Hi ,
Just wanted to join the chorus and say that poping windows is behaviour
and should not be a part of the HTML spec.
It really is akin to manipulating browser chrome and other designer land
grabs (i.e. forgetting its the users broswer, not yours).
Somethings i have found is that the
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 10:30 PM, dwain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes, the pix were floated but the nav div was not. i ran a test. i
removed the width declaration and floated the nav div. when i check it in
ff web dev toolbar the nav div did not shrink wrap or it's contents.
I just tried
Another solution is http://wili.diegolamonica.info that allow you to open
discretional popup windows.
That page is in Italian only but in few days it will be translated in more
other languages.
It doesn't require that you are skilled in javascript, but requires to
follow only the instruction that
Congratulations!
;-)
On Mar 27 2008, at 17:19, Mark Wooldridge wrote:
Hi,
I am currently away from the office and will return on Tuesday as a
married man. I will attend to you email at that time.
If the matter is urgent, please contact Elise Fitzgerald on 9268
2962 or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nancy Gill wrote:
Actually, this link from the W3C suggests the use of both target and
title .. target to open the window and title to tell the user that a new
window will open.
Example 2: A link that opens in a new window
In HTML 4.01 the |target=_blank| attribute can be used on an
On 28 Mar 2008, at 05:48, Jixor - Stephen I wrote:
Yes but you choose to do so rather than being forced to do so.
Usability tests still show that opening a new window confuses
people. They can't work out whey they can't go back and don't seem
to be aware of the task bar. I'm not sure how
Joe Ortenzi wrote:
... The help application opens a new window because it is designed to
help you interact with the application you requested help with. It would
be pretty dumb to delete the thing that you requested help with to be
replaced with the help modal.!!
Exactly my point. And
On Mar 28, 2008, at 10:09 AM, Hassan Schroeder wrote:
Perhaps if you've never seen or used one, it's hard
to conceptualize, but they exist.
Ouch...
However if the subject is still opening new windows vis a vis the
target attribute, it seems to me hard to conceptualize a web app
that
I will be out of the office until 2 April 2008. If your matter is urgent,
please contact Kenji Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe:
My question isn't about how to nest headings properly
E823 - 1 instance(s): Heading elements must be ordered properly. For
example, in HTML H2 elements should follow H1 elements, H3 elements
should follow H2 elements, etc. Developers should not skip levels
(e.g., H1 directly to H3). Do not
Hello.
Is underline really needed? What for?
---
С уважением,
Алексей Новиков.
Электронная почта: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
http://blog.micromarketing.ru/
Действительно интересный блог
об интернете, маркетинге, рекламе и PR своими руками
During user testing I have not seen this cause any problems, particularly
when only one level is skipped. It is certainly odd when you jump from an
h1 or h2 to an h5 or h6, but users generally take even extreme cases
like this in their stride (yes, we do come across sites like this!). In
general,
At 3/28/2008 01:14 PM, Àëåêñåé Íîâèêîâ wrote:
Is underline really needed? What for?
Underline is a method for highlighting
(emphasizing) Roman text. As far as I know it
was invented with the typewriter, being a way to
highlight a bit of text using a machine that was
limited to a single
13 matches
Mail list logo
