PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lonnie Nunweiler
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 9:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] MiniPCI wireless card recommendation...
We set our software to use antenna A which is the corner antenna
connector on the CM9
We set our software to use antenna A which is the corner antenna
connector on the CM9 and the WLM54G. The WLM54G calls that antenna
the secondary, so we are accepting it as a mis-marked part, or marked
for another application.
We see no difference between A and B in terms of performance.
Lonnie
Can anyone else confirm/deny this?
Thanks
Chris
I thought the issue was that the cards are mis marked. Marked back
wards. The outside corner is actually antenna port "A" . Card says B
George
Anthony Will wrote:
> It looks like he is talking about the antenna ports on the mPCI card.
> There ar
et
541-969-8200
Direct commercial inquiries to purchasing at neofast dot net
- Original Message - From: "Mark McElvy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 4:53 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] MiniPCI wireless card recommend
ehalf Of Harold Bledsoe
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 6:21 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] MiniPCI wireless card recommendation...
Did you try both antenna ports? On the two that connected, were the
signals 12 to 14dB lower on both sides of the link?
-Hal
--
WISPA Wire
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 4:53 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] MiniPCI wireless card recommendation...
Did not try the other port and the signals were lower on both ends.
Mark
From: [EMAIL PRO
at mark at neofast dot net
541-969-8200
Direct commercial inquiries to purchasing at neofast dot net
- Original Message -
From: "Mark McElvy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 4:53 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] MiniPCI wir
PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Mark McElvy
Sent: Wednesday, September 13,
2006 11:50 PM
To: WISPA
General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] MiniPCI
wireless card recommendation...
This afternoon I removed the Prism card
and installed MT on a WRAP and the WLM54G. I currently only have 4 customers on
it and only
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark McElvy
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 11:50 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] MiniPCI wireless card recommendation...
This afternoon I removed the Prism card and installed MT on a WRAP
and the WLM54G. I currently only have 4 customers on it and only 2
immediately with signals similar to the 200mW Prism….
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harold Bledsoe
Sent: Wednesday, September 13,
2006 2:10 PM
To: WISPA
General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] MiniPCI
wireless card recommendation...
We are currently
using
We are currently using both of the Compex cards you mention
below with Wilibox software and are happy with the performance. Also, we have
both of the cards in stock now.
I think you will find the 54AG similar to the CM9 and the 54G
has a little extra power to make it a bit further. Th
heers,
P.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lonnie Nunweiler
Sent: 13 September 2006 17:56
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] MiniPCI wireless card recommendation...
Paul,
What do you mean when you say the CM9 listens on the whole 2
Can you get the advanced atheros features in MT to work with the
WLM54G? Things like the 5/10Mhz channels and VAP? They are there on
the the CM9, but not supported on the older atheros 5212 cards.
Sam Tetherow
Sandhills Wireless
Paul Hendry wrote:
I would say that it depends on the a
Paul,
What do you mean when you say the CM9 listens on the whole 20 MHz when
set to 5 MHz mode?
Lonnie
On 9/13/06, Paul Hendry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would say that it depends on the application. The CM9 and the R52 use
different generation of Atheros chipset. The main difference bet
I would say that it depends on the
application. The CM9 and the R52 use different generation of Atheros chipset. The
main difference between the 2 chipsets is the newer chipset requires slightly
less power to run and if you are running the card in 10MHz or 5MHz modes it
will only listern to
15 matches
Mail list logo
