EDU>
Date: Monday, October 31, 2016 at 10:20 AM
To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Question about Cisco 1810w APs in residential
buildings
Thank you for the responses about rate limiting. A follow up quest
D. Sessler
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 11:22 AM
To:
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Question about Cisco 1810w APs in residential
buildings
On the question of rate limiting: I don’t do it. I prefer to invest
ESS-LAN@LISTSERV.
> EDUCAUSE.EDU>
> *Date: *Friday, October 28, 2016 at 9:28 AM
> *To: *"wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.
> EDUCAUSE.EDU>
> *Subject: *Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Question about Cisco 1810w APs in
> residential buildings
Of Jeffrey D. Sessler
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 11:22 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Question about Cisco 1810w APs in residential
buildings
On the question of rate limiting: I don’t do it. I prefer to invest in
additional bandwidth (when necessary
er 25, 2016 at 3:11 PM
To:
"wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu<mailto:wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu>"
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Question about Cisco 1810w APs in residential
buildings
Ian,
I
ERV.
> EDUCAUSE.EDU>
> *Date: *Tuesday, October 25, 2016 at 3:11 PM
> *To: *"wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.
> EDUCAUSE.EDU>
> *Subject: *Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Question about Cisco 1810w APs in
> residential buildings
>
>
>
> Ian
LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Question about Cisco 1810w APs in residential
buildings
We have cable TV and drilled out a 3/8 hole int eh side and mounted a Coax
adapter for use. I imagine over time that will not be necessary, but we have
not cut the cord yet.
The wall jac
t;
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Ian Lyons
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 1:16 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Question about Cisco 1810w APs in residential
buildings
We hav
]
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>]
On Behalf Of Josh Senn
Sent: 27 octobre 2016 10:00
To:
WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU<mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: R
Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Manon Lessard
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 10:16 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Question about Cisco 1810w APs in residential
buildings
Semi-related question: have any students complained
RV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>] On Behalf Of Thomas Carter
> Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 9:51 AM
> To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
> <mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
> Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Question about Cisco 1810w APs in residential
> buildings
>
Of Sullivan, Don
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 9:07 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Question about Cisco 1810w APs in residential
buildings
Our experience is in line with this statement. We use the Cisco 702 APs and
have found when they do get knocked off
ehalf Of Josh Senn
Sent: 27 octobre 2016 10:00
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Question about Cisco 1810w APs in residential
buildings
We did a pilot in one of our reshalls last year with the 702W (the 1810w
predecessor) with ~135 of them. We had around 3 tha
SS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>] On Behalf Of Ian Lyons
> Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2016 7:52 AM
> To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
> <mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
> Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Question about Cisco 1810w APs in residential
> buildings
>
> They are
s-lan@listserv.educause.edu"
<WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Date: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 at 3:11 PM
To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Question about Cisco 1810w APs in residential
buildings
lt;mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Question about Cisco 1810w APs in residential
buildings
8.2.120.11 is the minimum version I would recommend. 1810 (in my opinion) came
out of the factory not completely baked.
We bought the first batch of 181
Ian,
What issues are you having with the wired ports? Are you testing 802.1x on the
wired ports? We are specifically interested in how it handles flexauth and
multi-authentication.
> On Oct 25, 2016, at 10:08 AM, Ian Lyons wrote:
>
> 8.2.120.11 is the minimum version I
17 matches
Mail list logo