We have a deployment of over 1500 Meru access point connected to a mixture
of 16 3000 and 4100 controllers. Over the years we have had numerous
problems. Code upgrades may fix the immediate problem, but then cause a
new batch of issues. For example, the last upgrade we went from 4.0-105
to
On Apr 19, 2011, at 9:16 AM, Huels, Chris wrote:
We have a deployment of over 1500 Meru access point connected to a
mixture
of 16 3000 and 4100 controllers. Over the years we have had numerous
problems. Code upgrades may fix the immediate problem, but then cause a
new batch of issues.
Meru:
- What version of code are you running
Just upgraded to 4.0-150. So far it seems fine. It resolved the administration
interface lock ups we were seeing.
- What style of AP's do you use
We have mix of 208's and 311's.
- Do you use different style access points within the same air
Thanks for all the great feedback, it is appreciated. I have another question
regarding coexisting. Did anyone have Meru and Cisco running at the same time
and what issues did you see. Obviously with our current state of funding we
can't fork-lift replace our entire Cisco wireless system so
I have Meru running along side Cisco and 5G access points without any
issues. As I introduce Meru APs, I perform a site survey and try and
use a channel not being used by the Cisco APs. I still use the Meru
single-cell architecture as I complete each building and phase out all
the older
Hi Randy,
We're long time customers of Meru, have been please with the product
support. We have a mix of AP208s (a/g) AP320 (a/g/n), over 1100
altogether. We also use their EzRF product for managing the
controllers. We like the single channel architecture, which works well
for us. In
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Randy Ethridge
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 10:51 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] MERU wireless
I just heard a pitch for MERU and it almost sounds to good. Is anyone running
MERU and if so how do you like
: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 10:51 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] MERU wireless
I just heard a pitch for MERU and it almost sounds to good. Is anyone running
MERU and if so how do you like it and what problems have you run into ?
Thanks.
Randy Ethridge
Network Engineer V
Randy,
We have about 1100 AP320s right now and are installing a few hundred more over
the next month or two. We have been very happy with this system. There have
been no major issues and everything has worked as advertised. There have been
minor issues, as there are with every product, but
We have ~2300 APs on campus and are satisfied with the system.
There's some functionality (VLAN pooling, Native IPv6 support) that we
would like to see in the product.
-Neil
--
Neil Johnson
Network Engineer
Information Technology Services
The University of Iowa
Work: 319 384-0938
Mobile:
@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Randy Ethridge
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 10:51 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] MERU wireless
I just heard a pitch for MERU and it almost sounds to good. Is anyone running
MERU and if so how do you like it and what problems have you
Randy,
Franklin and Marshall College uses the Meru system. We have over 500
APs in production. We are very happy with the system. Feel free to
contact me directly if you would like more information.
Greg
On Apr 13, 2011, at 10:50 AM, Randy Ethridge wrote:
I just heard a pitch for MERU
A couple years ago we tested Meru, Aruba and Cisco wireless out in one of our
buildings to see which system would best fit our environment. During the Meru
test we had a serious failure caused by a bug in the code. Later I found out
there was a work around, but as a result of that I had the
, April 13, 2011 10:07 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] MERU wireless
We have ~2300 APs on campus and are satisfied with the system.
There's some functionality (VLAN pooling, Native IPv6 support) that we
would like to see in the product.
-Neil
--
Neil
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 11:08 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] MERU wireless
I was told by our local college last year already that Meru doesn't
support
IPv6 -- is that still
We plan on rolling out IPv6 on our secured SSID by at least World IPv6
day and have been running on a test SSID for several weeks now.
Using RA to assign the addresses.
No issues so far.
We have only tested it on 4.0 MR2.
-jim
On 4/13/2011 11:49 AM, Johnson, Neil M wrote:
Meru currently
Any updates on this?
Thanks,
===
BJ Pinsky
Manager, Network Engineering Project Mgmt.
Network Infrastructure, Columbia University IT (CUIT)
212.854.7962
On Dec 5, 2006, at 1:34 PM, debbie fligor wrote:
On Dec 5, 2006, at 12:18, Jack Vizelter wrote:
Recently, our users have been having
: [WIRELESS-LAN] Meru Wireless AP's Intel Wireless Cards
Any updates on this?
Thanks,
===
BJ Pinsky
Manager, Network Engineering Project Mgmt.
Network Infrastructure, Columbia University IT (CUIT)
212.854.7962
On Dec 5, 2006, at 1:34 PM, debbie fligor wrote:
On Dec 5, 2006, at 12:18, Jack
I'm late to the discussion, but wanted to throw in my two cents. We
recently deployed Meru in one dormitory with version 3.1.4-33. We had
multiple complaints of low or spotty connectivity. In most cases, a
driver update resolved the issue. In one case, we could not get the
Intel card to
On Dec 5, 2006, at 12:18, Jack Vizelter wrote:
Recently, our users have been having issues in connecting to our Meru
Wireless AP's on campus. These users were using the latest
Intel Pro wireless cards on their laptops. The fix that Meru support
suggested of disabling the power save mode on
20 matches
Mail list logo
