Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote:
> Except it's not effecting the ap's further out. Even if they were on a
> different segment they should still pick up the interference from the
> ap's right?
Basically, yeah. I think. :)
(Good thing I never claimed to know much about RF, innit.)
A differ
uot;
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 5:55 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Weird problem - 20 seconds latency and other oddness
I agree it could be noise but a bridge runaway will give you the 10+
second pings and with that much traffic being echoed ALL of your AP
and Clients are spewing. It would look like a
Lonnie Nunweiler wrote:
> I agree it could be noise but a bridge runaway will give you the 10+
> second pings and with that much traffic being echoed ALL of your AP
> and Clients are spewing. It would look like a massive RF flood on the
> Spectrum Analyzer. Think about what the air wave look like
I agree it could be noise but a bridge runaway will give you the 10+
second pings and with that much traffic being echoed ALL of your AP
and Clients are spewing. It would look like a massive RF flood on the
Spectrum Analyzer. Think about what the air wave look like when you
have full radio usage
Lonnie Nunweiler wrote:
> Any confirmation on this? A customer router plugged in with LAN to
> the WAN or not getting a DHCP entry or even a DNS entry has caused
> many bridges to collapse and appear as if it is noise, simply because
> the bridges are all echoing the massive broadcast traffic.
The
Any confirmation on this? A customer router plugged in with LAN to
the WAN or not getting a DHCP entry or even a DNS entry has caused
many bridges to collapse and appear as if it is noise, simply because
the bridges are all echoing the massive broadcast traffic.
Lonnie
On 5/8/06, Lonnie Nunweil
quot;
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 2:32 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Weird problem - 20 seconds latency and other oddness
I suspect your system is bridged. Can you confirm that?
Lonnie
On 5/8/06, David E. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Okay, Scriv and I are stumped on this one.
Over the last coup
my own wisp!
64.146.146.12 (net meeting)
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 1:10 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Weird pro
I suspect your system is bridged. Can you confirm that?
Lonnie
On 5/8/06, David E. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Okay, Scriv and I are stumped on this one.
Over the last couple of weeks, we've started seeing some very odd
oddness on a few of our 2.4GHz POPs. Not all, just some. Here's what
If this was rf noise, Arent hamm operators allowed in 2.4 with higher
power limits? Could this account for the 5- 10 mile affected area?
-Michael
David E. Smith wrote:
Okay, Scriv and I are stumped on this one.
Over the last couple of weeks, we've started seeing some very odd
oddness on a fe
Lots of possible causes (self-interference, interference from other
networks, too high an oversubscription/traffic level, etc.) but I'd
suggest pulling the AP packet-retransmit percentage statistics and
manually creating a bar graph with APs across the bottom and retrans
percent on the vertical
Are you graphing CPU utilization on your StarOS APs? That might help
provide a clue. If someone is getting DOSed or there is a broadcast
storm, you might see high CPU utilization before/during the problem.
Matt
David E. Smith wrote:
Okay, Scriv and I are stumped on this one.
Over the last
Okay, Scriv and I are stumped on this one.
Over the last couple of weeks, we've started seeing some very odd
oddness on a few of our 2.4GHz POPs. Not all, just some. Here's what
appears to be happening:
A couple times a day, usually during business hours, something somewhere
generates a massive a
13 matches
Mail list logo
