RE: [WISPA] MiniPCI wireless card recommendation...

2006-09-15 Thread chris cooper
Can anyone else confirm/deny this? Thanks Chris I thought the issue was that the cards are mis marked. Marked back wards. The outside corner is actually antenna port A . Card says B George Anthony Will wrote: It looks like he is talking about the antenna ports on the mPCI card. There are

Re: [WISPA] MiniPCI wireless card recommendation...

2006-09-15 Thread Lonnie Nunweiler
We set our software to use antenna A which is the corner antenna connector on the CM9 and the WLM54G. The WLM54G calls that antenna the secondary, so we are accepting it as a mis-marked part, or marked for another application. We see no difference between A and B in terms of performance.

RE: [WISPA] MiniPCI wireless card recommendation...

2006-09-15 Thread Mark McElvy
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lonnie Nunweiler Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 9:09 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] MiniPCI wireless card recommendation... We set our software to use antenna A which is the corner antenna connector on the CM9

RE: [WISPA] MiniPCI wireless card recommendation...

2006-09-14 Thread Harold Bledsoe
] On Behalf Of Mark McElvy Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 11:50 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: RE: [WISPA] MiniPCI wireless card recommendation... This afternoon I removed the Prism card and installed MT on a WRAP and the WLM54G. I currently only have 4 customers on it and only 2

RE: [WISPA] MiniPCI wireless card recommendation...

2006-09-14 Thread Mark McElvy
Did not try the other port and the signals were lower on both ends. Mark From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harold Bledsoe Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 6:21 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: RE: [WISPA] MiniPCI wireless card recommendation

Re: [WISPA] MiniPCI wireless card recommendation...

2006-09-14 Thread Mark Koskenmaki
Direct commercial inquiries to purchasing at neofast dot net - Original Message - From: Mark McElvy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 4:53 AM Subject: RE: [WISPA] MiniPCI wireless card recommendation... Did not try the other port

Re: [WISPA] MiniPCI wireless card recommendation...

2006-09-14 Thread John Scrivner
@wispa.org Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 4:53 AM Subject: RE: [WISPA] MiniPCI wireless card recommendation... Did not try the other port and the signals were lower on both ends. Mark From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harold

Re: [WISPA] MiniPCI wireless card recommendation...

2006-09-14 Thread Anthony Will
: RE: [WISPA] MiniPCI wireless card recommendation... Did not try the other port and the signals were lower on both ends. Mark From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harold Bledsoe Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 6:21 AM To: WISPA

Re: [WISPA] MiniPCI wireless card recommendation...

2006-09-14 Thread George Rogato
dot net - Original Message - From: Mark McElvy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 4:53 AM Subject: RE: [WISPA] MiniPCI wireless card recommendation... Did not try the other port and the signals were lower on both ends. Mark

RE: [WISPA] MiniPCI wireless card recommendation...

2006-09-13 Thread Paul Hendry
I would say that it depends on the application. The CM9 and the R52 use different generation of Atheros chipset. The main difference between the 2 chipsets is the newer chipset requires slightly less power to run and if you are running the card in 10MHz or 5MHz modes it will only listern

Re: [WISPA] MiniPCI wireless card recommendation...

2006-09-13 Thread Lonnie Nunweiler
Paul, What do you mean when you say the CM9 listens on the whole 20 MHz when set to 5 MHz mode? Lonnie On 9/13/06, Paul Hendry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would say that it depends on the application. The CM9 and the R52 use different generation of Atheros chipset. The main difference

Re: [WISPA] MiniPCI wireless card recommendation...

2006-09-13 Thread Sam Tetherow
Can you get the advanced atheros features in MT to work with the WLM54G? Things like the 5/10Mhz channels and VAP? They are there on the the CM9, but not supported on the older atheros 5212 cards. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Paul Hendry wrote: I would say that it depends on the

RE: [WISPA] MiniPCI wireless card recommendation...

2006-09-13 Thread Paul Hendry
, P. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lonnie Nunweiler Sent: 13 September 2006 17:56 To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] MiniPCI wireless card recommendation... Paul, What do you mean when you say the CM9 listens on the whole 20 MHz

RE: [WISPA] MiniPCI wireless card recommendation...

2006-09-13 Thread Harold Bledsoe
We are currently using both of the Compex cards you mention below with Wilibox software and are happy with the performance. Also, we have both of the cards in stock now. I think you will find the 54AG similar to the CM9 and the 54G has a little extra power to make it a bit further. The

RE: [WISPA] MiniPCI wireless card recommendation...

2006-09-13 Thread Mark McElvy
immediately with signals similar to the 200mW Prism. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harold Bledsoe Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 2:10 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: RE: [WISPA] MiniPCI wireless card recommendation... We are currently using