On Nov 26, 2008, at 6:49 PM, Ben Lau wrote:
try white-space:normal...?
Thanks a lot. This works.
James, I accidentally deleted your message and empty my trash, so I am
replying to your message in this post–thanks, this must be one of the
best useful tips I have learned in year 2008. I
Maybe not the best solution, but I tend to set the legend to
display:none (IIRC, one can't position off-screen in some browsers), and
then insert a tad bit of additional HTML which is styled to emulate a
legend... I call this class .pseudoLegend:
(CSS:)
/* Emulate fieldset/legend: */
On Nov 27, 2008, at 12:27 AM, Micky Hulse wrote:
...
...
div class=pseudoLegendh5E-mail Story to a friend/h5/div
fieldset
legend class=hideE-mail Story/legend
It works for me. :)
Cheers,
Micky
Thanks Micky,
But isn't this defeats the whole purpose for using legend? I wouldn't
care to
On Nov 27, 2008, at 12:37 AM, tee wrote:
On Nov 27, 2008, at 12:27 AM, Micky Hulse wrote:
...
...
div class=pseudoLegendh5E-mail Story to a friend/h5/div
fieldset
legend class=hideE-mail Story/legend
It works for me. :)
Cheers,
Micky
Thanks Micky,
But isn't this defeats the whole
Dunno, if this has been asked before.
I've been looking wherever I can for a way to get a div's or any
element's background color in a sementic friendly way (ie. works in IE
and FF) using javascript.
so far i've tried the below:
document.getElementById('element').bgColor;
hi tee,
this article gives you some idea of how screen readers use fieldsets/legends
http://www.paciellogroup.com/blog/?p=3
also worthwhile: Too much accessibility - FIELDSET LEGENDS
(http://www.rnib.org.uk/wacblog/articles/too-much-accessibility/too-much-accessibility-fieldset-legends/)
In your
I'm not sure if this will make it to the table, but it is truly worrying.
If they went to the extremes outlined though, don't you think that generally
the public (not just the
web development community) would put up such a stink about it, the
government would be forced into
taking several
On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 21:19 +1100, nedlud wrote:
Okay, so I *should* be concerned about this, in spite of what my
common sense tells me.
So what can we, as web professionals (in Australia), do about it?
I've signed the getup petition. What's the next step?
You could _write_ a letter to
On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 10:18 +, David Dorward wrote:
Brett Patterson wrote:
Where could I find a good information site about the
document.images.imageId script line, please?
http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-DOM-Level-1-19981001/level-one-html.html#ID-26809268
And if you are trying to
I wouldn't have sent this to the group if I'd had even the slightest
idea it was spam. Getup.org.au is a genuinely good site.
IceKat.
Brett Patterson wrote:
1) That, I do believe is a crock of shit!
2) If he does anything like that, he will be dead!!!
--and--
3) Anyone who believes in
Andrew,
I feel that you have hit one of the Big Problems, and perhaps many feel
overwhelmed at its breadth (as do I - I've been pondering it for a few days).
Others may have differing views and experiences, but a lack of governance and
adherence to standards may be a symptom of corporate
Hi all,
Just to elaborate on this one, has anyone ever found a way to remove the left
indent on the legend element in IE? I don't care if I have to add a SPAN inside
the LEGEND element, I just want to make sure the text will be left aligned
correctly in all browsers.
Please send a link if you
Brett Patterson wrote:
Where could I find a good information site about the
document.images.imageId script line, please?
http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-DOM-Level-1-19981001/level-one-html.html#ID-26809268
And if you are trying to code using codes such as
I agree with Dave--a letter to Senator Conroy is the best approach.
The website previously mentioned (http://nocleanfeed.com/) is also a
good place to start if you want to take action.
I'm extremely concerned about this plan (and have been since I heard
about it a months ago) because at first it
I am hoping that the live testing/trial that will
be carried out early next year just shows that this
is technically unfeasible. It is quite stupid to be
filtering the internet for everyone in Australia,
when it is much simpler to be done on each individual
PC through the use of software
Use window.getComputedStyle for standard-compliant browsers and
element.currentStyle for IE.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/DOM/window.getComputedStyle
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms535231(VS.85).aspx
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 12:06, Dennis Suitters [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Dunno,
Hey Paul,
1. almost all browsers left-indent the legend element to some degree. They
use different amounts, with IE being slightly different to most other
browsers.
2. This may have been mentioned in the thread before but FireFox will not
allow the legend element to be positioned at all.
Just to add to this, you can monitor Senator Conroy via email updates and
message him through the Getup wesbite.
http://www.projectdemocracy.com/senator/senator.php?senatorid=15
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jelina Korhecz
Sent:
Okay, so I *should* be concerned about this, in spite of what my
common sense tells me.
So what can we, as web professionals (in Australia), do about it?
I've signed the getup petition. What's the next step?
Nedlud.
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 9:05 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am hoping that
Return Receipt
Your Re: [WSG] Web governance
document:
Return Receipt
Your Re: [WSG] Web governance
document:
Hi Steven, thanks for the two links.
I am replying in a new thread because, after reading the Too much
accessibility - FIELDSET LEGENDS, I feel that it deserves to open a
new thread for a new, hopefully more thorough discussion on Fieldset
and Legend, and maybe to have a closer exmination
tee wrote:
Quote BIM: I don’t see that the W3c intention and the JAWS screen reader
implementation are necessarily at odds; JAWS has a “duty” to keep users
informed that they are in the same group, and this is one way of
achieving it.
Has a duty as being overly helpful that turns to
On Nov 27, 2008, at 3:47 PM, Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
tee wrote:
Quote BIM: I don’t see that the W3c intention and the JAWS screen
reader implementation are necessarily at odds; JAWS has a “duty” to
keep users informed that they are in the same group, and this is
one way of achieving it.
I will be out of the office starting 28/11/2008 and will not return until
29/11/2008.
For e-Reference assistance during my absence, contact Cathy Goodwin (Team
Leader) on 316911 or Jason Dunn (Publishing) on 334416.
**
What Dave?
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 6:04 AM, Dave Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 10:18 +, David Dorward wrote:
Brett Patterson wrote:
Where could I find a good information site about the
document.images.imageId script line, please?
Return Receipt
Your Re: [WSG] Web governance
document:
27 matches
Mail list logo
