ehalf Of Tom DeReggiSent: Monday, March 20, 2006 2:52
PMTo: WISPA General ListSubject: Re: [WISPA] Licensed Backhaul
options
Dustin,
You have showed
how using both Pols, can reduce the sensitivity requirements of the radio,
able to extend link distance, and likely
Charles Wu wrote:
Can you please explain how this is applicable in modern-day implementations
of TCP? From my limited understanding, Nagle is a relic of the past (been
replaced by TCP Westwood, etc)
Nagle is very old circa 1984 I believe, but it hasn't really be
replaced. Many folks would
Hi Matt,
To answer your questions from my relatively "limited" sales & marketing
point of view
>RFC 2018 SACK
Yes it is enabled -- if you purchase a copy of our report, it shows the
exact system parameters configured on the box (basically, >sysctl -a | grep
tcp)
>RFC 896 Nagle
Can you please e
: [WISPA] Licensed
Backhaul options
Dustin,
You have showed how using both Pols,
can reduce the sensitivity requirements of the radio, able to extend link
distance, and likely aid in NLOS (that could degrade signal) as well.
However, when Tackling noise, that
doesn't r
To: 'WISPA General List'
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 6:47
PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Licensed Backhaul
options
Charles you make a
good point, but Im going to throw a but in here:
but the
Orthogon / Canopy 300 radios will run also run at:
64 QAM
rom: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 11:49 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Licensed Backhaul options
Charles Wu wrote:
In an attenuated lab setup, running TCP (w/ Iperf), we see the
following results with the Spectra
20, 2006 1:56 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Licensed Backhaul options
We are running FreeBSD boxes w/ Gigabit Ethernet NICs
I don't know all the details, since I'm not the technical guy running the
tests, but I believe we are using "standard" 1500
ent: Monday, March 20, 2006 11:49 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Licensed Backhaul options
Charles Wu wrote:
> In an attenuated lab setup, running TCP (w/ Iperf), we see the
> following results with the Spectra @ the 300 Mbps data rate
>
>
>
> 1 Way TCP Max
Charles Wu wrote:
In an attenuated lab setup, running TCP (w/ Iperf), we see the
following results with the Spectra @ the 300 Mbps data rate
1 Way TCP Max: 143 Mbps
2 Way BiDirectional TCP Max: 98.1 / 105 Mbps
What TCP settings did you use to achieve the above?
-Matt
--
WISPA Wireles
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dustin
JurmanSent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 5:47 PMTo: 'WISPA
General List'Subject: RE: [WISPA] Licensed Backhaul
options
Dustin
Jurman
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles WuSen
day, March 19, 2006 6:10 PMTo:
WISPA General ListSubject: Re: [WISPA] Licensed Backhaul
options
Tom DeReggiRapidDSL & Wireless, IncIntAirNet- Fixed Wireless
Broadband
- Original Message -
From:
Charles Wu
To: 'WISPA General List'
--
WiNOG Austin, TX
March 13-15, 2006
http://www.winog.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of G.Villarini
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 7:54 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Licensed Backhaul options
Charles,
I
ISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Licensed Backhaul options
Charles,
Ill chime in here cause you can get a Spectra for $15 to $16k wheras a
Licensed link goes from $20k and up...
Gino A. Villarini,
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.aeronetpr.com
787.273.4143
List' <mailto:wireless@wispa.org>
*Sent:* Saturday, March 18, 2006 5:25 PM
*Subject:* RE: [WISPA] Licensed Backhaul options
The Spectra would be around $20k with external antennas. A
licensed product is going to be at least that, and probably $5k more.
Sit bac
ntAirNet- Fixed Wireless
Broadband
- Original Message -
From:
Charles Wu
To: 'WISPA General List'
Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2006 5:25
PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Licensed Backhaul
options
>The
Spectra would be around $20k with external antennas. A
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Charles Wu
Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2006
5:26 PM
To: 'WISPA
General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Licensed
Backhaul options
>The Spectra would be around $20k with external
antennas. A licensed product is going t
--
WiNOG Austin, TX
March 13-15, 2006
http://www.winog.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 10:03 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Licensed Backhaul options
---
WiNOG Austin, TX
March 13-15, 2006
http://www.winog.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 1:28 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Licensed Backhaul op
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
G.VillariniSent: Saturday, March 18, 2006 6:14 AMTo:
'WISPA General List'Subject: RE: [WISPA] Licensed Backhaul
options
Tad less … wit 2
footers about $17k
Gino A. Villarini,
Aeronet Wireless Broadband
Corp
March 13-15, 2006
http://www.winog.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of G.Villarini
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 7:54 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Licensed Backhaul options
Charles,
Ill chime in here cause you
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 11:51 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Licensed Backhaul options
A Trango sales person mentioned to me that they were thinking about
offering a licensed product. If the price is like the res
General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Licensed
Backhaul options
The Spectra would be around $20k with external
antennas. A licensed product is going to be at least that, and probably $5k
more.
Travis
Microserv
Charles Wu wrote:
You don't need licensed to high throughput backhaul. For ex
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 1:28 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Licensed Backhaul options
-Matt
Bobby Burrow wrote:
I'm looking at moving to a licensed solution to increase throughput
PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Charles Wu
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 8:46 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Licensed Backhaul options
You don't need licensed to high throughput backhaul. For example,
Orthogon's Spectra provides 300Mbps aggregate at a price point
neral List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Licensed Backhaul options
You don't need licensed to high throughput backhaul. For example,
Orthogon's Spectra provides 300Mbps aggregate at a price point generally
Less than 45Mbps licensed.
Hi Matt,
I am curious to see where / what you g
PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Charles Wu
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 8:46 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Licensed Backhaul options
>You don't need licensed to high throughput backhaul. For example,
>Orthogon's Spectra provides 300Mbps aggregate at a price point ge
al questions, feel free to ping me offlist
-Charles
---
WiNOG Austin, TX
March 13-15, 2006
http://www.winog.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bobby Burrow
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 1:21 PM
To: wireless@wispa.
Spectra?
-Charles
---
WiNOG Austin, TX
March 13-15, 2006
http://www.winog.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 1:28 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Licensed Backha
Thursday, March 16, 2006 11:21 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Licensed Backhaul options
I'm looking at moving to a licensed solution to increase throughput across
one of out backhaul links that spans 5 hops. Distances between hops range
anywhere from 7 to 19 miles.
We are currently using the d
You don't need licensed to high throughput backhaul. For example,
Orthogon's Spectra provides 300Mbps aggregate at a price point generally
less than 45Mbps licensed.
-Matt
Bobby Burrow wrote:
I'm looking at moving to a licensed solution to increase throughput across
one of out backhaul links
I'm looking at moving to a licensed solution to increase throughput across
one of out backhaul links that spans 5 hops. Distances between hops range
anywhere from 7 to 19 miles.
We are currently using the dual nstreme Mikrotik solution and it is working
very well, however the WRAP/RB532 solutions
31 matches
Mail list logo
