Hi,
Thank you for doing this work. Puts Wireshark at the bleeding edge :)
One request though: could you make this into a normal dissector, not a
plugin? It already depends on changes in the build-in SDP dissector, so it
should be added as a build-in as well.
Thanx,
Jaap
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007,
)
-
Header|Message if first 3 bits (type) is 000
Header|Binary Data 001
Header|Message|Binary Data 111
-
On 3/6/07, Jaap Keuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Hi,
I can see your frustration. You like to be appreciated for the work done
on creating a feature/patch you want to share with the world. That is what
OSS is all about. On the other hand the project owner' has to walk a
fine line, getting enough committers in, who don't get compensation, while
Hi,
Indeed these are the steps to take. Don't distribute outside your company
without providing the sources.
Thanx,
Jaap
On Fri, 9 Mar 2007, Ravi Kondamuru wrote:
Hi,
I am looking for a model on how wireshark dissector/wiretap addons are
developed exclusively for use within a company. I
Hi,
I've seen it been done. It was based on a message decoder that passed back
a data structure of the message. Then there was a whole bunch of wireshark
code to display all the structure members. Varying messages had varying
structures so it ended up being a whole lot of
Hi,
Webpage looks good.
You can find all you need to know for setting up a development environment
in the developer guide on the website documentation section.
The source tree contains a doc directory with README files.
README.developer is what you want to read.
Thanx,
Jaap
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007,
Hi,
Send it to list (if not too big) or open a bugzilla item for it.
We'll have a look. If it doesn't break stuff, it should be fine.
Have a look in the developer guide and Wiki about submitting patches.
Thanx,
Jaap
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007, Martin Sustrik wrote:
Hi all,
I've written dissector
Hi,
I've added the Ethernet type (88D9) for it. Someone looking for a project
can goto http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/Rally/LLTD-spec.mspx for the spec.
A sample capture would be nice as well.
Thanx,
Jaap
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Stephen Fisher wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 06:08:23PM +0530,
Hi,
I don't understand. Do you want to share the object/DLL, or the complete
WS source code, or create a patch? Or are you worried about distribution
in the GPL sense?
Thanx,
Jaap
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007, Martin Sustrik wrote:
Hi,
The question I've actually wanted to ask was: Is there a way
to
Uh oh,
We've become download of the day at Lifehacker:
http://lifehacker.com/software/networking/download-of-the-day-wireshark-all-platforms-254218.php
Thanx,
Jaap
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Hi,
Revision 21563 breaks my build on several places, using GCC 4.1.2 on
Debian lenny/sid. I already hacked packet-ipsec.c, but next up is
packet-bpdu.c, reporting:
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
packet-bpdu.c: In function 'dissect_bpdu':
packet-bpdu.c:252: warning: pointer of type 'void
Hi,
Nice clean patch. Committed in revision 21599.
Thanx,
Jaap
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Secfire wrote:
Hi Dev,
Attachment is a patch for adding a new Juniper NSRP dissector. In this
patch, OICQ author email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] has also been
updated to [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Later I will
Hi,
Patch looks good, not too sure about the to_hexadecimal though.
Thanx,
Jaap
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Olivier MONTANUY wrote:
Hello,
I opened a a bug report #1579 to signal that epan/dissectors/packet-netflow.c
currently cannot decode Netflow options, because it does not take into
account
Hi,
Checked in.
Thanx,
Jaap
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Matt Addison wrote:
Problem:
The existing sll dissector does not handle ppp_hdlc packets (sll.ltype
== 0x0007).
Resolution:
Alter packet-sll.c to call the ppp_hdlc dissector when a packet with
sll.ltype=0x0007 is received.
Why:
Bringing
Hi people,
The build is breaking in several places, so lets get it green again.
One problem is with the h245 changes by Anders. A missing type in the
template. Another is with winreg.c. My own build breaks at a missing rule
to make asn1.lo.
Thanx,
Jaap
Hi,
I've incorporated the Win32 resources starting from the 0.99.5 release,
so that's why your code probably doesn't have these resources.
One thing you can do is use the strings utility, which tries to display
everything that looks like a string in an executable file.
sysinternals' process
Hi,
I ended up hacking the wget config file, setting the proxy stuff there.
Thanx,
Jaap
On Fri, 11 May 2007, Stephen Fisher wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 04:28:02PM -0600, Tyler De Haven Brown wrote:
P.S.-I had to download the files manually, because even when setting
the http_proxy
Hi list,
From http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-announce-list/2007-May/msg5.html
-
GTK+ 2.10.12 released
* From: Matthias Clasen mclasen redhat com
* To: gnome-announce-list gnome org, gtk-devel-list gnome org,
Hi,
Multiple things are wrong with the recently added OpCua plugin:
- There are no properties on the directory or the files,
- The headers are missing from the Makefile.common, breaking the dist,
- Not all DISSECTOR_SRC are dissector main entry point. The rest should be
in the
Hi,
Some additional notes:
+ {REGISTRATION_REVOCATION, Registration Revocation},
+ {REGISTRATION_REVOCATION, Registration Revocation Acknowledgement},
The second one misses _ACKNOWLEDGEMENT in the symbol
{0, NULL},
};
Don't put a comma after the last initializer. It's just poor style.
Hi,
The opcua plugin came a long way. :)) Two more questions though.
Do we need to include gmodule.h everywhere? I think including glib.h is
what's needed.
Do we need to link against dissectors.lib ?
(LINK_PLUGIN_WITH=..\..\epan\libwireshark.lib
..\..\epan\dissectors\dissectors.lib)
I can't
Hi list,
Can someone test the current Windows build against the capture in bug
1360? It's a critical bug we need to get closed, like the other 13
criticals.
Since we've almost 200 bugs open, 14 critical, we need to get cracking at
them before we're going to see a release anytime soon.
Thanx,
Hi Gerald,
On the Wireshark download page a PAD file can be found that can be used
for version checking. Version checking is an item on the release list for
.6 (Win32). What I can't figure out is how the update is being checked on
the client PC? How/by what software is the PAD file being checked
Hi list,
Can our TCP dissection experts have a look at the proposal in bug 1550?
http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1550
Seems like a valuable improvement, but I can't judge all implications.
Thanx,
Jaap
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Hi,
No.
See http://wiki.wireshark.org/Tools
Thanx,
Jaap
On Wed, 23 May 2007, James McLellan wrote:
Hi,
Is there a capability in Wireshark (or a plugin) to
allow playback of captured packets?
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Hi,
The code looks oke, one question though. Why is the ethertype in a
preference? Are there non-IEEE-ethertype-standard implementations in the
wild, or is this a development left over? If so, better get it out.
A sample capture would be usefull for fuzztesting, so yes please.
Thanx,
Jaap
On
Hi,
Checked in.
Thanx,
Jaap
On Thu, 24 May 2007, Brian Vandenberg wrote:
I ran into a problem trying to debug some of my stuff yesterday that
depends on the http dissector, and the server I'm working with defaults
to ssl traffic; whenever I try to debug it, it always gets hung up on
the
Hi,
For one the eth_handle is most likely a module global variable, so used
elsewhere. Could you name the dissector you saw this in?
The other thing to notice is that it is not very smart to quote your
registration info, including password, in a public mailing list.
Better change is REAL
Hi,
Sure, give us some info on the environment you're building in. Compiler,
tarball or SVN checkout, OS, stuff like that.
Thanx,
Jaap
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007, Tyler De Haven Brown wrote:
I'm new to wireshark and having problems with the first build
Get the following error message box:
into issues.
Thanks,
Tyler
Original message
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 07:44:40 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jaap Keuter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] problem building wireshark
To: Developer support list for Wireshark wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Hi,
Sure
Hi,
Could you recreate the patch against the current tree? Your revision
21417 is too old and doesn't apply.
Thanx,
Jaap
Victor Fajardo wrote:
To wireshark-maintainers,
Attached is a patch file for the PANA protocol dissector. The changes
updates the packet-pana.c dissector to support
Hi,
Committed in revision 22098.
Thanx,
Jaap
Victor Fajardo wrote:
Hi,
Attached is a patch based on rev 22093.
regards,
victor
Hi,
Could you recreate the patch against the current tree? Your revision
21417 is too old and doesn't apply.
Thanx,
Jaap
Victor Fajardo wrote:
Hi,
Committed in revision 22128 after a few changes:
- replaced C++ with C comments
- replaced %llu format string by % G_GINT64_MODIFIER u
Thanx,
Jaap
Łukasz M. wrote:
Hi.
I'm new here, so hello everyone. :)
I added 5 new packets to packet-edonkey.c and improve 2. Diffs in
attachment.
Hi Mirko,
Please refer to http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/LibpcapFileFormat
about this subject.
Thanx,
Jaap
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I’ve been making Protocol Analyzer based on Sangoma S5142A synch serial
card and WireShark. Capturing of X.25 LAPB and PLP layers is done by
Hi,
Can you run Wireshark in DDD so you can get a backtrace?
See http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/Tips
Thanx,
Jaap
yin sun wrote:
Hello,
I have compiled wireshark from 0.99.5 source on Suse10 Linux
2.6.16.27-0.9-smp x86. Initial launch is ok, change/save preference is
ok, but
Hi,
The plugin looks good, now we need some sample captures for a testdrive
(fuzztest). Can you whip up a Wiki protocol page and add the sample
captures?
Thanx,
Jaap
Newton, Don wrote:
I have corrected all deficits that were noted. I also have changed so
rudp sequence id shows in info
Google is your best friend.
http://www.kmrconsulting.com/free_download.html
Thanx,
Jaap
Martin Mathieson wrote:
Thanks Luis,
I want to avoid turning the laptop I was using yesterday into another
dev machine :)
Martin
On 6/19/07, Luis EG Ontanon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what about
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jaap Keuter
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 5:01 PM
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Patch] Unistim dissector plugin
Hi,
The plugin looks good, now we need some sample captures for a testdrive
or tomorrow.
Don Newton
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jaap Keuter
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 5:01 PM
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Patch] Unistim dissector plugin
Hi,
The plugin looks
Hi,
This sounds all overly complicated. You could deduce which
executable/DLL is affected by you changes by unraveling the build
process, but it's much easier to build you own full installer.
Thanx,
Jaap
Greg Bell wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to make some modifications to Wireshark and package
Hi Ken,
Did a quick review of your article. These are the point you could improve.
8---
7.0 Your Dissector Code
You can use a text editor of your choice to open the
packet-yourprotocol.c. Let's take it line by line:
#ifdef HAVE_CONFIG_H
# include config.h
#endif
#include
Hi Frederic,
I noticed that Wireshark 0.99.6pre1 came in on testing so it would be
great if you can send the new package files to the list so they can be
put into the repository before the real 0.99.6 comes out.
Thanx,
Jaap
___
Wireshark-dev mailing
Hi,
Now that WinPcap 4.0.1 is out a release of 0.99.pre3 is possible.
I would like to request holding off until I've got the debian packaging
updates from Frederic Peters in, which I've got lined up in my working
copy. Tomorrow morning, when I'm fresh and sober, I'll review them one
last time
been assigned Brisket
Duty. :)
Jaap Keuter wrote:
Hi,
Now that WinPcap 4.0.1 is out a release of 0.99.pre3 is possible.
I would like to request holding off until I've got the debian packaging
updates from Frederic Peters in, which I've got lined up in my working
copy. Tomorrow morning
Hi,
You could play around with ntp_fmt_ts(const guint8 *reftime) and see
what happens. That function is found in packet-ntp.c and the source for
the code in packet-diameter.c.
Thanx,
Jaap
cco wrote:
hi!
the people designing ntp came up with a timestamp format which rolls over
every 136
Hi,
It would have been nice if it contained an up to date user manual i.s.o.
a 5 month old version. Could that item be added to the release procedure?
I've already checked in a patch that proposes to install WinPcap 4.0.1
over 4.0.0, which the current installer doesn't do.
Thanx,
Jaap
Gerald
Hi,
I think everyone should bring his passport so we can address Bug 1086.
Thanx,
Jaap
Gerald Combs wrote:
This is entirely hypothetical, but if someone were to host a 3-day
Wireshark conference, what sort of sessions would you be interested in?
If enough developers attended, would there be
Hi,
See the README.developer file in the doc directory, chapter 1.8 Calling
Other Dissectors.
Thanx,
Jaap
Yashwant Shitoot wrote:
Hello,
My protocol is encapsulated in udp. I am able to dissect this part without
problem. The remaining data I need to pass to another protocol RTCP or
Hi,
In the mean time let me remind everyone it is not allowed to simply drop
preferences from your code. Once it's in there it's in the preference
files and warnings like this appear if you do take it out.
The mechanism to solve this is by replacing your preference registration
by:
Hi,
Committed in revision 22282.
Thanx,
Jaap
Victor Fajardo wrote:
Hi Jaap,
I found a small problem with the previous patch I've sent. I've attached
a patch that fixes this issue; the patch is based on the latest rev I
could get.
regards,
victor
Hi,
Committed in revision 22098.
Hi,
Should we make dissector_add() and friends fail silently when the
referenced dissector is not available? Currently the g_assert() is
killing, while a return would suffice.
This becomes more relevant since we can delete a dissector on the fly,
so we may run into this assert while not
Hi,
First thing to so it testdrive it using fuzztest. Have a collection of
capture files ready which fuzztest will feed to your Wireshark+plugin.
That way you may find bugs not found during code review.
Then make sure all support files are in as stated in README.plugin.
Then 'make clean' the
Hi,
Checked in.
Thanx,
Jaap
Jim Paris wrote:
Hi,
The encap_table_base in wcap.c is missing an entry.
This causes e.g. dumpcap -i usb3 -L to output:
Data link types (use option -y to set):
USB_LINUX
(MPEG)
-jim
diff -urN --exclude=debian
Hi,
Added a remark to README.developer to that effect.
Thanx,
Jaap
Albert Chin wrote:
Fix to avoid anonymous union which Sun Studio 11 C compiler doesn't
like.
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Hi,
Then maybe you've a scheme how to work this into the installer as well?
I've tried but failed to see a future proof construct.
Thanx,
Jaap
Gianluca Varenni wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ulf Lamping [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Sent: Thursday, July 12,
Graham Bloice wrote:
Ulf Lamping wrote:
Hi List!
After I repeatedly stumbled over not having the right form of the
zlib.dll on my computer (MSVC6: binary dll, all other MSVC: compile it
yourself from sources) and the setup target only downloads one of them,
it makes me think to drop the
NKS wrote:
Sub: how can i hack wireshark to show the actual data(decoded) ?
Please have a look at the following screenshot(wireshark)
hxxp://img512.imageshack.us/img512/1255/data1448bytesyb7.jpg
( same screenshot also available at the following link
hxxp://i11.tinypic.com/4qr3j48.jpg )
I
Hi,
You'll need a maintainer clean for that. Or maybe deleting
epan/dissectors/register.* is enough.
Thanx,
Jaap
Yashwant Shitoot wrote:
Hello,
I am changing my dissector from built in to plugin
removed it from
Makefile.common in 'epan/dissectors'. Added everywhere
according to
Hi,
it's specifically talking about 'Windows SDK for Windows Vista', not
vc2005ee on Vista, so this should be oke.
You may want to consider working with 0.99.6 sources though.
Thanx,
Jaap
sandeep gangadharan wrote:
Hello all
Will my compillation work with vc2005ee+windows
Hi,
Look for gtkrc and see that it declares two toolbars: large and small.
The small one is used, but changing this into large gets you the larger
icons.
Thanx,
Jaap
Ulf Lamping wrote:
Just out of curiosity, i noticed the size of toolbar icons in the Windows
version is rather small.
They
Hi,
Checked in.
Thanx,
Jaap
Francois-Xavier Le Bail wrote:
Hi,
The following patch decode DHCP option 121.
(RFC 3442)
Output example :
Option: (t=121,l=59) Classless Static Route
Option: (121) Classless Static Route
Length: 59
Value:
Hi,
Overruns aren't a problem as long as you end the value_string array with
the closing tuple {0, NULL}.
Thanx,
Jaap
Nitin Naveen wrote:
Hello,
Thank you Martin and Sawada san for your comments.
I am OK with any plug-in name and I leave it up to you to decide.
I also accept most of the
Hi,
I would say a page below http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development
Thanx,
Jaap
Kelvin Proctor wrote:
G'day Wireshark Team,
In the last few days I have succeeded in getting a dissector plugin
running
that is a mixed-mode C++ assembly (for those unfamiliar with
Microsoft.NET
this dll is
Hi,
Can anyone tell me why this hideous hack is in the m2m plugin?
case TLV_FRAME_NUM:
/* get the frame number */
g_frame_number = tvb_get_ntoh24( tvb,
offset );
Hi Markus,
Two things.
First we've recently changed our patch submission policy, instead of
posting to the lis you can attach you patches to a bugzilla entry and
request review for submission. This is done to not let patches, like
yours, get overlooked.
Second you patch reverts back to the
Hi,
Better file a bugreport on that.
Thanx,
Jaap
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks
in epan/dissector/packet-ipv6.h there is a mistacke in the assigned
number of the update request and update ack shim6 control message.
Accordingly to draft-ietf-shim6-proto-08 page 93 the
Hi,
Wireshark can help you here. See doc/README.developer, chapter 2.7.1
Using tcp_dissect_pdus().
Thanx,
Jaap
Silvia Cristina Tejedor wrote:
Dear Mr,
I m working on the packet reception and treatement with the PCE protocol
which runs over TCP. The PCE protocol takes the TCP data and
Hi,
Two things.
1. We've recently changed the patch submission policy to go through
bugzilla. This in order to have patches like this not overlooked.
2. I can't comment on the merits of the patch in relation to the draft
referenced, but I've spotted this code error:
/* Reserved field
Hi Don,
This is the last message I've sent about UNISTIM. Since then nothing was
heard. Still we would like to get it in, since there's interest in it.
Are you still working on it?
Thanx,
Jaap
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 08:47:19 +0200
From: Jaap Keuter [EMAIL
Hi,
You may want to follow the external link listed.
Thanx,
Jaap
J P wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Where can I get a copy of the Nortel Unistim Protocol Specification
PDF referred in http://wiki.wireshark.org/UNISTIM?
Wireshark
The Unistim dissector is partially
Oh no, not this flamewar again...
On the plus side: yes, your development cycle and intermediate release
is easier.
On the min side: You don't have the full API (on Win32 that is).
IMHO when a protocol is complete (stable RFC or whatever standard bodies
publish) and dissector is fully
Hi,
A unistim plugin for Wireshark is in the works. It's currently at the
stage of fuzztesting, which shows some problems. Once that's done it's
complete and added to the repository.
Thanx,
Jaap
J P wrote:
Hi Everyone,
This may be off topic, but it may be useful in the development of the
Hi,
There's a long standing bug on this: bug 1088.
Fixing that would be most appreciated.
Thanx,
Jaap
Luis EG Ontanon wrote:
You'll keep that feature :-)
char* format_oid_decoded(guint8* oid, guint32 len) {
char* result;
guint32 matched;
oid_info_t* oid_info =
Hi,
Checked in.
Please note that the new way of sending patches is through bugzilla.
This to make sure patches, like these, don't end up being overlooked.
Thanx,
Jaap
Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
Hi,
please find enclosed a patch to update BA status code for PMIPv6
according to
Luis EG Ontanon wrote:
Might be a buffer overflow overwriting it.
- break after protocol registration.
- find the object that gets altered,
- set a watchpoint on that memory location
- continue until the watchpoint tells you who and where it gets overwritten.
Luis
On 8/15/07, Jaap Keuter
Hi,
That would be image/wssplash.xpm.
Thanx,
Jaap
On Sun, 19 Aug 2007, Michal Kelner wrote:
Hi,
I would like to add some changes in the WS GUI, editing the icon a little bit
(adding some graphics to it), while still keeping its original look-and-feel.
I've made some changes in /image
Hi,
The unistim plugin was added to the repository in revision 22558. The
buildbot builds are in the download section.
Thanx,
Jaap
Jaap Keuter wrote:
Hi,
A unistim plugin for Wireshark is in the works. It's currently at the
stage of fuzztesting, which shows some problems. Once that's
4f 4e 4b 17 0a 1b 04 20 05
.GRONK .
0070 34 32 32 30 17 06 10 81 04 24
4220.$
Do you know what I am doing wrong so that I am seeing only data and not
the Unistim Decode?
Thanx,
John
*From*: Jaap Keuter [EMAIL
Hi,
Ahh crap. Installers, you think you've got them all. Not so :/
Thanx,
Jaap
Guy Harris wrote:
J P wrote:
I do not see a UNISTIM plug-in in the C:\Program
Files\Wireshark\plugins\0.99.7-SVN-22562 directory or an updated
RUDP.DLL file.
Does one have to do something specific to
Hi,
I can tell you that it's decoded fine. A call to 2600 and a few seconds
RTP with you blowing in the mic twice ;)
Just give the buildbot a little time to spit out the build of revision
22563.
Thanx,
Jaap
J P wrote:
Hi,
Attached is a capture file for a call made in our lab.
-John
Hi,
Then it the unistim dissector should feed the voip call tap with
relevant info. I'm not sure this can be done from a plugin.
You can always get the audio by means of RTP analysis. Get all streams,
pick out the stream(s) of interest, save it to an .au file and play that.
Sure, the voip
Hi,
Whenever our Fearless Leader(sm) Gerald decides there's enough
improvments/security fixes collected in the repository to be pushed out
as a release he'll start the process.
About Beta software; technically Wireshark still is beta software until
we reach 1.0. But then again what defines a
Hi,
Checked in a fix like that.
Thanx,
Jaap
Anders Broman (AL/EAB) wrote:
Hi,
Currently the build bot is failing with:
packet-pana.c(677) : error C2220: warning treated as error - no object
file generated packet-pana.c(677) : warning C4244: '=' : conversion from
'unsigned short ' to
Hi,
So that is a general objection to the line-style, not so much providing
additional information. Sorry, but that gets a markdown in my book.
Sure, the style may be less ideal, but style consistency should take
precedence.
Thanx,
Jaap
Stig Bjørlykke wrote:
Den 23. aug. 2007 kl. 00.34
Hi,
As defined in README.developer:
static hf_register_info hf[] = {
{ hf_PROTOABBREV_FIELDABBREV,
{ FIELDNAME, PROTOABBREV.FIELDABBREV,
FIELDTYPE, FIELDBASE, FIELDCONVERT, BITMASK,
FIELDDESCR,
Hi,
Add its name to the DISSECTOR_SUPPORT_SRC symbol in Makefile.common.
Thanx,
Jaap
Amit Paliwal wrote:
i am writing a plugin which contains *packet-xxx.c *file and i am
writing one *packet-xxx-ie.h *file which contains some relevent
prototype declarations of function used and i am
Hi John,
Added your request to the TODO file in the unistim plugin directory.
Thanx,
Jaap
J P wrote:
Hi,
Would it be possible to add the UNISTIM CMD text for each UNISTIM
command in a packet to the Info field of the Decode Summary?
For example display the following for the UNISTIM
Hi,
My build breaks on oids.c
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
oids.c: In function 'register_mibs':
oids.c:464: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break
strict-aliasing rules
oids.c:476: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break
strict-aliasing rules
make[1]: ***
;
} smi_module_t;
to
typedef struct smi_module_t {
void* dummy;
char* name;
} smi_module_t;
Is the warning gone?
Luis
On 8/27/07, Jaap Keuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
My build breaks on oids.c
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
oids.c: In function
if this
thing flies.
Thanx,
Jaap
On 8/27/07, Jaap Keuter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Sorry, no luck :-(
Thanx,
Jaap
Luis EG Ontanon wrote:
I got it... Optimizer is smart enough to reduce struct smi_module_t {
char* name; } into char* but not insightfull enought to knwo it did it
itself
Hi,
And on Debian (lenny/sid), with packages libsmi, libsmi2-dev and
libsmi2-common loaded it can't find these:
COPS-PR-SPPI
COPS-PR-SPPI-TC
DIFFSERV-PIB
FRAMEWORK-PIB
There located in /ust/share/pibs but this directory is not loaded by
default. I'm not sure why, but it seems a work directory
Hi,
I was thinking about Wireshark specific tags as well, but using ~/.smirc
for that is probably wrong. Which $HOME should that be? It should go in
the global smi.config to have it available for everyone. Not sure I like
the idea of changing the global config.
Their should be another way. Just
Hi,
I'm missing the line 10 ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ??
Thanx,
Jaap
Varuna De Silva wrote:
Hi Michael,
Thanks for the reply, heres the text file attached
Xavier
00 5c 5e 18 85 1a e2 45 70
08 83 56 13 77 70
Hi,
I've a few questions on this. First of all what's the status of this
external tpncp.dat file? Under what license is it distributed?
I'm not sure if I like the idea of such a 'flexible' dissector since we
never can be sure of the quality of the dissector since it depends on
the tpncp.dat
Hi,
How about 'make tshark' ?
Thanx,
Jaap
Lukast dev wrote:
Hello, i'm trying to learn to code line-taper and dissector and i don't
have much experiences with
configure...but could you help me to speed up the building process of
tshark?
I usually edit tap-myname.c and
Hi,
Committed revision 22864.
Thanx,
Jaap
Thomas Sillaber wrote:
Attached is a patch for packet-bootp.c to support Alcatel-Lucent TFTP1 and
TFTP2 vendor specific options.
brgds
TS
___
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
Hi,
Better contact the TCPdump/libpcap mailing list
(http://www.tcpdump.org/) and WinPcap (http://www.winpcap.org) mailing
list and ask how to get ahead. A DLT_ value could be all you need?
Thanx,
Jaap
Will Barker wrote:
We currently produce PC-based WAN products. These include support for
Hi,
This has already been solved upstream, see
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=457641
Implement the same fix locally and you'll be fine.
Thanx,
Jaap
Richard van der Hoff wrote:
Hi all,
I've just upgraded my version of glib (now 2.14.0), and now I get a load
of warnings like:
Hi,
The buildbot is working on revision 22911, which contains this feature.
Thanx,
Jaap
Jaap Keuter wrote:
Hi,
I'll clean up the dissector source somewhat and add two port mappings.
They'll be on the IANA registered ports though, and I suggest you'll do
the same, if possible
Hi,
mergecap is your friend here.
Thanx,
Jaap
Ming Zhang wrote:
Hi All
I wonder whether wireshark has this feature.
I am doing some tcp/ip analysis between 1 client and 1 server. I capture
the trace from both boxes. Now wonder if wireshark or any other tool can
examine both traces at
201 - 300 of 1401 matches
Mail list logo
