eply-To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu"
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Date: Thursday, December 1, 2016 at 4:35 AM
To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 5GHz Channel Width
For those with large d
AM
*To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
*Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 5GHz Channel Width
Our environment (residential) is about 80% Mac and I’ve not run into issues
with DBS. With a dense deployment, it’s rare that there would be a reason
to force a client to another AP as the number of clients
] On Behalf Of Jake Snyder
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 4:40 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 5GHz Channel Width
One things to keep in mind is that certain device manufacturers preference
wider channels. Apple in the Mac OS X products for instance, will always
ate: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 at 1:35 PM
> To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu
> <mailto:wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu>"
> <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
> <mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>>
> Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] 5GHz Channel Width
>
@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman
Sent: Thursday, 1 December 2016 12:39 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 5GHz Channel Width
Hi Donald,
I’m not quite following the questions. Where we are very dense and likely to
risk channel overlap with 40, we use 20. Examples
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Date: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 at 1:35 PM
To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] 5GHz Channel Width
Hi All,
I was just reading a blog article that heavily recommends not to use 40Mh
UCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Donald Ambrose
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 7:24 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 5GHz Channel Width
Any advice on manually setting up the 5 Ghz channels?
@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 5GHz Channel Width
20 in our dense spaces, 40 where it can be done safely- about 50/50.
Lee Badman (mobile)
On Nov 29, 2016, at 6:09 PM, Jason Cook
<jason.c...@adelaide.edu.au<mailto:jason.c...@adelaide.edu.au>> wrote:
It all comes down to
We run 40mhz in 5ghz for all our ap's (around 4,000). We monitor channel
utilization and interference but so far it
looks fine. Our argument was 40 or 80 and we decided to play it safe and do
just 40.
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> I was just reading a blog article that heavily recommends *not* to use
gt;
Reply-To: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Date: Wednesday, 30 November 2016 at 5:35 am
To: "WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] 5GHz Channel Width
Hi All,
<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] 5GHz Channel Width
Hi All,
I was just reading a blog article that heavily recommends not to use 40Mhz
channel width in multi-floor environments, particularly where many 5GHz radios
are used (particularly in our case with
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 5:49 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 5GHz Channel Width
I have seen real data where changing from 20/40 to 20 MHz only improved network
congestion by 30+%. I would say based on data that I see, a default config of
20 MHz
t 7:35 PM
To: <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] 5GHz Channel Width
Hi All,
I was just reading a blog article that heavily recommends not to use 40Mhz
channel width in multi-floor environments, particularly where many 5GHz radios
are used (particularly in ou
ph: 814.863.8715
fx: 814.865.3988
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Trinklein, Jason R
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 4:35 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] 5GHz Channel Width
Hi
14 matches
Mail list logo
