[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Ron WallaceSent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 9:23
PMTo: WISPA General ListSubject: Re: [WISPA] 2.4GHz vs
5GHz>-Original Message->From:
Charles Wu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2006
0
you are right it is not 'scatter' it called dispersion and diffraction, Mr. Wu.>-Original Message->From: Charles Wu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2006 04:41 PM>To: ''WISPA General List''>Subject: RE: [WISPA] 2.4GHz vs 5G
900MHz isn't available here in the UK :(
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Charles Wu
Sent: 04 January 2006 21:41
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] 2.4GHz vs 5GHz
Trees are sponges -- there is no "scatter&q
Trees are sponges -- there is no "scatter" with them
That said, you're are causing yourself undue headache trying to do NLoS with
2.4 -- especially when 900 MHz is readily available
-Charles
---
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
-Ori
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 11:00 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 2.4GHz vs 5GHz
Brad,
Could you tell us more about what infrastructure is required to support
the 2400 subscriber system you are referring to? How many tower
locations, sectors per tower, b
ustin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brad Larson
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 11:03 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] 2.4GHz vs 5GHz
Dustin, Typically 50 feet above the tree line for this customer gets their 1
03, 2006 10:34 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] 2.4GHz vs 5GHz
Not all OFDM radios are created equally (especially PTMP). In many areas of
NorthEast USA we have 1 mile radius's with eave mounted BreezeAccess VL
Subscribers (5.8 Ghz) doing mod 6 which reflects a 10 meg
this model. I have 2,400 subscribers
(and growing) deployed in this fashion with one customer. Brad
-Original Message-
From: Blair Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 9:37 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 2.4GHz vs 5GHz
My practical tests show
t'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] 2.4GHz vs 5GHz
Not all OFDM radios are created equally (especially PTMP). In many areas of
NorthEast USA we have 1 mile radius's with eave mounted BreezeAccess VL
Subscribers (5.8 Ghz) doing mod 6 which reflects a 10 meg true data rate.
Typically these are o
esday, January 03, 2006 9:37 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 2.4GHz vs 5GHz
My practical tests show that 2.4GHz works better in a rural Near LosS
environment. This is using 802.11b/g vs 802.11a.
I have had no luck with 5.3/5.8GHz in a rural Near/Non LoS
environment. On the other
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 9:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 2.4GHz vs 5GHz
We have a 5.8Ghz link where the antenna is directly behind concrete that
works
, because
Christ was born to provide salvation to all who will
believe!
-- Original Message
---
From: Matt Liotta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], WISPA General List
Sent: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 10:07:47 -0500
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 2.4GHz vs 5GHz
> We have
Behalf Of Paul Hendry
Sent: 03 January 2006 11:48
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] 2.4GHz vs 5GHz
I thought that was it but needed someone to clarify ;) What about 5GHz
penetrating walls much better than 2.4GHz?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
for
tree NLOS environments than 5GHz?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Hendry
Sent: 03 January 2006 11:48
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] 2.4GHz vs 5GHz
I thought that was it but needed someone to clarify ;) What
tree NLOS environments than 5GHz?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Hendry
Sent: 03 January 2006 11:48
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA] 2.4GHz vs 5GHz
I thought that was it but needed someone to clarify ;) What
I thought that was it but needed someone to clarify ;) What about 5GHz
penetrating walls much better than 2.4GHz?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mike Delp
Sent: 03 January 2006 11:44
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: RE: [WISPA]
Paul,
5 GHz works NLOS in an urban environment. Bouncing around buildings, etc.
Look at the success of Redline and Orthogon. OFDM and 5 GHz works well for
them. An environment with trees is different. Trees absorb the signals,
instead of bouncing them. Especially wet trees!
We utilize 2.4
17 matches
Mail list logo
