PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 1:44 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] was School WiFi , about technical values.
Mark,
I'm going to reply but this will be my last reply on this subject. I don't
want to exceed my 5 posts per day limit any more than necessary
You a HAM operator, Jack?
- Original Message -
From: Jack Unger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 10:52 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] was School WiFi , about technical values.
Mark,
Certification verifies that the signals conducted
Felix,
I think motivating manufacturers is a simple as:
1. Asking them WHAT FCC certified systems they offer?
2. If the answer is none, ask them WHEN they expect to be offering
certified systems?
3. If the answer is they have no plans then ask them WHY NOT and
inform them that too much
General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 10:52 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] was School WiFi , about technical values.
Mark,
Certification verifies that the signals conducted into the power line
and the signals radiated into the air from a wireless system are clean
and that they do
11:09 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] was School WiFi , about technical values.
Felix,
I think motivating manufacturers is a simple as:
1. Asking them WHAT FCC certified systems they offer?
2. If the answer is none, ask them WHEN they expect to be offering
certified systems?
3. If the answer
PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 11:09 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] was School WiFi , about technical values.
Felix,
I think motivating manufacturers is a simple as:
1. Asking them WHAT FCC certified systems they offer?
2. If the answer is none, ask
wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 11:14 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] was School WiFi , about technical values.
I am a ham and I have been for 48 years. I've also held an FCC
Commercial License for 28 years. Without my ham experience, I doubt that
I would have been able to transition
qualities of their
equipment.
- Original Message -
From: Jack Unger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 11:14 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] was School WiFi , about technical values.
I am a ham and I have been for 48 years. I've also held
- Original Message -
From: Jack Unger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 11:44 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] was School WiFi , about technical values.
Mark,
I'm going to reply but this will be my last reply on this subject. I
don't
: Monday, April 30, 2007 1:44 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] was School WiFi , about technical values.
Mark,
I'm going to reply but this will be my last reply on this subject. I don't
want to exceed my 5 posts per day limit any more than necessary. :)
Yes, I understand about receiver selectivity
Mark-
Which is it?
Quote 1:
Shaky is the term I used, because this classification isn't law, just FCC
opinion. That's obviously subject to whatever breeze blows through DC.
Now that there is no longer consistency in all matters, the defense against
Quote 2:
kinda doubt it's going to
- Original Message -
From: Rick Herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 12:20 PM
Subject: Regulators: Fickle or Not WAS: RE: [WISPA] was School WiFi ,about
technical values.
Mark-
Which is it?
Quote 1:
Shaky
, 2007 3:07 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: Regulators: Fickle or Not WAS: RE: [WISPA] was School WiFi ,
about technical values.
- Original Message -
From: Rick Herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 12:20 PM
Subject
.
- Original Message -
From: Rick Herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 1:17 PM
Subject: RE: Regulators: Fickle or Not WAS: RE: [WISPA] was School WiFi
,about technical values.
Mark-
No, I am just asking about your true opinion
: Monday, April 30, 2007 3:21 PM
Subject: RE: Regulators: Fickle or Not WAS: RE: [WISPA] was School WiFi
,about technical values.
Well, I still can't follow you. Of course you don't particularly wish to
argue it; you can't seem to answer my question about your true feelings
regarding the FCC
See comment inline, near end of post.
Mark Koskenmaki wrote:
- Original Message -
From: George Rogato [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 5:05 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] School WiFi / Wireless info ?
Dawn DiPietro wrote:
Mike,
If
Jack - I would be interested in motivating the
manufacturers. I work for a large manufacturer but
plan to go to a smaller company becase I like working
in focused delta team environment. But I can see how
working with manufacturers can be helpful. Can you
provide additional thoughts.
Marlon -
Koskenmaki wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jack Unger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 10:05 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] was School WiFi , about technical values.
See comment inline, near end of post.
Wrong. Certification DOES test
18 matches
Mail list logo
