I would be interested in this session as well
On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 1:26 PM Christina Klam wrote:
> I want in.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Christina Klam
> Network Engineer
> Institute for Advanced Study
> 1 Einstein Dr
> Princeton, NJ 08540
> (m) +1 609-751-7899
> (o) +1 609-734-8154
> ck...@ias.edu
>
Will,
Sounds a little like this bug- CSCvn80477, only the bug mentions an older
8.5 release and on APs in static mode. I am currently running an escalation
build of 8.5 (8.5.160.4) and have not yet seen this behavior.
On Tue, Mar 3, 2020, 11:45 Will Dawes wrote:
> If this is a known reported
David,
We recently upgraded/redesigned the wireless network in several of our
apartment style buildings and have found in our case that it was easier to
mount the AP to the side of the existing faceplate and run a short cable
from the data jack to the AP. Currently we are using the Cisco AP1810W.
Here is the dump from an AP with a corrupt boot loader after software
upgrade/power cycle. Symptoms of the unit having this problem are no
console output after BootROM: Image checksum verificaiton FAILED and no
status LED lighting up. On the switch at my desk (WS-C2960CX-8PC), if you
plug in the
Sam,
Out of the roughly 400 2802 we have, 2 have failed due to experiencing boot
room image checksum failures. The symptoms show up after a power cycle, AP
draws power but status led stays off. If you console the AP you get
nothing. Cisco has bug id CSCvf47017 in reference to this problem.
On
Do you have the bug ID for the major HA bug?
On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 1:17 PM, Rick Coloccia wrote:
> Hi, yes, it is, but the 8.5.131 code that is out now has a major HA bug
> that is very hard to recover from.
>
> Cisco wireless engineers promised us code by the end of July that will
> address
Folks,
Does anyone else have an environment where dorm networks are routed from a
distribution router (eigrp stub) and the main campus wireless controllers
are directly attached to the core (router) and have a way to pass a vlan
that exists out a distribution router back to the wlc (creating an
>
> *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [
> mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
> <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>] *On Behalf Of *Alan D Wang
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 25, 2018 8:19 AM
> *To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
> *Subject:* R
Thanks everyone for the ideas. For those running Cisco AP1810W or AP1815W
does anyone use the plastic spacer kits that Cisco sells as an accessory?
If so, can anyone comment on the depth of one of these? I am curious to
know if you could possibly modify the spacer by drilling a hole on one of
the
Hello,
We are looking to possibly re-design the wireless deployment in several of
our older dorms this summer but would like to do this with minimal need to
move and/or add new junction boxes and cable runs. One issue we will run
into is that in newer rooms/common rooms the junction box that
What problems have you been seeing with HA and was this in 8.3 and/or 8.5?
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 7:34 PM, Joseph Bernard wrote:
> To expand, we instantly had issues with 8.5.105.0. We haven't tried
> 8.5.110.0 yet, but I'm sure our wireless team is looking for anything
>
Britton,
We have been running 8.3.133.0 on several pairs of 5520s and 8540s without
an issue. Our AP mix is 2602/3602, 2702/3702, 2802, and 1810w.
We haven't ran into any APs yet that have hit the flash bug.
On Dec 19, 2017 3:43 PM, "Britton Anderson" wrote:
Happy
Our setup:
Code: 8.3.121.0
APs: 2602, 3602, 2702, 3702, 2802 (roughly 230 of them), handful of 1810W,
and a couple 1142
Controllers: 2 8540 HA pairs and 1 5520 HA pair
We ended up needing to move to 8.3.121.0 due to a bug TAC was not going to
fix for the 1810W pertaining to the operations of the
We are beginning to upgrade several of our larger dorm buildings with 2800s
and haven't had scene any major problems with code (running 8.2.141.0 with
plans to upgrade to 8.3.121.0) or power (2960S series switches). One
concern that I have at the moment is that almost every unit that was
replaced
I would recommend you look at metageek's product line for this. Depending
on how in depth you want to go, you can either get inSSIDer pretty cheap or
spend a about 1000 and get a Wi-Spy dbx and Chanalyzer 5 to actually look
at RF utilization.
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Allen Matthews <
15 matches
Mail list logo