On 29/04/13 22:51, Barros, Jacob wrote:
It feels like I am coming full circle to where I was six years ago.
Though I know its not exactly the same, I went back to the thin vs
thick debates in the archives. A few things stood out to me as
considerations: One concern was vendor longevity.
] *On Behalf Of *Watters, John
*Sent:* Monday, April 29, 2013 11:55 AM
*To:* WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
*Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Distributed WiFi model - Thin vs Thick
debate revisited
** **
** **
What happens to client roaming, RF balancing, and channel selection
without
]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 9:10 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Distributed WiFi model - Thin vs Thick debate
revisited
Yes, I think there's a mistaken impression about the Aerohives and Merakis out
there. Some of it is FUD from the big iron vendors. Some
@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
*Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Distributed WiFi model - Thin vs Thick
debate revisited
Yes, I think there's a mistaken impression about the Aerohives and
Merakis out there. Some of it is FUD from the big iron vendors. Some of it
is old-timers like me questioning the over
Jake,
It seems that distributed architecture charge a yearly support fee per AP.
In the controller based world, we often skip AP support and self insure
ourselves due to our large deployments.
To keep in mind when the RFP comes back!!!
Also to consider:
-IP mobility
-Roaming: key exchange,
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Distributed WiFi model - Thin vs Thick debate revisited
Hello all. We are seriously considering replacing our Aruba infrastructure in
favor of a distributed model. We are having controller issues this academic
year and the appeal of a controller-less model is strong.
It feels
Operations Center
Cell:414-810-6789
Office:414-229-4972
- Original Message -
From: Jacob Barros jkbar...@grace.edu
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2013 9:51:30 AM
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Distributed WiFi model - Thin vs Thick debate revisited
Hello
-2564
[AusColl_Logo_Email]
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv [mailto:
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Barros, Jacob
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2013 9:52 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Distributed WiFi model - Thin vs
What types of controller issues are you seeing that you hope to be fixed
with a controller-less architecture?
**
Tim Cappalli*, *Network Engineer
LTS | Brandeis University
x67149 | (617) 701-7149
cappa...@brandeis.edu
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Barros, Jacob jkbar...@grace.edu wrote:
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Tim Cappalli
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2013 10:50 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Distributed WiFi model - Thin vs Thick debate
Of Jesse Safran
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2013 8:23 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Distributed WiFi model - Thin vs Thick debate
revisited
Aerohive is not cloud only. They do have a Virtual HiveManager that you can
run on VMWare. One of the things that really
: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Watters, John
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2013 11:55 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Distributed WiFi model - Thin vs Thick debate
revisited
What happens
@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
*Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Distributed WiFi model - Thin vs Thick
debate revisited
** **
Aerohive is not cloud only. They do have a Virtual HiveManager that you
can run on VMWare. One of the things that really makes them stand out from
Meraki, IMO.
** **
On Mon, Apr 29
13 matches
Mail list logo
