Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues

I spent 4 weeks back and forth arguing with Valemont on their forums about my issues with VPN and their change of how they handle hotspots and speed control. At that time all I had was StarOS v2 Wrap boards and loved them but they wouldn't handle XR2's and the Wrap boards being end of life we deci

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues

It is on v 3.15 there is no unusual disassociation. The issue is very intermittent and lasts anywhere from 10 seconds to 2 min. These 2 clients are now to the place that they keep a small ping going to my DNS when the pings go out they just wait until they come back. (sad) good thing they are pat

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues

Steve, You may have already stated this, but what is the RSSI reported in the TRCPQ19? What is the SNR reported at the AP in the MT box? If you are running a XR2 in the MT AP and have a CPQ19 as a CPE and do not have a signal level being reported of at least a -84/-83 in the CPQ - - you may see

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues

MT AP side -71 11mb/11mb CCQ=96% Sig to noise=29dB. Tranzeo -70 Noise -102 11Mb Steve Barnes RCWiFi Wireless Internet Service -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mac Dearman Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 9:03 AM To: 'WISPA General List'

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues

When you log into the AP that is giving you trouble - - choose wireless tab on left and then double click the radio - run "scan" and see if its interference with something else on that channel. Tried changing channels?? Mac > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL P

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues

Note that when you do a scan the AP will disassociate with ALL of your clients... Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly. --- Henry Spencer On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 9:54 A

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues

I have scanned from the AP 2422 is the only open channel. Here is info from the scan. 2462-35 2447-76 2437-77 2447-77 2462-80 2437-81 2412-82 2442-82 I know overlap will can kill me but I feel with spacing 2422 is the best there was a total of 29 APs found all the

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues

Steve, 2442 overlaps both channels 6 (2437) and 11 (2462) IMHO - you would be better off by staying with non overlapping channels such as 2412/2437/2462 and deal with the noise by utilizing Horizontal polarities. Between the noise from others and the overlapping of channels by yourself - - I

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues

29 ap's? roflol Dude, in a 45* sector I can pick up 99 last time I looked. The -35 looks like it would probably be one of yours I've had to set some of my ap's to ignore everything below -85 or so. That sure cuts back on the range to some people these days. Gonna really suck when that h

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues

Heh, I am in an area like Marlon's (a little wetter to be sure). Sometimes I crash CPE when I put them into scanning mode there are so many APs around here! ryan Marlon K. Schafer wrote: > 29 ap's? roflol > > Dude, in a 45* sector I can pick up 99 last time I looked. > > The -35 looks like it

Re: [WISPA] any got this Tranzeo antenna in stock?

Isn't it just a rebadged pac wireless unit? -Original Message- From: Kurt Fankhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 3:17 PM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: [WISPA] any got this Tranzeo antenna in stock? Looking for Qty 3x Tranzeo TR-24H-120-13. Units are on 4 week

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues

I always try to stay on non-overlapping channels. Fortunatly, I am in the boondocks and 2.4GHz is mostly clear. I've got a few AP's that will only perform well on channel 8. Any ideas? -RickG On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Mac Dearman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Steve, > > > 2442 overlaps bo

Re: [WISPA] any got this Tranzeo antenna in stock?

Isn't it just a rebadged pac wireless unit? -Original Message- From: Kurt Fankhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 3:17 PM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: [WISPA] any got this Tranzeo antenna in stock? Looking for Qty 3x Tranzeo TR-24H-120-13. Units are on 4 week

Re: [WISPA] any got this Tranzeo antenna in stock?

Isn't it just a rebadged pac wireless unit? -Original Message- From: Kurt Fankhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 3:17 PM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: [WISPA] any got this Tranzeo antenna in stock? Looking for Qty 3x Tranzeo TR-24H-120-13. Units are on 4 week

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues

Is is funny how the really intelligent technical people have no idea on how to run a business. Scottie -- Original Message -- From: "Steve Barnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: WISPA General List Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 08:14:36 -0500 That and Lonnie is

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues

I'm replacing my single x86 board with 4x 411AHs... Single board per radio from now on (other than low impact repeaters, internal wifi, etc.). The extra 2 Ethernet and mPCI are unnecessary. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ---

Re: [WISPA] IBM backs BPL

yeah, BPL is no good. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com -- From: "RickG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 10:10 PM To: "WISPA General List" Subject: Re: [WISPA] IBM backs BPL > When I

[WISPA] Vista VPN Question

Is there a way to setup Vista so that only certain subnets are routed over a VPN link? It seems silly that a customer with a 16 meg Comcast connection pushes all Internet traffic through the office's 2/2 connection. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com -

Re: [WISPA] Vista VPN Question

Mike Hammett wrote: > Is there a way to setup Vista so that only certain subnets are routed over a > VPN link? It seems silly that a customer with a 16 meg Comcast connection > pushes all Internet traffic through the office's 2/2 connection. > There is a route command you can use from the co

Re: [WISPA] Vista VPN Question

What type of VPN are you using? Some allow publishing or advertising of routes to the client when the VPN is established On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 10:59 -0800, Charles Wyble wrote: > Mike Hammett wrote: > > Is there a way to setup Vista so that only certain subnets are routed over > > a VPN link? I

[WISPA] Off Topic - IBM Exp700

Hey guys, If there's anyone out there that's familiar with an IBM TotalStorage EXP700 I could use some help. Would appreciate some info offlist if you don't mind. Thanks! WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://si

Re: [WISPA] IBM backs BPL

Just like everything else There is a useful place for anything, somewhere. BPL is in no way a solution to solve the world's broadband problems. But it is clearly part of the solution, just like Wireless, DSL, or FTTH. Some of the case studies here in Potomac Maryland were very successful, an

Re: [WISPA] IBM backs BPL

Is there and BPL solutions out there that WISPs could take advantage of yet? Maybe beam in some high speed and then go to the community or subdivision? -- * Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer WISPA Board Member - wispa.org Li

Re: [WISPA] IBM backs BPL

Canopy has a BPL just for that. http://www.motorola.com/Business/US-EN/Business+Product+and+Services/Wireles s+Broadband+Networks/Broadband+over+Powerline / Eje CTO WISP-Router, Inc. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dennis Burgess - Link

Re: [WISPA] IBM backs BPL

Now, now, now. I had a blast with the BPL projects. There is no feeling like simply adding a piece of equipment to an electric substation and instantly lighting up a neighborhood with broadband. -RickG On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 1:47 PM, Mike Hammett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > yeah, BPL is no good.

Re: [WISPA] IBM backs BPL

I agree. Too bad it was given much of a chance to mature. -RickG On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Tom DeReggi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just like everything else There is a useful place for anything, > somewhere. > > BPL is in no way a solution to solve the world's broadband problems. But i

Re: [WISPA] IBM backs BPL

That would work behind the same distribution panel but to get a subdivision you need access to the substation and equipment made to go through transformers. That would also require cooperation with the local electric provider. My favorite product was http://powerline-plc.com/ -RickG On Thu, Nov 1

[WISPA] Nanostation5

I've enjoyed the Nanostation2's so much, I decided to try out a 5GHz unit. For some reason, It wont connect to my WRAP running StarOS with a CM9 card. Any ideas? -RickG WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wisp

Re: [WISPA] Nanostation5

RickG wrote: > I've enjoyed the Nanostation2's so much, I decided to try out a 5GHz > unit. For some reason, It wont connect to my WRAP running StarOS with > a CM9 card. Any ideas? Is the Nanostation set to a channel that your card supports? (If you think yes, are you SURE?) ---

Re: [WISPA] Nanostation5

I have no problems with the X4000 APs running V3. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless RickG wrote: > I've enjoyed the Nanostation2's so much, I decided to try out a 5GHz > unit. For some reason, It wont connect to my WRAP running StarOS with > a CM9 card. Any ideas? > -RickG > > > ---

Re: [WISPA] Vista VPN Question

The VPN server is a Mikrotik box, the local DHCP could be anything... it's a laptop. I'll research the route command. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com -- From: "Charles Wyble" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: T

Re: [WISPA] Vista VPN Question

PPTP VPN connection. I'll see what is supported in this regard. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com -- From: "Matt Hardy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 1:48 PM To: "WISPA General List"