Re: [WISPA] Airports a Problem?

2009-09-30 Thread Bret Clark
We shoot across an airport (the big ones as well) with a bunch of 5.8 stuff, but I believe we needed to get clearance from the airport and maybe the FAA before installing. Otherwise we've had zero problems with interference from their systems. I would start by calling or gong to see the person

Re: [WISPA] Airports a Problem?

2009-09-30 Thread lakeland
General Listwireless@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA] Airports a Problem? We shoot across an airport (the big ones as well) with a bunch of 5.8 stuff, but I believe we needed to get clearance from the airport and maybe the FAA before installing. Otherwise we've had zero problems with interference

Re: [WISPA] Airports a Problem?

2009-09-30 Thread lakeland
for a WISP system. :-) Bob Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -Original Message- From: Bret Clark bcl...@spectraaccess.com Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:54:22 To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA] Airports a Problem? I somewhat disagree, in terms of the signal

Re: [WISPA] Airports a Problem?

2009-09-30 Thread Robert West
there. -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Bret Clark Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 8:54 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Airports a Problem? I somewhat disagree, in terms of the signal, no you don't need

Re: [WISPA] Airports a Problem?

2009-09-30 Thread 3-dB Networks
...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Robert West Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 7:23 AM To: bcl...@spectraaccess.com; 'WISPA General List' Subject: Re: [WISPA] Airports a Problem? This path I'm considering is 33 miles in length and the airport is 11 miles from the closest

Re: [WISPA] Airports a Problem?

2009-09-30 Thread lakeland
Message- From: Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.com Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:22:40 To: bcl...@spectraaccess.com; 'WISPA General List'wireless@wispa.org Subject: Re: [WISPA] Airports a Problem? This path I'm considering is 33 miles in length and the airport is 11 miles from the closest tower

Re: [WISPA] Airports a Problem?

2009-09-30 Thread Robert West
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of 3-dB Networks Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 9:35 AM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: Re: [WISPA] Airports a Problem? Unless the base of the runway is in the Fresnel zone... an airplane flying through it is only going to cause a minor

Re: [WISPA] Airports a Problem?

2009-09-30 Thread Robert West
...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of lakel...@gbcx.net Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 9:41 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Airports a Problem? Won't be a problem. Planes will not cause you an issue unless they fly into the tower. I have a link accross a runway at 5Ghz and jets pass through the path

Re: [WISPA] Airports a Problem?

2009-09-30 Thread Mike
Agreed. Planes flying through the Fresnel zone will have more of an impact on B type modulation than on say G. You might see selective fading because of multipath, but OFDM or some other robust modulation technique will recover from an aircraft on approach at 250 mph flying through the

Re: [WISPA] Airports a Problem?

2009-09-30 Thread Josh Luthman
I have a 5.8 link over an airport and a 900ap next door to the airport. No problems. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however improbable, must be the truth. --- Sir Arthur

Re: [WISPA] Airports a Problem?

2009-09-30 Thread equip sourcing dept
30, 2009 8:54 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Airports a Problem? I somewhat disagree, in terms of the signal, no you don't need approval, but to put a wireless network up with antenna's near any airport the height of the antenna is governed by the FAA, you need