RE: [WISPA] recommendation forClient POE integrated radiofor 802.11b/g

2006-12-29 Thread JohnnyO


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jack Unger
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 6:09 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] recommendation forClient POE integrated radiofor
802.11b/g



Matt Liotta wrote:

 Jack Unger wrote:
 
 OK, I'll forgive the analogy but, in a real emergency, you have to do

 what needs to be done.

 Actually, in an emergency a public safety organization should make use

 of their emergency communication plan, which really shouldn't rely on 
 unlicensed spectrum, a consumer access point, and a best effort
internet 
 connection.
 
 -Matt
 

Probably 90% of public safety organizations' Emergency Communications 
Plans have made use of ham radio operators for years and continue to 
make use of hams today. A police officer isn't a communications expert 
which is why many police departments and County Offices of Emergency 
Services fund and support communications teams and vans manned by 
trained hams, who are communications experts. The use of unlicensed 
spectrum is becoming more and more the norm. To consider the use of a 
consumer access point not as the primary means of communication but as 
one of the many backup communications options is simply being realistic 
and practical.

jack

*Jack - someone mentioned in an earlier post something regarding the
difference between a consultant that tells you the rules or knows the
rules and one that don't. Are you a consultant ? and if so - are you
saying that using illegal means to gain internet access is OK ?

JohnnyO

-- 
Jack Unger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
Serving the License-Free Wireless Industry Since 1993
Author of the WISP Handbook - Deploying License-Free Wireless WANs
True Vendor-Neutral WISP Consulting-Training-Troubleshooting
Newsletters Downloadable from http://ask-wi.com/newsletters.html
Phone (VoIP Over Broadband Wireless) 818-227-4220  www.ask-wi.com



-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.15.29/608 - Release Date:
12/29/2006 8:22 AM


-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] recommendation forClient POE integrated radiofor 802.11b/g

2006-12-29 Thread Jack Unger

JohnnyO,

Please see my answers to your questions inline at the bottom of this email.

Thanks,
jack


JohnnyO wrote:



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jack Unger
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 6:09 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] recommendation forClient POE integrated radiofor
802.11b/g



Matt Liotta wrote:



Jack Unger wrote:



OK, I'll forgive the analogy but, in a real emergency, you have to do




what needs to be done.



Actually, in an emergency a public safety organization should make use



of their emergency communication plan, which really shouldn't rely on 
unlicensed spectrum, a consumer access point, and a best effort


internet 


connection.

-Matt




Probably 90% of public safety organizations' Emergency Communications 
Plans have made use of ham radio operators for years and continue to 
make use of hams today. A police officer isn't a communications expert 
which is why many police departments and County Offices of Emergency 
Services fund and support communications teams and vans manned by 
trained hams, who are communications experts. The use of unlicensed 
spectrum is becoming more and more the norm. To consider the use of a 
consumer access point not as the primary means of communication but as 
one of the many backup communications options is simply being realistic 
and practical.


jack

*Jack - someone mentioned in an earlier post something regarding the
difference between a consultant that tells you the rules or knows the
rules and one that don't. Are you a consultant ? and if so - are you
saying that using illegal means to gain internet access is OK ?

JohnnyO



Answers:

1. Yes, I am a WISP consultant, a wireless network designer, a WISP 
trainer, an in-the-field WISP troubleshooter, a WISP business advisor, a 
WISP author, a WISP auditor, and a former WISP owner. I've served over 
1500 wireless companies and organizations and trained over 2000 WISP 
personnel since I started my business in 1993. I continue to travel 
across the U.S. and Canada serving WISPs, colleges, cities, and my 
newest client which is the County Art Museum located in the second 
largest city in the U.S. Because of the magic of wireless, the variety 
of different challenges that I encounter and the good will and sincerity 
of the clients that I work for, I still love this work as I start my 
14th year serving the broadband wireless community.


2. No, I am not saying that using illegal means to gain Internet access 
is OK. You are putting words into my mouth and I'm not going to let you 
get away with that. I said that in an emergency, accessing an available 
open access point to provide communications for emergency personnel is 
OK. If you doubt that, I invite you to run it by the FCC for their opinion.


Have a Happy New Year,

jack


--
Jack Unger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
Serving the License-Free Wireless Industry Since 1993
Author of the WISP Handbook - Deploying License-Free Wireless WANs
True Vendor-Neutral WISP Consulting-Training-Troubleshooting
Newsletters Downloadable from http://ask-wi.com/newsletters.html
Phone (VoIP Over Broadband Wireless) 818-227-4220  www.ask-wi.com



--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] recommendation forClient POE integrated radiofor 802.11b/g

2006-12-29 Thread JohnnyO
*** Jack Wrote .

---2. No, I am not saying that using illegal means to gain Internet
access 
is OK. You are putting words into my mouth and I'm not going to let you 
get away with that. I said that in an emergency, accessing an available 
open access point to provide communications for emergency personnel is 
OK. If you doubt that, I invite you to run it by the FCC for their
opinion.

Jack - would you mind asking an FCC Official if this is legal or illegal
? I certainly hope that a ham operator can't break laws in order to
steal an internet connection from an UNKNOWING person or business... The
idea of them using someone's internet connection WITH permission during
an emergency is COMPLETELY different then them just loggin on at will to
an OPEN access point. It's illegal if they don't have permission.

JohnnyO

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jack Unger
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 7:21 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] recommendation forClient POE integrated radiofor
802.11b/g

JohnnyO,

Please see my answers to your questions inline at the bottom of this
email.

Thanks,
 jack


JohnnyO wrote:

 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
 Behalf Of Jack Unger
 Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 6:09 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: Re: [WISPA] recommendation forClient POE integrated radiofor
 802.11b/g
 
 
 
 Matt Liotta wrote:
 
 
Jack Unger wrote:


OK, I'll forgive the analogy but, in a real emergency, you have to do
 
 
what needs to be done.


Actually, in an emergency a public safety organization should make use
 
 
of their emergency communication plan, which really shouldn't rely on 
unlicensed spectrum, a consumer access point, and a best effort
 
 internet 
 
connection.

-Matt

 
 
 Probably 90% of public safety organizations' Emergency Communications 
 Plans have made use of ham radio operators for years and continue to 
 make use of hams today. A police officer isn't a communications expert

 which is why many police departments and County Offices of Emergency 
 Services fund and support communications teams and vans manned by 
 trained hams, who are communications experts. The use of unlicensed 
 spectrum is becoming more and more the norm. To consider the use of a 
 consumer access point not as the primary means of communication but as

 one of the many backup communications options is simply being
realistic 
 and practical.
 
 jack
 
 *Jack - someone mentioned in an earlier post something regarding
the
 difference between a consultant that tells you the rules or knows the
 rules and one that don't. Are you a consultant ? and if so - are you
 saying that using illegal means to gain internet access is OK ?
 
 JohnnyO
 

Answers:

1. Yes, I am a WISP consultant, a wireless network designer, a WISP 
trainer, an in-the-field WISP troubleshooter, a WISP business advisor, a

WISP author, a WISP auditor, and a former WISP owner. I've served over 
1500 wireless companies and organizations and trained over 2000 WISP 
personnel since I started my business in 1993. I continue to travel 
across the U.S. and Canada serving WISPs, colleges, cities, and my 
newest client which is the County Art Museum located in the second 
largest city in the U.S. Because of the magic of wireless, the variety

of different challenges that I encounter and the good will and sincerity

of the clients that I work for, I still love this work as I start my 
14th year serving the broadband wireless community.

2. No, I am not saying that using illegal means to gain Internet access 
is OK. You are putting words into my mouth and I'm not going to let you 
get away with that. I said that in an emergency, accessing an available 
open access point to provide communications for emergency personnel is 
OK. If you doubt that, I invite you to run it by the FCC for their
opinion.

Have a Happy New Year,

jack


-- 
Jack Unger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
Serving the License-Free Wireless Industry Since 1993
Author of the WISP Handbook - Deploying License-Free Wireless WANs
True Vendor-Neutral WISP Consulting-Training-Troubleshooting
Newsletters Downloadable from http://ask-wi.com/newsletters.html
Phone (VoIP Over Broadband Wireless) 818-227-4220  www.ask-wi.com



-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.15.29/608 - Release Date:
12/29/2006 8:22 AM


-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] recommendation forClient POE integrated radiofor 802.11b/g

2006-12-29 Thread George Rogato
Johnny, you are probably right. There was a guy who was arrested 
recently sitting in his car in front of someones house and we all 
discussed it and there was 2 opinions:

1- If it aint secured, it's open and it 'should' be ok.
2- if you don't have permission your stealing regardless of it being 
an unsecured ap.


So there ya go, your probably right, but I bet you'd have an awfully 
hard time getting anyone to listen in the event of an emergency.. I 
doubt a cop is going to arrest anyone.


So whats the point?

George

JohnnyO wrote:

*** Jack Wrote .

---2. No, I am not saying that using illegal means to gain Internet
access 
is OK. You are putting words into my mouth and I'm not going to let you 
get away with that. I said that in an emergency, accessing an available 
open access point to provide communications for emergency personnel is 
OK. If you doubt that, I invite you to run it by the FCC for their

opinion.

Jack - would you mind asking an FCC Official if this is legal or illegal
? I certainly hope that a ham operator can't break laws in order to
steal an internet connection from an UNKNOWING person or business... The
idea of them using someone's internet connection WITH permission during
an emergency is COMPLETELY different then them just loggin on at will to
an OPEN access point. It's illegal if they don't have permission.

JohnnyO

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jack Unger
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 7:21 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] recommendation forClient POE integrated radiofor
802.11b/g

JohnnyO,

Please see my answers to your questions inline at the bottom of this
email.

Thanks,
 jack


JohnnyO wrote:


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

On

Behalf Of Jack Unger
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 6:09 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] recommendation forClient POE integrated radiofor
802.11b/g



Matt Liotta wrote:



Jack Unger wrote:



OK, I'll forgive the analogy but, in a real emergency, you have to do



what needs to be done.


Actually, in an emergency a public safety organization should make use


of their emergency communication plan, which really shouldn't rely on 
unlicensed spectrum, a consumer access point, and a best effort
internet 


connection.

-Matt



Probably 90% of public safety organizations' Emergency Communications 
Plans have made use of ham radio operators for years and continue to 
make use of hams today. A police officer isn't a communications expert


which is why many police departments and County Offices of Emergency 
Services fund and support communications teams and vans manned by 
trained hams, who are communications experts. The use of unlicensed 
spectrum is becoming more and more the norm. To consider the use of a 
consumer access point not as the primary means of communication but as



one of the many backup communications options is simply being
realistic 

and practical.

jack

*Jack - someone mentioned in an earlier post something regarding

the

difference between a consultant that tells you the rules or knows the
rules and one that don't. Are you a consultant ? and if so - are you
saying that using illegal means to gain internet access is OK ?

JohnnyO



Answers:

1. Yes, I am a WISP consultant, a wireless network designer, a WISP 
trainer, an in-the-field WISP troubleshooter, a WISP business advisor, a


WISP author, a WISP auditor, and a former WISP owner. I've served over 
1500 wireless companies and organizations and trained over 2000 WISP 
personnel since I started my business in 1993. I continue to travel 
across the U.S. and Canada serving WISPs, colleges, cities, and my 
newest client which is the County Art Museum located in the second 
largest city in the U.S. Because of the magic of wireless, the variety


of different challenges that I encounter and the good will and sincerity

of the clients that I work for, I still love this work as I start my 
14th year serving the broadband wireless community.


2. No, I am not saying that using illegal means to gain Internet access 
is OK. You are putting words into my mouth and I'm not going to let you 
get away with that. I said that in an emergency, accessing an available 
open access point to provide communications for emergency personnel is 
OK. If you doubt that, I invite you to run it by the FCC for their

opinion.

Have a Happy New Year,

jack




--
George Rogato

Welcome to WISPA

www.wispa.org

http://signup.wispa.org/
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/