Re: [WISPA] WISPA Show Interests was: WISPCon

2005-09-28 Thread John Scrivner
Actually I did not speak out of turn. I stand by my original post in all details unless you have alternate information. I am not trying to start an argument here but I think I spoke 100% the truth in my last post. I welcome proof to the contrary but I did not use speculation in my post. I

Re: [WISPA] WISPA Show Interests was: WISPCon

2005-09-28 Thread Butch Evans
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote: or dislike one or the other fine. There are more important things to talk about on this list though. Does this mean I should hold my toungue (fingers, as it were) regarding Part 15? :-) -- Butch Evans BPS Networks

RE: [WISPA] WISPA Show Interests was: WISPCon

2005-09-28 Thread Charles Wu
Last I understood, Part-15 was also a Non-Profit. That's the sham Although .org domain names are traditionally reserved for non-profit institutions, there is nothing within ICANN policy preventing a for-profit organization from registering a .org domain A quick who-is of Part-15.org

RE: [WISPA] WISPA Show Interests was: WISPCon

2005-09-28 Thread Charles Wu
snip It should be noted that of all organizations mentioned above that WISPA is the only one that is federally recognized under CFR # 501c6 as a non-profit trade association.. Every other entity listed above is working to make a profit in their efforts and as such would likely be looking to

Re: [WISPA] WISPA Show Interests was: WISPCon

2005-09-28 Thread Tom DeReggi
- Original Message - From: John Scrivner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 6:06 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] WISPA Show Interests was: WISPCon Actually I did not speak out of turn. I stand by my original post in all details unless

Re: [WISPA] WISPA Show Interests was: WISPCon

2005-09-28 Thread Bob Moldashel
Charles Wu wrote: snip All I really meant is WISPA is a GROUP for WISPS operated by WISPs. I'm a strong supporter and member of WISPA. Part-15 is a group for WISPs by an individual. I'm not sure what doesn't make sense about that, thats the way I see it. Nothing wrong with either model,