> Nick Fitzsimons
> Surely
>
>
>
> Search
>
>
> would therefore keep everybody happy?
Depends on AT support (whether or not a screenreader would actually be able to
make sense of this construct and expose "Search" as explicit label for the
search box when focussed on). Personally,
On 12 Apr 2007, at 13:34:06, Patrick Lauke wrote:
I'm not making assumptions. I'm saying that, for sighted users,
having a text input box with no visible label and a button that
says "Search" immediately next to it is labelling enough.
Surely
Search
would therefore keep everybo
> Stuart Foulstone
> Sorry, I thought we were discussing labels for form input
> boxes (not just
> one-box input search forms).
I was specifically talking about the type of form Bojana mentions in the thread
starter.
> However, generally speaking, making assumptions about
> accessibility base
Sorry, I thought we were discussing labels for form input boxes (not just
one-box input search forms).
However, generally speaking, making assumptions about accessibility based
on the visual positioning of elements "in a logical common place used by
most other sites" is not a good idea.
Better to
You could label the field as "search" and the button as "go" perhaps.
I'm guessing you don't want to label the search field because the submit
would also be labeled search?
Patrick Lauke wrote:
Stuart Foulstone
If you're only concerned about providing form accessibility for
screenre
> Stuart Foulstone
> If you're only concerned about providing form accessibility for
> screenreaders, and no other disability, you could use the
> method below or
> a transparent.gif with appropriate alt-text would work too.
Not necessarily just for screenreader accessibility. If the input itsel
Hi,
If you're only concerned about providing form accessibility for
screenreaders, and no other disability, you could use the method below or
a transparent.gif with appropriate alt-text would work too.
Stuart
On Thu, April 12, 2007 2:50 am, Micky Hulse wrote:
> Bojana Lalic wrote:
>> I dont wa
Hi,
Yes, quite often accessibility features for people with disabilities
increase accessibility for everyone and, hence, "usability".
The clickability of label/field makes forms more accessible for people
with certain motor problems that have difficulty pointing with a mouse by
increasing the "ta
I like some of the flash players out there.
I did a little searching and found an option using flash but parseing a url
to it with 1 line of code to put in the page.
I set a demo here http://wysstech.com/audio/test.htm.
Any opinions on this method
On 4/12/07, Brad Pollard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
I would refer to that as usability.
Stuart Foulstone wrote:
Hi,
Since the ability to click on the label (or field) to put focus on the
field is an accessibility feature of forms, I don't really understand your
point.
Stuart
On Thu, April 12, 2007 9:40 am, Jixor - Stephen I wrote:
The la
Hi,
Since the ability to click on the label (or field) to put focus on the
field is an accessibility feature of forms, I don't really understand your
point.
Stuart
On Thu, April 12, 2007 9:40 am, Jixor - Stephen I wrote:
> The labels are also clickable to focus on their respective fields so I
The labels are also clickable to focus on their respective fields so I
wouldn't say they are purely accessibility oriented in nature.
Stuart Foulstone wrote:
Hi,
The labels are there for accessibility reasons, if you don't want to
design for accessibility, don't pretend to.
Stuart
On Thu, A
Hi,
The labels are there for accessibility reasons, if you don't want to
design for accessibility, don't pretend to.
Stuart
On Thu, April 12, 2007 1:55 am, Bojana Lalic wrote:
> Hi all
>
>
>
> Accverify fails my code because my input element does not contain the
> alt attribute or label.
>
>
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
