Of Cameron Crum
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 12:22 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?
Licensed or unlic? If unlic, still no. I can put together an
unlicensed link for for less than $500 that will probably perform as
well as something costing $6000
]
On Behalf Of Cameron Crum
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 12:22 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?
Licensed or unlic? If unlic, still no. I can put together an unlicensed link
for for less than $500 that will probably perform as well as something
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
On Behalf Of Cameron Crum
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 3:11 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?
$8000 is expensive
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?
Guys,
I appreciate all the feedback. We're looking into Exalt 24GHz for a 3-mile
link. Not sure if it will reach that far ...
Anyone have direct experience with Exalt? We're using Dragonwave and love it,
but wanted to stay
02, 2011 8:36 AM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?
Guys,
I appreciate all the feedback. We're looking into Exalt 24GHz for a 3-mile
link. Not sure if it will reach that far ...
Anyone have direct experience with Exalt? We're using Dragonwave and love
...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Jerry Richardson
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 12:00 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?
24GHz @ 3 miles is not going to be stable unless is never rains
What about 5.4GHz? Moto PTP500 Lite will do 52Mbps now, and 105Mbps
] On Behalf Of Cameron Crum
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 12:22 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?
Licensed or unlic? If unlic, still no. I can put together an
unlicensed link for for less than $500 that will probably perform as
well as something
@wispa.orgmailto:wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?
Guys,
I appreciate all the feedback. We're looking into Exalt 24GHz for a 3-mile
link. Not sure if it will reach that far ...
Anyone have direct experience with Exalt? We're using Dragonwave and love
At 8/2/2011 01:34 PM, Gino Villarini wrote:
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary=_000_D26588DB857E2948835D6C7A27C9879E15DBBD68AEROMAIL1aerone_
Both Radwin and Motorola PTP500 would work well under high
interference, but if you want to go to a whole diff band, I
I have had a 3 mile 24ghz Ligowave link up for two years with very
little rain fade - maybe 15 minutes worth in the past two years.
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
On 8/2/2011 1:13 PM, Fred Goldstein wrote:
At 8/2/2011 01:34 PM, Gino Villarini wrote:
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type:
I think you just jinxed that link!
On 8/2/2011 2:32 PM, Matt Larsen - Lists wrote:
I have had a 3 mile 24ghz Ligowave link up for two years with very
little rain fade - maybe 15 minutes worth in the past two years.
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
On 8/2/2011 1:13 PM, Fred Goldstein wrote:
At
On 2 August 2011 16:32, Matt Larsen - Lists li...@manageisp.com wrote:
I have had a 3 mile 24ghz Ligowave link up for two years with very
little rain fade - maybe 15 minutes worth in the past two years.
Rain in the tropics and rain in the midwest are two *very* different things.
24ghz is unlicensed.
Sent via DROID on Verizon Wireless
-Original message-
From: Cameron Crum cc...@wispmon.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thu, Jul 28, 2011 14:02:52 GMT+00:00
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul
, July 29, 2011 2:12 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?
24ghz is unlicensed.
Sent via DROID on Verizon Wireless
-Original message-
From: Cameron Crum cc...@wispmon.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thu, Jul 28, 2011 14:02:52 GMT
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On
Behalf Of *Me
*Sent:* Friday, July 29, 2011 2:12 PM
*To:* WISPA General List
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?
** **
24ghz is unlicensed.
*Sent via DROID on Verizon Wireless*
-Original message-
*From
...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Cameron Crum
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 2:39 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?
I just assumed if you pay that much for a link it would be in the licensed
band. Still though, I can't imagine too
At 7/29/2011 02:38 PM, Cameron Crum wrote:
I just assumed if you pay that much for a link it would be in the
licensed band. Still though, I can't imagine too many people using
the unlicensed 24 ghz band, It should be pretty clear, but if you
can't bgo bigger than a 2ft dish, I guess you are
I'm aware of all that, but 24GHz still attenuates fairly quickly and rain
fade will be a problem if you try to go too far. It would be good for short
hops, though. It still seems a bit pricey.
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Fred Goldstein fgoldst...@ionary.comwrote:
At 7/29/2011 02:38 PM,
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?
I'm aware of all that, but 24GHz still attenuates fairly quickly and rain fade
will be a problem if you try to go too far. It would be good for short hops,
though. It still seems a bit pricey.
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 1:44
] *On
Behalf Of *Cameron Crum
*Sent:* Friday, July 29, 2011 2:58 PM
*To:* WISPA General List
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?
** **
I'm aware of all that, but 24GHz still attenuates fairly quickly and rain
fade will be a problem if you try to go too far
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Cameron Crum
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 2:58 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?
I'm aware of all
] *On
Behalf Of *Cameron Crum
*Sent:* Friday, July 29, 2011 3:11 PM
*To:* WISPA General List
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?
** **
$8000 is expensive to me for an unlicensed frequency. For just a bit more
you can get licensed. If I'm getting out of the $100s
...@aeronetpr.commailto:g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Cameron Crum
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 3:22 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?
Licensed or unlic
Crum
*Sent:* Friday, July 29, 2011 3:11 PM
*To:* WISPA General List
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?
** **
$8000 is expensive to me for an unlicensed frequency. For just a bit more
you can get licensed. If I'm getting out of the $100s range then I'll bite
What would you use to put together a 100Mbps FDX link for 500 bucks?
- Jerry
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Cameron Crum
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 12:22 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul
, July 29, 2011 12:22 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?
Licensed or unlic? If unlic, still no. I can put together an unlicensed
link for for less than $500 that will probably perform as well as something
costing $6000, and for another $500 I could have
OK, now just need to find 40MHz of spectrum. Oh wait, there isn't any
- Jerry
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 3:52 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul
...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 3:52 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul ?
ARC panel and nv2 in 40mhz?
On Jul 29, 2011 6:48 PM, Jerry Richardson jrichard...@aircloud.com
mailto:jrichard...@aircloud.com wrote:
What would you
] *On Behalf Of *Bob Moldashel
*Sent:* Wednesday, July 27, 2011 10:25 PM
*To:* wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul?
Two more things...
Radio has built in spectrum analyzer that works :-)
And I am told link is plane polarity so
...@wispa.org
mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On Behalf Of *Bob Moldashel
*Sent:* Wednesday, July 27, 2011 10:25 PM
*To:* wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul?
Two more things
...@wispa.orgmailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Bob Moldashel
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 10:25 PM
To: mailto:wireless@wispa.org wireless@wispa.orgmailto:wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul?
Two more things...
Radio has built in spectrum analyzer that works
2' dishes
Matt Larsen
Sent via DROID on Verizon Wireless
-Original message-
From: Gino Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Cc: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thu, Jul 28, 2011 13:10:27 GMT+00:00
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4
Has anyone tried the SnapLink Blast?
http://www.wisptech.com/index.php/Microwave_Backhaul_Comparison_Chart
shows 24GHz, 160M half-duplex, $6k ... if it really works, that's pretty
good, in my book
On 7/26/2011 10:47 AM, Adam Greene wrote:
This question has probably been asked on this list
The Snaplink only does about 22 Mbps.
Exalt just came out with a 24 Ghz. Full Duplex TDD radio that will do
100 Mbps and is capable of 3 non-overlapping channels. The price is the
same or cheaper.
I believe its 2 year warranty also.
-B-
On 7/27/2011 7:23 PM, Adam Greene wrote:
Has
9:50 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul?
The Snaplink only does about 22 Mbps.
Exalt just came out with a 24 Ghz. Full Duplex TDD radio that will do
100 Mbps and is capable of 3 non-overlapping channels. The price is the same
or cheaper.
I believe
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
On Behalf Of Bob Moldashel
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 9:50 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul?
The Snaplink only does about 22 Mbps.
Exalt just came
.
787.273.4143
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Bob Moldashel
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 10:05 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul?
No. Its unlicensed 24 Ghz. Spec
...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Bob Moldashel
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 10:05 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul?
No. Its unlicensed 24 Ghz. Spec sheet attached
-B-
On 7/27/2011 9:44 PM, Gino Villarini wrote
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Bob Moldashel
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 10:05 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8
mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Bob Moldashel
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 10:05 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul?
No. Its unlicensed 24 Ghz. Spec sheet attached
-B
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul?
Street price is about $7500 with 1' antennas and 200 Mbps aggregate with power
supplies.
About a 4 week lead time.
But 3 non-overlapping channels is the best
On 7/27/2011 9:56 PM, Gino Villarini wrote:
Nice! Price
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Bob Moldashel
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 10:05 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul?
No. Its unlicensed 24 Ghz. Spec sheet attached
-B-
On 7/27/2011 9:44 PM
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 10:25 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul?
Two more things...
Radio has built in spectrum analyzer that works :-)
And I am told link is plane polarity so only uses one polarity plane for
data...Not two.
-B-
On 7
: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul?
So no way for a 6 mile link even with 6 foot dishes? No idea what to put in a
path calc without knowing gains of dishes.
On Jul 27, 2011 10:09 PM, Bob Moldashel
lakel...@gbcx.netmailto:lakel...@gbcx.net wrote:
Anything from 1' on up. It has same
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul?
No. Its unlicensed 24 Ghz. Spec sheet attached
-B-
On 7/27/2011 9:44 PM, Gino Villarini wrote:
IIRC the Exalt unit is for Licensed Fiber Tower Freqs? No?
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com mailto:g...@aeronetpr.com
Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Bob Moldashel
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 10:17 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul?
Street price
...@wispa.org mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Bob Moldashel
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 10:05 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul?
No. Its unlicensed 24 Ghz. Spec
]
*On Behalf Of *Bob Moldashel
*Sent:* Wednesday, July 27, 2011 10:25 PM
*To:* wireless@wispa.org
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul?
** **
Two more things...
Radio has built in spectrum analyzer that works :-)
And I am told link is plane polarity so only uses
: Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul?
Maybe it is. I am only going by word of mouth on that. That's why I said I
am told.. Don't want to put my foot in my mouth...
:-)
On 7/27/2011 10:11 PM, Gino Villarini wrote:
That's weird, FCC regulations specify cross Pol... I think
-boun...@wispa.org
mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
[mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On Behalf Of *Bob Moldashel
*Sent:* Wednesday, July 27, 2011 10:25 PM
*To:* wireless@wispa.org mailto:wireless@wispa.org
*Subject:* Re: [WISPA] inexpensive non-2.4/5.8 backhaul?
Two more
50 matches
Mail list logo
