It gets worse... W3C gave you a CSS ERROR, which means they checked
your site just as you were editing, I'm sure... so the name is wrong,
the listing is wrong, and now you are disqualified from the featured
list. Hate it when that happens!On 9/22/05, Stuart Sherwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
You're doing well Andy. You made it onto Screenspire...
http://screenspire.com/go-image/www.clearleft.com/
Congrats!
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints
Christian Montoya wrote:
It gets worse... W3C gave you a CSS ERROR, which means they checked
your site just as you were editing, I'm sure... so the name is wrong,
the listing is wrong, and now you are disqualified from the featured
list. Hate it when that happens!
Just goes to show you that
Christian Montoya wrote:
It gets worse... W3C gave you a CSS ERROR, which means they checked
your
site just as you were editing, I'm sure... so the name is wrong,
the listing
is wrong, and now you are disqualified from the featured list. Hate
it when
that happens!
That's very odd.
It would seem that the CSS validator has a bug in its handling of
number values.
The CSS spec says that:
A number can either be an integer, or it can be zero or more
digits followed by a dot (.) followed by one or more digits.
So 1 and 1.0 are both valid numbers.
However if you run the
Hey Andy,
Nice looking site, simple, clean, well laid out and easy to read, good
stuff.
That's very odd. Anybody got any idea why the CSS validator should be
throwing up an error on:
line-height: 1;
but is happy with
line-height: 1.0;
?
Looks like a bug in the validator to me.
I'd
I'd say so, but wouldn't the error have more to do with the fact
that the
value of line-height needs a unit of reference (px, % or em)?
No, line height is one of the few properties that can take a number
without a unit. The unit acts as a multiplier, whereas an em say, is
based on the
Andy,
It would seem that the CSS validator has a bug in its handling of
number values.
I've been doing a lot of checking with the validator of late (results
next week at WE05)
The last few days or so they clearly made some big changes to the
validator, and there appear to be some
Ryan Blunden wrote:
Andy Budd wrote:
That's very odd. Anybody got any idea why the CSS validator should be
throwing up an error on:
line-height: 1;
but is happy with
line-height: 1.0;
Looks like a bug in the validator to me.
I'd say so, but wouldn't the error have more to
Quoting Webmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
My concern is that the Enter key is also the default key to submit forms. An
onKeypress event could be trigger by most any other key, preferably the
spacebar. Although, as we know, this key also has the function of making
selections in radio groups and
Thanks guys for pointing that out, very useful.
Ryno
-Original Message-
Ryan Blunden wrote:
Andy Budd wrote:
That's very odd. Anybody got any idea why the CSS validator should be
throwing up an error on:
line-height: 1;
but is happy with
line-height: 1.0;
Looks like
cool! i meant MISHA'S friend. dunno what happened
maggie galbraith
maggiesmeanderings.com
On Thu Sep 22 4:27 , 'Ryan Blunden' [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:
Thanks guys for pointing that out, very useful.
Ryno
-Original Message-
Ryan Blunden wrote:
Andy Budd wrote:
That's very
From: Colin Meerveld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I' am building an accessible horizontal menu. I have some problems
with tabbing the menu. I tested the menu in IE 6.0, Firefox 1.05 and
opera 8.0. IE and Opera doesn't support it at all and firefox only
with javascript. It does navigate to the menu but the
Title: Message
I have a problem on
my pages where there is a space between the navigation and the image, there is
like a 3 pixels space, but only when I view it in anything else but Internet
Explorer.
http://www.pacificfox.com.au
The homepage
validates.
Anyone any
ideas on this, also
G'day
I have a problem on my pages where there is a space between the navigation
and the image, there is like a 3 pixels space, but only when I view it in
anything else but Internet Explorer.
http://www.pacificfox.com.au
Add this to your style sheet: img { vertical-align:top; }(Or just
Might be worth reporting this to the validator people
I did that straight off, but it turns out its already a known bug.
Yours
Andy Budd
http://www.andybudd.com/
01273 241355
07880 636677
**
The discussion list for
I have had this same problem - fortunately it's easy to fix. As an
alternative you can do this: img src=yourImage.jpg
style=display:block; /.
If you image is sitting inline - add a float:left; to keep it inline.
Works like a charm.
Bert Doorn wrote:
G'day
I have a problem on my pages where
Sorry I read the article partly and look at the main menu. I hadn't
read the following part.
If your vision is perfect, but you cannot use a mouse, your
experience could be similar. Imagine having to use your tab key, and
each time you tab into the menu, you must keep tabbing until you tab
Webmaster wrote:
The far simpler way would be simpy to use:
ol start=3 type=1
li class=MsoNormalText/li
li class=MsoNormalText/li
li class=MsoNormalText/li
/ol
This would render as:
3. Text
4. Text
5. Text
The poster wants:
3.1. Text
3.2. Text
3.3. Text
--
Add this to your style sheet: img { vertical-align:top; }
(Or just
for images in a certain section)
That seemed to work, weird, I had vertical-align:top; on the images itself.
Incidentally, you might want to have a look at the site with images
disabled. Or load it over a dial-up
PS. Any ideas on the headers just below the banner, that are not in the same
spot as in Internet Explorer?
If we take the portfolio page for example, the header portfolio in IE is
in the spot where I want it, in anything else it is way to high. I could
position it absolute to the top of the page,
Hi Isabel,
Firstly your request was a *whole lot* for us list members to take in, hence
the lack of responses.
Secondly, the list is fine for me in IE6 (Windows XP, Service Pack 2).
The list is expanded as the page loads, the script then seems to load which
collapses the list. The images
I must assume that you are trying to get the background colors to
stretch down to the bottom of the main content?
In this situation I usually add something like this below the content to
force those wrappers down.
div style=clear:both;height:0px;nbsp;/div
That forces the wrappers down below
Thanks :)
/me *ashamed*
I feel a bit silly right now. I've tried nearly every possible trick I could
come up with while the solution was right in front of me the whole time!
When I started out on this CSS-file I neglected to add my div.spacer-fix and
meanwhile I was wondering why in the world
Thank you very mutch for the answer Paul,
I thought it had gone unnoticedin the middle ofall other messages.
Sory I make them so long and confusing.
I think I didn't explain it very well:
Since the thumbnail gallery is absolutely positioned, what goes all the way down until after the previously
Andy Budd wrote:
Why don't you ask mister Rutter? http://www.clagnut.com/blog/348/
You know what, I must have known this at some stage as I always set %
on the body tag to avoid problems with font sizing in IE. I just
didn't put two and two together and realise it was the same issue. I
I thought WSG people would be interested in the dilemma expressed in
this discussion on AskMetaFilter, and the advice given:
I just started working for an IT company that has been dipping it's
toes in the world of web design development for a while, but not
been doing things right. [...]
Slashdot HTML 4.01 and CSS
After 8 years of my nasty, crufty, hodge podged together HTML, last
night we finally switched over to clean HTML 4.01 with a full
complement of CSS. While there are a handful of bugs and some lesser
used functionality isn't quite done yet, the transition has gone
28 matches
Mail list logo
