Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues

2008-11-13 Thread Mike Hammett
l.com -- From: "Josh Luthman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 2:48 PM To: "WISPA General List" Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues > When I read "However, pings from the client to my office will drop for an > inte

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues

2008-11-13 Thread Scottie Arnett
That and Lonnie is a jerk. > >Steve Barnes >RCWiFi Wireless Internet Service > >-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >Behalf Of Matt Larsen - Lists >Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 7:57 PM >To: WISPA General List >Subject:

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues

2008-11-13 Thread RickG
- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >> Behalf Of Steve Barnes >> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 9:23 AM >> To: WISPA General List >> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues >> >> I have scanned from the AP 2422 is the only open channel. Here

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues

2008-11-13 Thread D. Ryan Spott
> - Original Message - > From: "Steve Barnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "WISPA General List" > Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 7:23 AM > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues > > > >> I have scanned from the AP 2422 is the only open c

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues

2008-11-13 Thread Marlon K. Schafer
suck when that hits -80 or even -75. marlon - Original Message - From: "Steve Barnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 7:23 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues >I have scanned from the AP 2422 is the onl

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues

2008-11-13 Thread Mac Dearman
nt: Thursday, November 13, 2008 9:23 AM > To: WISPA General List > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues > > I have scanned from the AP 2422 is the only open channel. Here is info > from the scan. > > 2462 -35 > 2447 -76 > 2437 -77 > 2447 -77 > 2462 -80 &g

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues

2008-11-13 Thread Steve Barnes
rest were -86 or more(less). Steve Barnes RCWiFi Wireless Internet Service -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 9:57 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues Note that when

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues

2008-11-13 Thread Josh Luthman
ed changing channels?? > > Mac > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > Behalf Of Steve Barnes > > Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 8:30 AM > > To: WISPA General List > > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues > &

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues

2008-11-13 Thread Mac Dearman
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Steve Barnes > Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 8:30 AM > To: WISPA General List > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues > > MT AP side -71 11mb/11mb CCQ=96% Sig to noise=29dB. Tranzeo -70 Noise > -102 11Mb > > Stev

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues

2008-11-13 Thread Steve Barnes
List' Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues Steve, You may have already stated this, but what is the RSSI reported in the TRCPQ19? What is the SNR reported at the AP in the MT box? If you are running a XR2 in the MT AP and have a CPQ19 as a CPE and do not have a signal level being reported o

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues

2008-11-13 Thread Mac Dearman
7:27 AM > To: WISPA General List > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues > > It is on v 3.15 there is no unusual disassociation. The issue is very > intermittent and lasts anywhere from 10 seconds to 2 min. These 2 > clients are now to the place that they keep a small ping going t

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues

2008-11-13 Thread Steve Barnes
patient. I am not mangling the packets I any way it is a straight through Masqueraded Nat. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Butch Evans Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 6:55 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues

2008-11-13 Thread Steve Barnes
EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Larsen - Lists Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 7:57 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues I'm curious to hear why the client's VPN wouldn't work. I haven't had any problem with clie

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues

2008-11-12 Thread Matt Larsen - Lists
November 12, 2008 3:36 PM > To: WISPA General List > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues > > You may want to look at the status tab of the associated clients on the > AP. > See if there are lost packets or a lot of retransmissions. > > Did you really use a RB411 or did you

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues

2008-11-12 Thread Butch Evans
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Steve Barnes wrote: >In reply to the RB411. We changed from a StarOS WAR board that >would not work for our clients VPN and the company that put up my >towers replaced them with a RB411. I was the Guinea Pig for their >Mikrotik AP setup. I am a Tranzeo Guy and know littl

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues

2008-11-12 Thread Butch Evans
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Steve Barnes wrote: > I have a odd issue(as always). If you are running a RouterOS version <3.15, try upgrading. That has fixed similar situations. If you are able to watch the tower, when this happens, look at the log to see if clients are disconnecting en masse and the

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues

2008-11-12 Thread Cameron Kilton
neral List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues Short answer - rb411a is a good pick. Dennis brought a really good fact to my attention. The rb411a and rb433 have the same CPU memory (though lacks both 2 minipci slots and 2 NICs, but this is an AP after all). On the vendors websites I browsed q

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues

2008-11-12 Thread Josh Luthman
Short answer - rb411a is a good pick. Dennis brought a really good fact to my attention. The rb411a and rb433 have the same CPU memory (though lacks both 2 minipci slots and 2 NICs, but this is an AP after all). On the vendors websites I browsed quickly the rb411a is often a good $20 cheaper. H

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues

2008-11-12 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
I do prefer the 433AHs, however if you are only putting a single radio card on it, then the 411A vs 433 is wash. Same processor, same RAM as the 433. If you are not doing much with it, it should work fine. Going to multiple radios per board, 433AH, is the way to go though.

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues

2008-11-12 Thread Josh Luthman
ameron Kilton > Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 3:48 PM > To: 'WISPA General List' > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues > > Yeah, but he said he was plugged directly to the jbox so the router > issue should be out of the mix. > > Can you ping the AP from the CPE wh

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues

2008-11-12 Thread Steve Barnes
WISPA General List' Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues Yeah, but he said he was plugged directly to the jbox so the router issue should be out of the mix. Can you ping the AP from the CPE when this dropout happens? How is the CCQ on the effected clients? Is it possible to turn down the

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues

2008-11-12 Thread Josh Luthman
When I read "However, pings from the client to my office will drop for an intermittent time period several times an hour." I believe he was referring from the CPE radio to his office PC/core. RB411 is meant for a CPE device. RB433 is meant for an AP. If your customers are happy and paying their

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues

2008-11-12 Thread Cameron Kilton
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sam Tetherow Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 3:46 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues What is the client radio? What does the networking look like. My first guess would be a crappy

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues

2008-11-12 Thread Steve Barnes
General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues You may want to look at the status tab of the associated clients on the AP. See if there are lost packets or a lot of retransmissions. Did you really use a RB411 or did you mean another model for the AP? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues

2008-11-12 Thread Sam Tetherow
What is the client radio? What does the networking look like. My first guess would be a crappy customer side router which is either having issues with an ARP table or connection table filling up. Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Steve Barnes wrote: > I have a odd issue(as always). > > First of

Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues

2008-11-12 Thread Josh Luthman
You may want to look at the status tab of the associated clients on the AP. See if there are lost packets or a lot of retransmissions. Did you really use a RB411 or did you mean another model for the AP? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 4537