Title: signature
Haven't seen any documents from NTIA or anyone else.
Martha
Huizenga
DC
Access, LLC
202-546-5898
Friendly,
Local,
Affordable, Internet!
Connecting the
Ca
e wireless broadband
with...
Kurt Fankhauser
WAVELINC
P.O. Box 126
Bucyrus, OH 44820
419-562-6405
www.wavelinc.com
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Brian Webster
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 9:05 AM
To: WISPA General
Here are some web sites to check out:
Connected Nation Projects:
http://www.connectky.com/
http://connectohio.org/
http://www.connectmn.org/mapping/
http://www.connectedtn.org/broadband_landscape/
http://connectwestvirginia.org/mapping_and_research/state_maps.php
http://www.publicknowledge.org/ -
Brian Webster wrote:
> Charles,
> I am not against this stimulus package nor the mapping effort.
Understood.
There has
> been considerable criticism of connected nation and where they have
> responded to same, I have watched carefully.
I will look into this further. This is the first
ebster
-Original Message-
From: Charles Wyble [mailto:char...@thewybles.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 4:15 PM
To: WISPA General List
Cc: bwebs...@wirelessmapping.com
Subject: Re: [WISPA] NTIA mapping
Preach it Tom!
Wake up folks.
Regardless of your political views, your approval/disap
oject and move on.
>>> Trying to take on Connected Nation is a losing battle. Just step around
>>> them
>>> and move forward..there are plenty of ways to map the competitive
>>> broadband in a market without proprietary data and you can successfully do
>>
--
From: Tom DeReggi [mailto:wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net]
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 4:02 PM
To: bwebs...@wirelessmapping.com; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] NTIA mapping
Brian,
Thats where I disagree. I'm surprised to hear it come from you.
Quick Note: Just two years ago, CN was
m DeReggi
> RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
> IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Brian Webster"
> To: "WISPA General List"
> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 10:09 PM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] NTIA mapping
>
>
M
To: bwebs...@wirelessmapping.com; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] NTIA mapping
Brian,
Thats where I disagree. I'm surprised to hear it come from you.
Quick Note: Just two years ago, CN was nobody. They have gotten clout
because they got off their hind side and started working on a so
it doesn't have to be "cheaper".
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Webster"
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 10:09 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] NTIA mapping
>
eness of wireless coverage.
> This is clearly within the goal of the BTOP program, to increase adoption.
> Expecially to map your already served areas..
>
> Tom DeReggi
> RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
> IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
>
>
> - Original Message -
om DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Rick Harnish"
To: ; "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 7:22 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] NTIA mapping
> Chris,
>
> It is m
Brian Webster wrote:
> Amen Rick
>
> I've always maintained the thought that the 350 Million was another back
> door political payback to the Telco and cable companies via Connected
> Nation. With the fact that this funding gets put out there and then the data
> never really becomes availabl
on
>Behalf Of Rick Harnish
>Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 7:23 PM
>To: ccoo...@intelliwave.com; 'WISPA General List'
>Subject: Re: [WISPA] NTIA mapping
>
>
>Chris,
>
>It is my understanding that this bill was specifically written for Connected
>Nation. In a c
out money.
Thank You,
Brian Webster
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]on
Behalf Of Rick Harnish
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 7:23 PM
To: ccoo...@intelliwave.com; 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] NTIA mappin
Chris,
It is my understanding that this bill was specifically written for Connected
Nation. In a conversation today in Indianapolis I was told that if you
divide $350 million by 50 states you get $7,000,000 per state. This is
approximately 80% of the $9,000,000 contract they recently signed wit
Possibly, but I think it's more likely that the mapping money will go to
the states or big academic groups that are doing comprehensive maps over
wide geographic areas.
Again, it's a wait-and-see sort of thing, since the BTOP guidelines
aren't out yet.
InLine>
vickie edwards, MPA | Grant Specia
17 matches
Mail list logo
