I agree. Also the Wiki says that 20 MHz is default.
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Greg Ihnen
Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2012 12:17 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti PicoStation M
That and AirMax got me more than once. I
Does anyone know of have a management contact at Airband in Dallas, Texas?
http://www.wispa.org/where-there-is-a-wisp-there-is-a-way Where there is
a Wisp, there is a way!
Respectfully,
Rick Harnish
Executive Director
WISPA
260-307-4000 cell
866-317-2851 Option 2 WISPA Office
here is a link to there LinkedIn page you might get the contact you need
that way.
http://www.linkedin.com/company/15499?goback=%2Efcs_GLHD_AirBand_false_*2_*2_*2_*2_*2_*2_*2_*2_*2_*2_*2_*2trk=ncsrch_hits
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Rick Harnish rharn...@wispa.org wrote:
Does anyone know
If you are looking for commercial bandwidth in Dallas, you might also try
Belwave. They are a Wispa member.
Cameron
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:25 AM, timothy steele timothy.pct...@gmail.comwrote:
here is a link to there LinkedIn page you might get the contact you need
that way.
Yeah, that would be a good carrot to get people to submit. How cool would
it be to be able to let the consumer self qualify themselves (at least an
educated guess) for your service?
That's a similar step that Wa. is working on now. Sandborn is working with
Radio Mobile to help figure out
For the purposes of these maps it doesn't really have to be that exact. Close,
yes. But exactness isn't needed.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Cameron Crum
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 10:07 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] What you can do!
Accurate
Right.
And that's why we still have to fight they current rules as proposed.
We've made the statement that if any company offers un subsidized service
then no one should get a tax payer funded leg up in the market.
Under the current rules a SINGLE company has to provide both *facilities
based
Our vendor told us that if we purchase the higher watt power adapter that we
can use the same power adapter for both our Nanostation and our Pico. Is
there a setting in the Nano we need to turn on for the second POE for the
Pico?
___
Wireless mailing
Facilities Based excludes all fixed wireless, is that correct?
Would VoIP - properly reported, taxed, etc. - qualify as voice?
Randy
On 5/29/2012 10:40 AM, Marlon K. Schafer (509-982-2181) wrote:
Right.
And that's why we still have to fight they current rules as proposed.
We've made the
At 5/29/2012 12:40 PM, MarlonS wrote:
Right.
And that's why we still have to fight they current rules as proposed.
Trouble is, that rule already passed. CAF now will subsidize broadband.
We've made the statement that if any company offers un subsidized service
then no one should get a tax
As it was explained on the list a few days ago by Stephen Coran, the
CAF rules do not include a definition or Facilities Based. If you use
the definition as listed in the Form 477 instructions, most WISPs
would qualify as facilities based.
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Randy Cosby
At 5/29/2012 01:05 PM, Randy Cosby wrote:
Facilities Based excludes all fixed wireless, is that correct?
No. The unsubsidized competitor rule includes fixed wireless.
Would VoIP - properly reported, taxed, etc. - qualify as voice?
Yes. It has to meet reasonable quality standards, provide E911
In fact, WISPA has already gone
on record AGAINST the current rule that a single company has to
provide both voice and data. WISPA asked the FCC to change the
rule so that CAF subsidies would be denied in "an area subject
to unsubsidized competition".
you have to enable POE Pass through in the GUI of the NSM
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Carl Shivers cshiv...@aristotle.netwrote:
Our vendor told us that if we purchase the higher watt power adapter that
we can use the same power adapter for both our Nanostation and our Pico. Is
there a
Is this on the advanced tab? Also, I was reading where people enabled this
and then their radio was bricked??
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of timothy steele
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2012 1:14 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Power
A good thing to know about the UBNT gear is if for some reason supplying PoE
via the main port stops working, you can supply PoE via the secondary port
whether or not the PoE passthrough option is enabled.
Greg
On May 29, 2012, at 5:09 PM, Carl Shivers wrote:
Is this on the advanced tab?
As a previous poster mentioned, this feature on Nanostation M5 and M2 is
called POE passthrough, and it has a checkbox to enable it on the AirOS web
UI.
This will let you power a 2nd 24V POE device from the Secondary port of
the Nanostation, using a single POE supply. I use the POE-24-1 (aka 24V
17 matches
Mail list logo
