.
I just meant similar as
:29
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532
Paul,
Was this turbo mode or standard?
Thanks
Dan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
Of Paul Hendry
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 8:11 AM
To: 'WISPA General
vs RB532
Indeed. And finding a clear 5 or 10Mhz is a lot easier than finding a clear
20Mhz.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of George
Sent: 11 October 2005 15:56
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532
Paul
Of Tom DeReggi
Sent: 10 October 2005 23:59
To: Lonnie Nunweiler; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532
Oops...
I'm using 5.3G with 19 dbi antenna, estimating 2 db in cable loss, to meet
legal 30db limit. At a half mile, we calculated it to be -54db, and at 1/4
mile
Paul Hendry wrote:
as we have no intention
of using them at 20 or 40Mhz.
This to me is the beauty of the WAR StarVX platform.
The links I have up now are 10MHz.
With limited spectrum available to us, it's the frugal thing to do.
George
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
General List
Subject: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532
I just installed a link using CM9, Station Server, WRAP board, about 300
yards away LOS, with only a single client so far on AP to SU mode. The
radios associated at 54 mbps, and about -70 db, with a quality of 24/29.
All speed enhancement
300 yards with LOS with a signal of -70 dB? That sure seems low. You
either have another system real close or you have severe trouble with
antenna or cabling. A Superpass 21 dB at that range would give you
-40 dB or better signals, assuming proper cabling.
Did you set the distance to a couple
The wraps have a limitation, maybe the client does as well.
Turn on the advanced features and it will go more speed.
Buy WAR boads and StarVX and go TWICE as fast or use HALF the channel space.
George
Tom DeReggi wrote:
I just installed a link using CM9, Station Server, WRAP board, about
Sounds like you just want an external antenna jack on the Access5830. If
so, you might consider doing something similar to what the LastMileGear
guys do with the Canopy 5.7 gear.
-Matt
Tom DeReggi wrote:
I just installed a link using CM9, Station Server, WRAP board, about
300 yards away
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 5:14 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532
Sounds like you just want an external antenna jack on the Access5830. If
so, you might consider doing something similar to what the LastMileGear
guys do with the Canopy 5.7 gear.
-Matt
,
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.aeronetpr.com
787.767.7466
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 5:14 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532
Sounds
I just installed a link using CM9, Station Server, WRAP board, about
300 yards away LOS, with only a single client so far on AP to SU
mode. The radios associated at 54 mbps, and about -70 db, with a
quality of 24/29. All speed enhancement features enable, and
encryption turned off.
Using
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532
300 yards with LOS with a signal of -70 dB? That sure seems low. You
either have another system real close or you have severe trouble with
antenna or cabling. A Superpass 21 dB at that range would give you
-40 dB or better signals, assuming proper
Liotta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 5:14 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532
Sounds like you just want an external antenna jack on the Access5830. If
so, you might consider doing something similar to what the LastMileGear
Our test uses large packets and TCP. The problem is that the
bandwidth tester consumes a lot of the CPU, so the solution is to test
between machines on the edges, and thus get the true throughput
without the limitations of CPU speed.
Lots of guys have used desktop machines and found that the
Ahhh you've never cracked one open to see what's inside?
Ask Gino, you have to take everything apart and see what makes it tick.
:)
George
Matt Liotta wrote:
That's good to know if for no other reason than to use better coax
jumpers. It is really annoying that Trango uses RP-SMA connectors
Anyone picked up one of Valemount's new WAR boards and their modified
StarOS distribution for them (StarVX)?
David Smith
MVN.net
Yeppers, I have a couple of PtP links using the WAR StarVX.
Using cloaking, 5 and 10MHz channel spacing in 5 gig.
George wrote:
Anyone picked up one of Valemount's new WAR boards and their modified
StarOS distribution for them (StarVX)?
Yeppers, I have a couple of PtP links using the WAR StarVX.
Using cloaking, 5 and 10MHz channel spacing in 5 gig.
28 matches
Mail list logo
